[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


How do we feel about parents and grandparents using young children to make online content?

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/h2i3cGyzNKo

Is kidfluencing child labour or child exploitation by definition? Especially since they have no labour protections?

Should this be legal or not?
>>
>>523217069
as it is right now youtube, tiktok etc are organs of the worst regime to ever exist
so yes it's bad, you should raise your kids so they don't even know what a television or a school is, and when they see it their only frame of reference is that it's some kind of scrying mirror for devil worship (accurate)
>>
>>523217069
that was a retarded post
>>
>>523217214
My post or the clip I linked?
>>
>>523217069
Every kid with "smart"phone make this shit slops, they all dream to be "YouTube influencers" and shit like that, "smart"phone is mind weapon
>>
>>523217284
Yes. Gen Alphas we’re asked what they wanted to be as adults and most of them said YouTuber or influencer.
>>
>>523217263
the post was substantive enough, but the video turned it into a waste of time. there is my full critique of your OP
>>
>>523217576
I see.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.