You are not "better" than someone on welfare, just luckier.
Did better at school, for one
If everyone on welfare disappears it would be a positive and the people finding welfare would be fine. If everyone funding welfare disappeared, the people on welfare would also disappear
>>523308966there's actually intangible forces at work to keep certain people at the bottom and rise certain people to the top. perhaps its the archons or matrix agents or whatever, it is 100% supernatural. perhaps past life karma idk doesnt matter but its real. i have more talent than the average normie by far. and if you havent noticed, much of the wealthiest people are talentless hacks or even literal retards.
>>523308966Depends on the person on welfare.
I'm not better than them, and I am luckier. But I also work a lot harder and generally make better decisions.
>>523309077me, i'll always be kept at the bottom by intangible supernatural forces. whenever things are going too good i know they're coming to tear it all down.
>>523309077>>523309100this is why ive realized if i willingly stay at the bottom and dont try to have anything or be anything, they leave me alone, because im right where they want me, and my life goes much smoother and more enjoyable. maybe that has to do with why so many ancient monks etc would reject all wealth and material prosperity.
>>523309077We are all put in our place and time for a reason, but the end goal of these karmas is a society where everyone lives as an ubermensch turbo-billionaire.On Earth as it is in Heaven.
>>523308966Incorrect. I am better than everyone on welfare combined.
>>523308966I am better by default, because everyone on welfare is a parasite. I just wish we would implement a cure, instead of feeding these parasite degenerates.
>>523308966"Luckier" in the sense that I was lucky enough to be born with better genes that make me BETTER and thus able to work a good job. So yes I am better than them.This is being generous and assuming that everyone on welfare is actually trying to get off it, which is not the case.
>>523309082That's called "being better" dumbass.
>>523309386Only by one definition. I may not have some other good qualities they have. And even if I did, from the perspective of someone better than both of us, I may look basically the same. Two random ants in an anthill may seem very different to someone the size of an ant, but to us who are so much greater, they are functionally identical.
Shit like this pisses me off, especially since many people actually believe it. After getting dicked down by zog in the army and being medically discharged at 29, I had to start from zero and got myself through practical nursing school by 32, registered nursing school by 36 and nurse practitioner school before 40 while injured and on way more meds than I want to be on.
>>523309169This reason is not good and not for your benefit
>>523308966>You are not "better", just "whiter"Fixed
>>523308966JK Rowling was on Welfare and worked herself off of it.MTV did a series on rich people who were on welfare and food stamps and then sold the food stamps when they didn't need it at all.
