The main problem with libertarianism that I see, is that when they say "individuals", in terms of the social actors that should make exchanges and own private property, they include women.As in, they think women should not be someone else's property, but actually a social agent in herself that should own property, live on her terms, and shouldn't be coerced or enslaved by someone else.This is literally what is destroying the west. This is what creates incels, low birth rates, pro crime politicians getting elected (from women's votes), and zero incentive for men to do their part.Women need to be under their husband's authority, have as many children as he wants and take care of them, do all the chores, stay home, and never say no. There's something fundamentally wrong with the social contract when I can be actually productive, work smart and hard, be a positive addition to society, take housing, heating, food and clean water for granted, but miss something as essential as an obedient wife.On top of everything I said. When black incels talk about "thugmaxxing" as a way to get a girlfriend, normies say "hehe no pussy?" if you agree with views mass media condemns, being a "nerd" is considered as a bad thing... You know the incentive structure is fucked.It's obvious that considering women as social agents themselves instead of merchandise is a massive fuck up. So, no. Muh ancap utopia with no state would still not work as long as it's implemented like they are proposing.
Whydoyoutypelikethis?
To people who mock this as some fringe delusion.1. You are proving my point. Because mocking people for having original views because they'll "get no pussy" or be overall unpopular, usually with women, is a showcase of how women's freedom stifles society's creativity.2. Women respond very well to social consensus, you know it, and if men got together on this, they would agree to be property.
>>522570280I just like separating paragraphs. The post looks better.I know you'll probably say "reddit spacing" kek ironically, that's not what reddit spacing meant originally. Stupid newfags say this when they have no idea what reddit spacing even is. This is perfectly normal paragraph separation, with one empty line, so the text is more readable.
>>522570384Cool, good luck with your fascinating INCEL manifesto.
>>522570444>your picthis but unironically
>>522570326Well yeah, it's obvious, objective truth, and has been for our entire existence up to 1920, which with the also obvious and inevitable impending collapse of our society which is destined to be ruled by the cultures that never tried to question or change normal human behavior where a man owns his women and children.
>>522570214American libertarians view the founders of our nation with a near religious reverence.The truth is, they would certainly see modern libertarians are a bunch of faggots, and probably end up beating them half to death.>oy vey, throwing hot tar on someone? >throwing feathers on them?>towing them out of town naked, on a pole jammed up their ass?>that sounds like COLLECTIVISM you tyrants, >how will me and my nigger boyfriend accept this level of->-wait, NO STOP IT BURNS, IT BURNS, mommy please!
Faggot propagandaWhy am I a libertarian? Read more here: >>522569695
>>522570214will tread
>>522570214only good post in 4chan right now, especially in /pol/this guys gets itThe most stupid mistake men ever done, was 100 years ago just say "yeah women you can marry anyone you want, or not even marry at all, and you can vote with full power in our society".Men and women want different things, doing said above made women start using their new found power to enslave men ruining society in the process, something women don't quite realize yet. Technology will cease to exist in the future because women are not having sex with "nerds" who create technology in the first place, since nerds give them the ickWe must disassociate from the women. If women want their freedom and their own society, then they need to own and defend their own land, without the assistance from men, be it in war or in taxation.
>>522570280shut up retardyou low IQ faggots who don't care about arguments, and are feminists to your core do not belong here
>>522570214Libertarianism is just the right wing version of Communism. It's an ideology that appeals to retarded teenagers that have a fundamental misunderstanding of how human nature works. Just like Commies think a utopia could be achieved if everyone were willing to give up their possessions and work for the collective good under pure authority, libertarians believe that everyone living in a lawless society would somehow make responsible society-healthy decisions without being forced or regulated to.Fanciful nonsense both. Too much government control gives you Soviet Russia. Too little gives you Somalia.
>>522570214And what do women get out of this new social contract you propose?
>>522570214Libertarians are just liberals with an identity crisis. Back in the day nobody could tell them apart because everybody knew it was the same thing.
>>522573078>non-existent girlfriend>the fedora hasn't yet worked its magic>boring sounding books>so many pages! ugh>attractive fedora>guaranteed to work its magic on the femalesYou wouldn't be talking shit if the fedora wearing guy could buy a wifeYou proved my point yet again.Women's freedom stifles society's creativity and originality. If you have original ideas you're told "hehe no pussy?".Literally HALF YOUR POINTS amount to enforced uniformity and unoriginality by women.>It's an ideology that appeals to retarded teenagersLiterally EVERY FUCKING TIME someone says this, they have no idea how economics work themselves. Even your pic says it. Libertarians read boring books and get no women by virtue of having original ideas. You on the other hand, are soulless. Shut the fuck up.I agree with libertarians except for this point on women and a few others, and for the most part consider myself to be a libertarian, or close.
>>522573401They shouldn't have to get anything out of it and should just obey.
