[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


>women, who are majority of voters, vote against equality when it doesnt suit them

kek, brutal
>>
>>522587150
Sending women to war is retarded. Men don't fight women, they fight over women.
>>
Women should be drafted to provide sex and comfort to the male population. They can earn medals for being the hottest piece of ass. We’ll call it the Slut Force.
>>
>>522587211
Switzerland hasn't been sending anyone to wars for almost 200 years, it is not even in NATO.
>>
>>522587211
yes, america will invade venezuala for their women, not because wall street kikes want thert oil
>>
>>522587211
Then women don't deserve to vote. It's that simple.
Men assume a much larger burden in society compared to women.
>>
>>522587150
nothing will change till jews start dying and women start getting beaten
>>
>>522587427
The Russian Military actually had that a while ago. Not sure if its still a thing.
>>
>>522587714
Women and their simp enablers never seem to grasp that simple concept that equal rights means equal responsibilities.

Otherwise it places one gender in an unfair position of privilege that only fosters resentment for the gender that assumes greater responsibilities for no proportional benefit.
>>
isnt this sexist?
>>
>>522588061
>>522587854
>>522587427

Wow. Just wow... I have no words... People like you need to be locked up and castrated and given estrogen therapy. Good darwin I hate testosterone.
>>
File: IMG_1482.jpg (1.21 MB, 1536x2472)
1.21 MB
1.21 MB JPG
>>522587211
Fag
>>
>>522588134
fuck off hole
>>
No. I could definitely see plenty of men not wanting women in the army.
>>
>>522587150
The presumption of keeping women out of the military is that they are valuable for having children. Except they're not having children either.

So the penalty for women who refuse military service and having children should be 50% of their income, starting from age 25 on.

The choice for them should be mandatory military service, just like the men, or 2.0 children by age 25. Otherwise, penalities.

Men should not be responsible for upholding the entirety of society while women assume zero risk. And if you DO want women to assume zero risk, their right to vote must be recinded since they are not valid members of society at that point.
>>
>>522588061
Why would they want or need to grasp that concept? They can tell you "diversity, inclusion and equity" is a good thing, and you can't question it because their people have already been inserted into all positions of power, and the grunts who do the actual work are easily replaceable, especially if they complain.
>>
>>522588323
>The presumption of keeping women out of the military is that they are valuable for having children. Except they're not having children either.
Fucking. This.
If the cuntoids don’t need to serve their biological purpose why the fuck should we do so?
Women, simps and boomers cannot wrap their fucking heads around this one
>>
>>522587150
It was a commie intiative to cuck what is left of our military by turning climate protesting and clapping for rapfugees into a national service.
>>
>>522588464
The problem with it is that such a system is inherently unstable, WILL collapse, and it will happen either via civil war or mass-influx of foreigners who will dispose of it and enslave the women while killing the simps.
>>
And /pol/ STILL wonders why there are trannies
>>
File: estrogen frogs.jpg (83 KB, 682x682)
83 KB
83 KB JPG
>>522589492
>>
>>522587427
Shit you have my vote
>>
>>522587492
If one good thing comes out of AI, hopefully it's that it eliminates the income for the woman in that image.
>>
>>522587211
Jfl at you idiots who fantasize about tribal fights and keep framing the world that way.

You fail to understand the most obvious thing. Most men will do whatever their jewish masters tell them to. That's it. Their master may be using them to fight over resources, territorial control, whatever he wants. But only the master really wins or losses, because, to say that a soldier can win a war, is like saying that my computer is writing this post.
>>
>>522587492
Because millions of people watch the woman on the right's stuff online and a lot of them pay her real money to see more. It's just how the world works, unless you want us to live under a socialist/communist society.
>>
>>522589903
I disagree. I think one can be a libertarian, not want to coerce anyone, and still have an opinion on what people do.
>>
>>522587211
No. Men fight for their family. Particularly the children. Women are easily replaceable and don’t really matter in the grand scheme of things. Stop being dumb.
>>
>>522588134
> Wow. Just wow... I have no words
Are you a woman by any chance?
That would explain it.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.