[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


i approve, but god is it fucking stupid. are they really going to run her again? if not who?
>>
it doesn't matter but ill vote for her anyway because i believe the federal government will collapse faster that way
>>
>>523622457
women cannot be president. the constitution explicitly says "he".
>>
>>523622457
Im with her Weve come too far to run a evil white male from California We are about diversity

Again
>>
They need Jeet Dung Vance to win so they have to run someone really unlikeable.
>>
>>523622457
they won't run her since she will actually have to win a primary this time
>>
>>523622457
She'll try but Newsom will beat her
>>
File: Fine stine.jpg (119 KB, 719x508)
119 KB
119 KB JPG
>>523622457
not old enough
>>
>>523622457
She's fucking stupid. Only Gavin Newsom has a good chance of winning, especially against JD Vance, that would be guaranteed. He would demolish him.
>>
>>523622457
Don't hate the Player, hate the Game.
>>
>>523622457
Compared to her preliminary performance, she overperformed. She proved that having a D next to your name is objectively more important than policy ideas
>>
File: USA.jpg (94 KB, 630x737)
94 KB
94 KB JPG
>>523622457
The republicans are there for the taking after trumps disastrous term. Then they go and shoot themselves in the foot with that stupid bitch
>>
>>523622888
The oligarch class decides the winner. You assume the democrats want to win but the uniparty wants Jeet Dung. They intentionally tanked the last elections too giving Trump the win. It was decided years in advance.
>>
She's beyond delusional if she thinks she has a chance. She went silent for 10 months while Trump destroyed much of the Constitution then went on a grievance book tour. Her time is over - she made a huge miscalculation in not running for CA governor.
>>
>>523622798
>Newsom
i think i have something like newsom derangement syndrome because i have no clue why he is appealing other than he's handsome and a smooth talker. the people that will vote for him will still be voting against trump even though he won't be on the ballot. i don't think it will happen, but i think trump needs to somehow vanish ahead of the 2028 election to reset the stage.
>>
>>523622457
$1.4 billion wasn't enough to protect democracy, maybe $2.5 billion will be. I took on a second job to donate to her campaign, and it will be worth it as she is the best candidate of all time and actually over qualified if I'm being honest.
>>
>>523623400
Because the bar is set that low. The democrats are running clearly senile child sniffers and phony nigger pajeetas and tampon tims lately. Newsom seems outwardly normal and is a white man.

This is of course by design. If they wanted the democrats to win they could for sure find someone likeable enough for the masses to secure a win.
>>
>>523622560
I guess that's a good enough reason.
>>
>>523622457
If Democrats actually have primaries, and she wins those primaries, then sure. But if they don't have primaries and just say "we wants a black queen!!! It's her time, chud!1!1!!" Then I find that retarded and setting yourself up for disappointment in a situation that should be a lay up, considering how abysmally unpopular MAGA is at the moment.
>>
File: images(2).jpg (26 KB, 399x385)
26 KB
26 KB JPG
>>523622457
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAGAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAH
I cannot express enough how FUCKING RETARDED this would be. It's like they WANT to lose. It was like that last time. Shit, they even knew that because they forced Ms. BRAT up front without giving their voters any choice in the matter.
Holy SHIT the women of the DNC are absolutely TRYING to destroy this country by negligence.
>>
>>523623400
>Handsome and a smooth talker
That's literally all you need to win an election
>>
>>523622888
Newsom would provoke french style unrest. He is far too slimy to be tolerable.
>>
>>523623298
Destroyed the constitution how? Cite an example.
>>
They need someone to make the new Hillary Clinton. You'd think they would at least try to find someone not as equally off-putting and fake though.
>>
>drops out before Iowa in 2020
>loses big to the orange retard after Democrat apparatus forces Biden to step down
>wants to try again
oh no no no
>>
>>523624031
Them Dems are exclusively owned and operated by women now. They're all huffing their own farts so hard they can't see past forceful-feminism.
It's a damn shame because they could do quite well if they dropped the wokeshit and focused on worker's rights and the economy. They're too arrogant for that, though, being women and all. So what we get is the world's most retarded package deal every election. Can't get the economy without wokeshit!
>>
>>523622457
It's just a pay off anon.
She will run with 20 others simply to cash out and disappear after the first primary. They owe her this for hiding the fact Biden was insane and the autopen ran everything.

The usual far left larpers will run too in order to fundraise and promise ridiculous shit then of course will slide it all to the corporatist nominee and endorse them again just like 2016 "sorry no refunds" but everyone will fall for it again
>>
>>523624031
They just tried Michelle Obama a few months back with her new podcast
>>
File: images(5).jpg (30 KB, 562x545)
30 KB
30 KB JPG
>>523624183
Why can't they just be serious and run a man?
>>
>>523624183
She will never run, her job is to fundraise just like AOCs sole job is fundraising. Imagine the fake Obama foundation surviving national vetting there's no way she runs
>>
>>523622560
>>523622605
>>523622724
>>523622726
Bernie bros, brocialists, tankies, and other dipshits. One word of advice. Kindly fuck the hell off. I will only vote for Kamala or Hillary or mayor Pete. It is non-negotiable. Common sense picks that most people want. You try to shame the majority of voters yet you're the ones with the fringe opinions. There was and is nothing wrong with them as candidates. They've done more with their lives than you ever have, that's for fucking sure. It's actually people like you that cost the 2016 and 2024 elections. Oh no not my loser dudes Bernie and Andrew didn't win, guess I better vote for trump then. Let that sink in, you voted for the worst president of all time because you were upset nobody listened to jack shit you said and remained unconvinced by your weirdo takes so you spite voted. You got some deep-seated issues and people are sick and tired of the bullying from your side. You don't have arguments. Just wow my boring dude agrees with me more so like I'll make fun of and literally make shit up about people who had the best chance of winning. This is why no one likes you. Very toxic attitude motivated by nothing to do with politics. You just think you know best and want to be contrarian and are upset nobody takes you seriously and actually finds your attitude and behavior extremely rude and offensive. Literally all your beliefs are just in bad faith motivated by none other than being a total dick.
>>
>>523623607
>This is of course by design. If they wanted the democrats to win they could for sure find someone likeable enough for the masses to secure a win.
they're probably going to do the obama strategy again. run a dark-horse with virtually no history in politics that can be easily manipulated. my guess is that they have already selected this person, but they don't want to show their hand too soon. newsom and kamala are basically acting as a smokescreen until they finally roll out their 'game changing' candidate. while the right is laughing about the left having no bench, the left is plotting a path forward. the dnc has people working on this shit full-time. meanwhile i'm here thinking jd has it in the bag.
>IT'S TOO SOON!!!
>IT'S TOO SOON!!
bullshit. they're probably already practicing debate speeches with the guy they selected. on both sides.
>>
File: IMG_20251211_124705.png (309 KB, 396x396)
309 KB
309 KB PNG
>>523624888
Is this a copypasta?
>>
>>523624257
You're so close....

It's because they're not serious. It's the war hawk/Likud/Chabad kikes running things now. The left's hippie rainbow bootyhole jews are being put in the corner to get their shit together and think about how bad they fucked up. Their job right now is to put up token opposition while the Likuds run things. The goofy goyim the left employs is mostly unaware of it. They're not going to be let back to the table until they take care of their pro-palestine antisemites (which they embarrassingly had to have the right stomp for them because they weren't able to handle it internally).

We're going to have 4-8 years of Vance (or possibly Rubio), offset by a Democrat Congress for the most part. That's their opportunity to play ball with the Likud right and prove they can effectively goyim-wrangle.
>>
All they have to do is to pick a straight, white male candidate under 70. It would absolutely demolish republican support, just like the last time. But no they're too invested in that "Miss president" meme.
>>
>>523626713
the dnc paid the bitch on the right 20M to figure out how to gain the support of young men....
>>
>>523622457
Isn't it pretty much guaranteed that they are running Newsom?
>>
>>523628671
>Alright men, how do we get young men to vote for us again?
>We could stop vilifying them and let them have a stake in society.
>Shut the fuck up, John. Stacy, go and pay some influencer 20 million to come up with another answer.
Kek
>>
>>523622457
>Step 1: come in last in the primary in 2020
>Step 2: lose to a candidate any other Democrat would have beaten
>Step 3: Write a book badmouthing everyone else in your party
Sounds like the perfect recipe for success
>>
>>523629226
i had the displeasure of actually watching this video. her solution to the 'young men problem' seemed to be
>I LOVE YOUNG MEN
>THEY ACTUALLY ALREADY AGREE WITH US ON ALL THE MAIN ISSUES!!!
so they hired a landwhale to tell the dnc not to change. which is probably what the dnc wanted to hear. can't tell if she's stupid or smart for just telling the dnc some nonsense. david hogg is a moron but he was trying to shake things up in the dnc and they booted him. the fat bitch must be playing the long game. or she's likely clueless.
>>
last years cope was
> she never got to run her own campaign!
she never had to win a primary either
let's see her attempt it, at least she'll have full support from the antiwhite media but probably not a lot from democrats who bet the farm on her and lost already
>>
>>523623298
>Trump destroyed much of the Constitution
How did he do that? What parts specifically?
>>
>>523629138
newsome cant even tie his shoes without going 40 billion dollars into debt, selling the shoes to china, then blaming trump for mud on his shoes
>>
>>523630111
>which is probably what the dnc wanted to hear.
Yeah, we keep having the same issues. Establishment parties bleed a shitload of votes in the elections, ship in some analysts who tell them where they fucked up, and the analyst then goes
>Actually, there is no problem, everyone agrees with you, you just didn't go hard enough on it!
because he knows perfectly well that this is the only answer they want to hear and guarantees that he will be hired again.
>>
>>523624257
>Why can't they just be serious and run a man?
it's 2015+10, that's why.
>>
>>523622457
It's pretty tough for an average person to conceptualize how truly narcissistic and self-righteous these uber-privileged people truly are. In her mind, she unironically only lost because of heckin misogyny and because she only had a short amount of time to run her campaign (she even named her book after that).
>>
>>523622457
Democrats literally have no policies besides race baiting and abortions. Total failure of a party.
>>
>>523622457
Voting for the jeet married to a jew, Please run this drunk hag again.
>>
>>523622457
Possible because the democrat party is entirely controlled by girl boss roasties but I think there might, might be enough who want to fuck jewsom for him to get it. He’s really their only option and if he just shut the fuck up about nigger trannies and talked about prices and wages and housing for everyone, no disadvantaged communities or any of that shit it’d be a reagan esq landslide.
Unfortunately for him he’s obsessed with troons and muh minorities so there’s no telling.
>>
>>523622993
>trump
>disastrous term
Watch less associated press.
>>
>>523622457
No, they're gonna run Newsom. [spoiler] And it looks like he's gonna win fml
>>
>>523622457
Last time she primaried it was at sub 5%
>>
>>523624909
They can't pull off an Obama 2.0, because
1) Nobody alive during that is going to fall for it a second time
2) The current Dem establishment is so fucking retarded that they're going to insist upon getting another 'first' in office, so it's going to be a sheboon, and nobody wants a sheboon. They lost 5 battleground states the last time they tried it.
>>
>>523630910
>>
>>523631149
>still believing polls after 2016
Like I said.
>>
>>523630767
>>523630786
i'm afraid hubris will take the republican party down. christ, democrats could be gassing up republicans right now so republicans stay home thinking it's all in the bag.
>>
The Democrats keep missing the mark with their minority-coalition voter base. They think they can put up an annoying, nasally harpy as their prime candidate and have black and brown men to fall in line because she's a Jamaican-Indian pretending to be "black". These cultures have a degree of aggressive machismo in their male populations that Whites get derided for participating in. No self-respecting minority-male voter wants to be cowed by an annoying shrew who's voice sounds like a sandpaper enema.
>>
>>523631258
Not to mention that the Dems keep insisting upon pushing faggots on the niggers and spics who will never support them. Buttigieg failed spectacularly for a reason.
>>
>>523631189
Are you saying everybody loves trump and he's doing a brilliant job?
>>
>>523631380
I'm saying you watch far too much mainstream news and it's patently obvious that you do.
>>
>>523622457
the presidential elections are not the california bar exams. they dont let every mouthbreather pass at their second try
>>
>>523631149
>NUMBERS GO BRRR
>I LIKE NUMBERS
>NUMBERS ARE TRUE

this is you btw
>>
Newsome has a chance until people start discovering how shitty he runs CA. The vocal majority will make it seem like hes going to win easy, only to lose. Which will be a repeat of 2016 and 2024.
>>
>>523631422
>>523631509
Why does everybody disapprove of him if he's doing a brilliant job anons
>>
>>523631189
>>still believing polls after 2016
the polls in 2016 were unreal. i forget his name, but some twitter fucker was pointing out that all the polls were giving ~+6 to dems because of the previous election. that dude turned out to be right and trump won. polls are fucked. plus if any pollster calls me i will hang up. probably the same for many right leaning voters.
>>
>>523631607
Polls are also ridiculously weighted by the fact that if you polled 200 normies, and 800 antifatards, the normies would answer reasonably based upon limited knowledge while the antifatards would tank all scores by automatically rating Trump the lowest possible out of retarded spite.
And if you don't know the polling data, or the methodology used, then you can't even begin to trust the outcome.
They do this on purpose.
>>
>actual politician? lmao terrible choice, we should elect a billionaire fraud with no political experience instead
/pol/ moment
>>
>>523631602
>Why does everybody disapprove of him if he's doing a brilliant job anons
republicans have disdain for pollsters and won't answer polls. they probably focus on democrat areas because of this.
>>
>>523631871
cope
>>
>>523631852
>"billionaire fraud"
vs
>person who went into politics 20 years ago with a -3k net worth and is now worth 200 million despite only making government pension income
>>
>>523631831
>Polls are also ridiculously weighted by the fact that if you polled 200 normies,
i identify as a normie. if some random person calls me and wants my opinion, i get angry. as soon as i say nigger, they hang up.
>>
My favorite one is Ihan Omar.
>in office since 2018
>only has government as official income
>dirt poor prior
>now worth 30m

>"Le BlUmPh iS a FrAuD!!!1111111one"
>>
>>523631852
That’s just elitist worshipping liberalism. >Politicians must come from a class of people and the lifelong ones are most effective
Said no intelligent citizen of a Republic ever
>>
>>523631989
>cope
nice meme from 2019....you're a faggot...now that's timeless
>>
>>523632165
>My favorite one is Ihan Omar.
somewhat depressing that foreigners know how to game the system better than americans.
>>
>>523632492
Shitlibs have been eerily silent on that whole affair. I think even the most staunch leftoid is aware of how bad it looks.
>>
File: maxresdefault (2).jpg (12 KB, 195x259)
12 KB
12 KB JPG
>>523622457
NOPE!

Go on a book tour with Hilary if you want an audience but the book club grannies might be a hostile crowd.
>>
>>523632555
>Shitlibs have been eerily silent on that whole affair. I think even the most staunch leftoid is aware of how bad it looks.
so bernie sanders has a net worth of 2M according to google. if she's actually worth 30M that's fucking insane. i would actually have more respect for sanders if these numbers are true.
>>
>>523633012
If you don't think Sanders hasn't been squirreling away money into hidden accounts for decades at this point, then I don't know what to tell you.
Ilhan, on the other hand, is just stupid enough to not hide the fact that she's part of the largest welfare fraud scandal in decades.
>>
File: 1721786631295067.jpg (45 KB, 485x353)
45 KB
45 KB JPG
>>
>>523622457
The Democrats weren't willing to give Hillary a second shot at the White House. Why would they give Harris another go? She can run if she wants but historically Democrats move on from losers and go with a new candidate. It might be a "woman of color" but it won't be Kamala Harris.
>>
>>523633411
i don't know what to believe and i don't have the tools, or the time, to do a deep dive in to any of this shit.
>>
>>523622457
Her chances are good now the Americans realize they should have voted for her
>>
>>523633658
they could copy the republican playbook and run her thinking that trump lost in 2020, so why not her?
>>
0 chance
>>
>>523622457
>Monkey scheming for more bananas
>>
>>523622457
Just according to the prophecy of the simpsons. Either kamala Harris or Hillary Clinton will win next 2028



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.