[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: images (1).jpg (37 KB, 556x552)
37 KB
37 KB JPG
I'm seeing a lot of similarities between India today and China in the early 90's. People viewed China back then like they view India now. Not saying they are the same but don't be surprised when India becomes the world number 1 in a couple decades or less
>>
>>522612471
except China has intelligent people and a long history of civilizations, these brownoids have been around for a f
>>
>>522612471
"A couple decades" ago in 2005, China's GDP was growing in the double digits, every year. India's current GDP is growing by only 8% a year. India is more than 20 years behind China!
>>
>>522612557
Indians have more smart people than China. Per capita does not matter in this case. It's actually better if there are more retards for cheap labor
>>
>>522612766
China is stalling. Falling birthrates. Haven't you noticed big companies pulling out of China in favor of cheaper asian countries namely....India?
>>
>>522612471
If you ever visited either place you’d know they are not comparable, now or in the past.

India has massive systematic issues which arguably prevent it from ever really crawling out of it’s poverty.
China even under Mao and later was seeing massive industrial development and uplifting of everyone.
India dumped it’s old soviet model of developing heavy industry because as an extremely divided democracy it couldn’t commit to long term policies and thus vast swathes of the nation remain in abject poverty with no real improvement unlike china.
>>
>>522612836
Indians can’t organize
IQ of individuals doesn’t matter when you can’t get the masses on board.
>>
>>522612926
You are deluded if you think this, companies that try inevitably crawl back to China because it’s not about cheap labour but SKILLED labour as well as heavy industry.

India has neither of these and every company that tried to move production to India has seen only negative effects.

The only real threat to China would be a resurgent USA or Europe that managed to rebuild it’s heavy industry.
>>
>>522612926
Sure, "having lots of cheap unskilled labor" could be advantageous, but it isn't really something to brag about. It isn't something that the country ACCOMPLISHED, you know?
>>
File: 17372326636536267.png (277 KB, 1080x631)
277 KB
277 KB PNG
>>522612926
Meanwhile.
>>
>>522612471
Chinas average iq is high. Yours is not. It's that simple. The only equaliser is ai but that is also a dark horse.
>>
>>522613131
I remember seeing an interview in Mumbai with Lee Kwan Yew where they asked him if India could ever be like China or Singapore and he flat our said “No”

Not because Indians are all stupid or that they lack resources, but because of the cultural and political situation in India making it impossible to do anything at large scale or uplift the entire nation out of poverty.

One specific example was the farmers who intentionally stifle Mumbai and appropriate it’s tax revenue because they pressure politicians to redistribute the wealth to them.
>>
>>522613091
And yet India gdp is 5th worldwide even with all these "problems"
>>522613124
India landed on the moon. I'd consider that a massive accomplishment for them
>>
>>522613267
Badically what he said without actually saying it directly was that for India to ever rise like China it needed to become like Maos china or the soviet union.
Destroy the backward religious cults, the caste system, and the corrupt democracy.
>>
>>522612471
China is a different beast compared to India
>>
>>522613285
GDP is a meaningless number

India has many wealthy people, obscenely wealthy, and many foreign companies who operate there, but the nation itself lacks really any significant heavy industry (for such a large country) which is the key to sustainable growth for the entire population.

It also has 2 billion people which is Indias #1 wealth source since they treat their own people like slaves and property.
>>
File: IMG_8720.jpg (136 KB, 698x658)
136 KB
136 KB JPG
>>522612471
China in the 90s had been devastated by the war with Japan, Mao Zedong and incredible cultural unrest.

India is just a shithole made by people too diverse and numerous to form a coherent society.
>>
>>522613285
If India manage to reform politically then maybe they will be able to do something with that GDP but the reverse is true with China, Everyone thought that by them developing they would become more liberal and democratize. The opposite happened their central government allowed them to develop more efficiently.
>>
India is basically a few small islands of wealth and success floating on a gigantic sea of shit, and that sea is only growing and not improving.

They have smart people and can do great things, but it’s all held down by the gigantic social and political problems.
>>
File: 1692114061354.png (653 KB, 503x603)
653 KB
653 KB PNG
China and India are turd world countries on par with each other. Full of scammers, street-shitters, unwarranted self-importance. China only has a slight edge from their women being not as repulsive.
>>
>>522613447
China is the big success story of central planning.
India is the exact opposite since Indra Gandhi was killed.
>>
The indians are hungry too

They know english and reprofuce like rabits cus i tell you what, it doesnt seem like anyone besides blacks enjoy being alive like indians. So the world will be theirs.

I really see people giving up at the idea of a brown world and that plays into their hand all the more. Even the chinese sense this and shrug.

Imagine a jeet world where the africans are their slaves. No one stands a chance outside of nuking them.
>>
Jeets aren't meant for greatness. Even their greatest figure was just a pedophile scammer whose biggest achievement was to beg the brit for independent. Literally a begger. Didn't even fight for it.
Small, pathetic people. Destined to be nothing but trash
>>
>>522613285
>India landed on the moon
Not really relevant in terms of long term geopolitical power, relevance, and prosperity. So did the Soviets, and see how that turned out for them.
Agriculture still employs over half of the Indian workforce. They brag about their tech/service sector, but what happens when automation replaces their call center and help desk jobs? Unlike China, they don't have a manufacturing base to fall back on.
>>
>>522613511
Yep and it is why India will never be a serious threat to anybody. China proved that if you want to develop and pull your people out of poverty then you have to use central planning while India, well, they are still India and that despite inheriting an entire colonial infrastructure and never having to fight a land war on their own territory they are still less developed than their less fortunate northern neighbors.
>>
File: IMG_8300.jpg (82 KB, 640x640)
82 KB
82 KB JPG
>>522613401
Broski, they started saying these things about India in the year 2000, then they said it would be a superpower by 2020 investment poured in, it all went to dogshit, it takes 30 years to start a business there, the infrastructure is made by a madman, the wiring isn’t safe, their submarines sink because someone left a hatch open.

They leave their garbage in the rivers they drink from and insist it can’t be polluted no matter how many bodies and shit and chemical run-off pours into it, and you’re telling me this industrial disaster magnet is going to be number #1
with over 1000 distinct cultures.
>>
>>522612836
What utter bullshit. And cope at that. Chinas population is 1.4 billion. The average IQ is 100. That means that there are 700 million people in china with an IQ over 100. India's average is roughly 80 that means that only roughly one third at most have an iq over 100 (this isn't actually true because the IQ distribution is relatively narrow but whatever) so only 20% have an iq above 100. That's 280 million.
>>
File: Indian-Office-6.jpg (315 KB, 850x1280)
315 KB
315 KB JPG
>>522613243
>Your IQ score is not high

Indians are the smartest race on Earth

The average Indian IQ score is 110
>>
>>522613827
Jeets have almost 2 billions fecaloids. Probably more, unaccounted for cause they just shit out then fecaloids like poop and the dalits don't bother with registering and the government is too incompetent to care and correct it
>>
File: Indian-Doctor12.jpg (128 KB, 892x1300)
128 KB
128 KB JPG
>>522612836
Yep. Indians are extremely smart

There's a reason why Indian immigrants dominate the American tech industry
>>
>>522613851
Crazy that stupid people beat the brakes off them then and that the Yellow Chinese of Formosa are one of the few races that can build microchip fabs while India can't even be trusted to push global updates for software correctly.
>>
>>522612471
>People viewed China back then like they view India now
Nobody viewed Chinese as child rapists showering in feces.
>>
>>522613918
Lets see the jeet's math Olympic gold medal. Bottom rank. Lol, lmao. Btfo'd by Vietnam, let alone chyna
>>
File: India-Office-23.jpg (70 KB, 1300x956)
70 KB
70 KB JPG
>>522613945
>Stupid people

Indians aren't stupid

Indians actually have the largest brains on Earth
>>
>>522613652
People don’t realize how much of India is sustained by remittance payments of overseas Indians.
They din’t even have close to enough work for everyone so they intentionally push people abroad to work and send money back.

>>522613614
Indian birth rates are directly tied to a large uneducated population but even this is in decline.

Unlike China, India never had a cultural revolution and thus has to face the full brunt of Modernism with little protection.

The Indian kinship model frankly doesn’t work in a world where women have any authority at all, nor do they have a realistic solution to feminist, meanwhile FemJeets are the most hardcore feminists around.

When Indian men can’t rely on their family arranging a marriage, birth rates collapse because they don’t really have the cultural equipment to manage without it.

China has fertility issues but they also have a gigantic industry and advanced infrastructure which means they can shift slowly into a lower-population without a total social collapse as the physical capital is already there and can increasingly be automated.

The end goal of socialism is rapidly becoming reality in China, a world where hordes or poor workers are not needed socially or economically.

Chinese are also totally happy to just gift kidnapped brides to their rural men in order to sure up agrarian populations.

Ranjeet struggles to get a gf in the “western way” while Chang just get’s his state appointed Turkic bride.
>>
>>522614016
Anon please stop trolling
>>
File: India-Doctorr.png (668 KB, 781x979)
668 KB
668 KB PNG
>>522614126
I'm telling the truth

I personally know hundreds of Indian immigrants, and none of them works for DoorDash or convenience stores

Indian immigrants are very smart, and they prop up the information technology and healthcare industries
>>
File: Kelly-Kapoor-TheOffice.jpg (101 KB, 709x996)
101 KB
101 KB JPG
>>522612557
>China has intelligent people

India has intelligent people too, lots of them

After all, India's average IQ is 110
>>
File: 1753488571233906.png (296 KB, 680x420)
296 KB
296 KB PNG
>>522613914
It's funny when ever I see someone say "btw jeets are below replacement" or something else regarding there demography like that a meme flaggot will always jump into say "no fellow White people there are too many. Despair!"
Fuck off jeet.
>>
File: GDP-of-India.png (84 KB, 1449x593)
84 KB
84 KB PNG
Indian people are so smart that India's GDP is 4 trillion US dollars
>>
>>522614038

Yeah well lots of mixed race indian kids in the powerful sphere of the anglosphere.
Even elon has one

Get ready for a whole new spin on my fellow white people. Everything will be about making money on building india.

Idk they have so much momentum its concerning
>>
>>522612471
Why isn't the rest of India colored?
>>
File: images (13).jpg (7 KB, 299x168)
7 KB
7 KB JPG
You know someone said India today has the same GDP as China in 2008 yet somehow China back then was more advanced.

I wonder how true that is.

Back then China already had a work high speed rail, a successful Olympics, was already big in manufacturing etc etc. A lot of these areas not covered by GDP metrics.
>>
>>522614711
Oh yeah and one more thing. Even back then China had 40% in low level agriculture while India TODAY has it closer to 50%.
>>
File: 1764542426032356.png (306 KB, 587x680)
306 KB
306 KB PNG
>>522612471
+1000 izzat saar
India numbah one
>>
>>522612471
I don't necessarily disagree with the idea of comparing India to China in the 90s but that doesn't change the fact I'm sick of fucking looking at them on every corner. I have no fucking idea where they all came from but they seem to be everywhere and I'm sick of it.
>>
>>522614602
I know a lot of western elites are betting on India, because China is politically an issue for them.
Honestly however I think it’s a non-starter.
The idea is to pit India against china while also replacing the white middle class with an Indian one, and various others (muslims/south Americans) as the labour class. Issue is it’s clearly not working and western countries are tearing apparat at the seams entirely as a result of Liberal leadership.

I din’t think western nations will do well either, but for different reasons, as since the cold war we have been creating a totally unsustainable society that has zero cohesion or really reason to remain united aside from immediate convenience for the well-off and threats of punishment from above.

I think the future of western nations is either a soft-socialism not unlike FDR’s America (best case scenario) or hard communism/fascism if not just balkanization in the worst case.

We all know this but no one want’s to be the last guy holding the bag at the end.
>>
>>522614711
Because GDP is a meme and China is not a liberal economy but a planned one.
>>
>>522612557
Americans were concerned with floods of chinks (bastardization of qing) coming in and ruining our wages. This isn't the first time America has dealt with a wave of shitty shitskins from foreign lands with backwards customs.
>>
>>522612836
Chinks and jeets are both retarded in their own ways.
>>
File: India-Office.jpg (73 KB, 1300x775)
73 KB
73 KB JPG
>>522614899
>India
>retarded

They're literally the smartest race on Earth
>>
File: -1x-1.jpg (229 KB, 1024x720)
229 KB
229 KB JPG
>>522614836
I know we should not outright dismiss India.

But I feel westerners esp those in positions of power are too lazy to do proper research or due diligence on India. After all its a big place like China but even harder to research due to way less written records and few things being properly centralized.

So they just say. Its big and its asia just like China. Therefore it will follow China and become big.

Thats really lazy thinking that led to fuck ups like Enron investing in that failed Dabhol project in India. That thing had huge loses and was one of the large contributing factors to the collapse on Enron.
>>
>>522614836

Great overlook of it all.
...Do you see there being a new type of chinese exclusionary act used on them?
I dont... but sure do wish they would
>>
>>522613914
>Probably more,
India introduced digital ID, so no there are no unaccounted people anymore.
>>
File: 1756771878291288.png (1.24 MB, 1339x1015)
1.24 MB
1.24 MB PNG
>>522612836
>retards for cheap labor
You sure about that?
Do you even know what a supply chain is?
>>
>>522612471
india will NEVER develop as it is a rapist country that will never accept equality of women.

India has not made progress in thousands of years. India is a cursed land
>>
>>522614899
You will misunderstand me so.
Only because the UK came in into your country and change you.
In China everyone came dominated them and the conversion is more than 60% plus Russia + France and all of EU and Japan.
But the Chinese are culturally very less aggressive and kind which led to their complete overrun by EU. EU brought different kind of oppression than they used to, less brutal but fundamentally change at the genome level. which is why they want to rejuvenate.
However, socialism worked miracle for China. Saved them from completely dying. But important due to thousands years of challenging system, the Chinese people understood what empathy is, and over all character that is very likable, and very useful. Faithfulness and obedience, and hard work. I imagined the Europeans liked the Chinese very much and does the Americans, and so am I.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.