Why would one want to keep AI modeld Open Source. Wouldn't everyone be able to copy you?
What's open source? Is that another Jewish trick like "non-profit" or something
>>522618439>Wouldn't everyone be able to copy you?I'm sure every free open source model has embedded a backdoor so it's just basically telemetry data back to the makers so your'e basically training their models for them.
>>522618526DeepSeek I think is still open source.
>>522618439Because we arent all Jews anon.Im happy with prompt sharing or AI sharing
>>522618439American software "innovation" was always like that. Get a bunch of free opensource software stick it together and pretend you invented it. And then make billions doing it. Mutts really aren't so different from the scamjeets
>>522618439>using chinese software as a basisIt's a goddamned trojan horse.
>made in USA>USA>madeahahaha
>>522618526Qwen and DeepSeek are the two big ones and they're both chink.There're others, but if you don't want to pay for an expensive API, don't want to give up your data and you don't need the extra performance, you go local and for local the two above are the best for most areas.
>>522619687qwen and deepseek are both garbage, only our (((media))) takes them seriously. llama, gemma, mistral, phi are all free and generally the only ones benchmarked against each other
>>522618526>What's open source?It's just like Wikipedia. Everyone can add to it or edit the software. It's not tied to a single company. You can even incorporate it into your own commercial software. Which makes very valuable to Big Tech giants because they can just leverage the unpaid labor of volunteers
>>522620014pajeet stfu
>>522620298>chink cope
>Americans willingly install chink backdoor virus into their OSerm.
