[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: file.png (660 KB, 1280x641)
660 KB
660 KB PNG
Russians have now sunk several barges at the entrance of their naval port pier in Novorossiys, Russians literally barricaded themselves. Embarrassing...
>>
>>523787085
Reminds me that time when they started to fuck up their own roads to slow down Prigozhin.
>>
>>523787085
This would be a likely situation for sabotage in any other country, yet this is Russia.
>>
>>523787085
Does it make ukraine the winner?
>>
Please go back to your containment thread Ivan.
>>
>>523787085
You what would useful and could over that those barges right now? Tomahwaks
>>
File: youmissedlmfao.jpg (240 KB, 1920x1080)
240 KB
240 KB JPG
>>523787085
so that's the new cope for missing the target? KEK
>>
>>523787085
They can just pump the water out and refloat them lol.
>>
>>523789177
Can you show us a picture that the russians took of the rear end of the submarine? I saw one they posted saying "the submarine is fine" but mysteriously didn't show the end that was at the explosion only the front three quarters KEK
>>
>>523787597
Yes, actually, it makes Ukraine the de facto winner of the Battle for the Black Sea.
Pretty impressive for a country without a conventional navy, desu
>>
>>523787085
It's not a naval war, so it makes sense.
>>
File: 1738769253337557.png (301 KB, 398x702)
301 KB
301 KB PNG
>>523789177
Found it, they took a video and started it not showing the stern KEK
>>
>>523787085
This is brilliant tactical move. Now hohols can stay outside and die while Russia is safe
>>
File: Russian_cruiser_Moskva.jpg (2.45 MB, 1920x950)
2.45 MB
2.45 MB JPG
>>523791964
>It's a land war
>Not a naval war!
Where have I heard that before?
>>
>>523791482
but they are floating
>>
>>523791482
Do you understand that they have blocked their own fleet in the port because they are cowards?
>>
>>523792222
>please no strategy
Youre done polack ukroshit. You became openly an enemy.
>>
File: 1765032046617382.png (14 KB, 1164x1080)
14 KB
14 KB PNG
Retarded nigger:
1. They are floating.
2. We don't need fleet until Odessa Invasion Operation will commence.

Yet you are still trying to cope with the fact that your attempt to destroy a submarine failed. Continue coping.
Z.
>>
>>523792126
I don't know what point you are trying to prove. The war will not be won or lost on the water. Naval actions are a curio here, nothing more.
>>
>>523787294
project blue beam on Russia would be fatal to the country. They would burn everything.
>>
>>523792539
>russians can't into logistics we didn need the sea
classic znigger
>>
>>523792539
Ships assist in air defense, they launch ballistic missiles and they provide logistics and transportation.
As Vatnik-kun here is stating >>523792441 denying Russian naval assets access to the Black Sea hinders their potential to invade Odessa, and sets the stage for a potential Ukrainian invasion of Crimea.

The ways of war are too complex for your feeble mind
>>
>>523792810
>sets the stage for a potential Ukrainian invasion of Crimea.

HAHAHAHA

This leaf is fucking delusional. The Ukrainian Fleet is non-existant, jeet. They have zero maritime capabilites to invade Crimea.
>>
>>523793006
At this rate they could probably swim across, desu
>>
>>523787085
Russia blocked all anime websites
>>
>>523793400
i heard they blocked roblox and are currently facing an uprising of 5-15 year olds.
>>
>>523787085
If the barges are deep enough that the ships can still leave port then I believe their purpose is to guard against anything entering while submerged. They are essentially trying to submarine-proof their port. Not sure how well it'll work, but whatever... Weird actions are taken in the heat of battle to defend, and to destroy, targets.
>>
>>523787085
You missed, nafo pidor.
>>
>>523787597
I mean it protects the subs, but without access to sea it's essentially a self inflicted mobility kill.

Unless they intend to fire the Kalibrs from within city... not sore it would even work in such a small space. And AFAIK the exhaust they produce, especially while ejecting, detaching initial boosters and correcting course is highly toxic.
>>
>>523793786
Anon, if they're deep why can we see them from fucking space?
>>
Ukraine going for the fleet that is just chilling inside a port to get ANY SORT OF WIN in the news is what's embarrassing.
>>
File: 1765900466662893.png (20 KB, 538x480)
20 KB
20 KB PNG
Didn't the Russians sink a civilian freight ship in the harbor when they took Crimea?
Wanted to google it but it was impossible to find anything but the entire Russian navy sunk twice-
>>
>>523792810
>and sets the stage for a potential Ukrainian invasion of Crimea.
lol
>>
>>523794297
You know submarines can launch cruise missiles right? Wanna guess if submarines have launched cruise missiles at Ukraine?
>>
>>523794437
Let's put things out in the open
The war isn't close to ending; even with continuous and mounting pressure from the US, Ukraine has not capitulated or agreed to concede any territory.
The war is escalating; What with the Trump admin forsaking NATO and its European allies, it is looking more and more likely that Europe will go to war with Russia

So, with those facts on the table, it can be understood that Ukraine's dominance of the Black Sea would be a major part of a potential invasion of Crimea. Will this happen soon? Of course not, but if the war continues until the end of the decade, there is no reason to assume Ukraine could not build an invasion fleet for the early 2030s.
Stranger things have happened.
>>
>>523787085

Useless....next hits will likely come from air then.
>>
>>523787294
>Prigozhin was a threat
Anon are you tarded?
>>
>>523791830
>we're winning the naval war
Kek
>>
>>523792008
Holy fucking retard, did you just seriously post RFE here?
Go back
>>
>>523787085
something tells me at least one of those is slightly buoyant and can be pulled to the side in minutes
>>
>>523791679
>Can you show us a picture that the russians took of the rear end of the submarine? I saw one they posted saying "the submarine is fine" but mysteriously didn't show the end that was at the explosion only the front three quarters KEK

Its still floating, so whatever damage it took, was not serious enough to sink it.
>>
>>523794084
They don't seem concerned with collateral damage. They'd probably do it.
>>
>>523792539
> we didn't need the baltic fleet anyway
>>
>>523797391
So, all they would have to do is send some tiny torpedo drones to punch some holes in it and it would be stuck in place?
>>
File: fun times 2023-06-24.png (529 KB, 525x711)
529 KB
529 KB PNG
>>523797097
Australiyski oblast?
>>
>>523787085
So they should just leave it open for attacks instead?
>>
>>523798728
They should prevent the attacks from happening in the first place, anon-kun
>>
>>523794084
They don't need subs or ships to fire Kalibr missiles at Ukraine. They can use Iskander-K trucks to fire them from Crimea.
>>
>>523787085
>>523787085
How embarrasing
Have the real.photo, faggot

>https://africa.businessinsider.com/military-and-defense/satellite-images-show-russia-fortified-a-port-against-ukrainian-drone-boats-one-broke/q2vwb4p
>>
>>523787085
This makes sense as a stopgap solution. The Russian Black Sea fleet is locked into the Black Sea due to the Montreaux convention. And it is not needed in the Black Sea at this time.
>>
>>523798728
Its fake
>>
File: 1710004243273321.jpg (173 KB, 962x1024)
173 KB
173 KB JPG
>>523798728
how about they use their navy to patrol and keep the attacks from happening to begin with.
>>
>>523799209
You mean like with.Yemen?
>>
>>523799209
There is no point. Ukraine has an effectively infinite supply of sea drones. Russia cannot shoot at the factories that build the parts for the sea drones, because they are located outside Ukraine. Neither can the Russians shoot at the satellites and aircraft that provide the data link and targeting data. Thus, no matter how well the Russian warships perform, it is a mathematical inevitability that they will eventually lose against the drone spam.

The appropriate counter to Ukraine's drone boats is aviation, especially Orion drones. The appropriate counter to Ukraine's undersea drones is to block off the access routes as in picrel.
>>
>>523792126
The fact that they are hitting pigostan hohols
with Kalibr missiles from a ship ,
don't make it a naval war.
>>
>>523799615
It's an all-aspects war; total war, if you will.
>>
>>523797556
>destroying the part that makes you move isn't a big deal
kek
>>523797311
>RFE
you see that little watermark that says "russian defence ministry" over the video you fucking plank? neck yourself lmaoooooo
>>
>>523792810
>sets the stage for a potential Ukrainian invasion of Crimea

ROFLMAO

Good one. Ukraine can't take back shit on land but they're going to do an amphibious operation with no navy, manpower shortages and no air superiority.
Last time they tried to land anybody in Crimea they sent two dozen spec ops on speed boats and got BTFO'd on the beach before they could even do their little PR stunt.
>>
>>523796985
I thought you were trolling, but you are actually serious...
Wow you are fucking retarded.
>>
>>523800004
They took back Kupiansk, didn't they?
>>
>>523800244
When do you think this war will end?
>>
>>523787085
They can shoot Kalibr, Onyx, and Zircon missiles from their own ports from the subs and battleships that are already docked.
Barricading themselves is actually smart. Blocking submarine drones and other marine drones from reaching their assets.
Their missiles can still reach Ukraine.
>>
>>523787085
Those docked ships became the proverbial fish in a barrel.
>>
>>523800478
This anon doesn't know that their ballistic missiles are launched from their torpedo bays.
No, no they can't.
>>
>>523800552
Lol no. Kalibr’s are launched vertically, as well as Zircon and Onyx missiles. You are confusing with the torpedo missile which are launched from the torpedo bays.
>>
File: 1696850092361424.png (317 KB, 682x633)
317 KB
317 KB PNG
>>523800478
>Blocking submarine drones and other marine drones from reaching their assets
And turning your assets into sitting ducks for Cessnas and Stormshadows
>>
File: russian new navy.jpg (218 KB, 1200x798)
218 KB
218 KB JPG
>>523789177
>actually, a huge explosion near the propeller that destroyed a reinforced concrete dock is good for the submarine.
talk about the new cope
>>
>>523800765
A Kalibr missile can be launched from either a torpedo tube, or a vertical silo, or a truck. It is 533mm in diameter specifically so that it can fit in a torpedo tube.
>>
>>523800765
>Kalibr’s are launched vertically, as well as Zircon and Onyx missiles.
This.
>>523800478
>They can shoot Kalibr, Onyx, and Zircon missiles from their own ports from the subs and battleships that are already docked.
>Barricading themselves is actually smart. Blocking submarine drones and other marine drones from reaching their assets.
>Their missiles can still reach Ukraine.
This anon is correct.
>>
>>523800529
A ship is slower than a missile or drone anyway. It doesn't matter if the ship is mobile or static; it can't outrun a drone or missile. And Ukraine knows at all times where Russian ships are, due to reconnaissance by NATO satellites and aircraft.
>>
>>523787085
>>523792222
>nooooo, you can't defend yourself from nato attacks, you have to let nato kill you without doing anything
>t. nafo tranny
Kek, this thread
>>
File: 1663227173939370.png (624 KB, 643x757)
624 KB
624 KB PNG
>>523789177
Xaxaxa stupid xoxol didnt do any damage.
Da, we don't need our largest port any more.
Drown barges immediately!
>>
>>523801050
>It doesn't matter if the ship is mobile or static
it does matter if the ship is in a dock with a bunch of other ships and near the infrastructure/city. Because if they decide to launch a missile from a docked ship they could inadvertently his another ship or object if the launch fails.
>>
File: 1648118458020.png (819 KB, 1048x675)
819 KB
819 KB PNG
>>523801050
>we actually don't need to move our ships any more
>>
>>523800765
>>523800997
Except they're Kilo class submarines and don't have vertical launch tubes.
You guys should really just look this shit up lmao
>>
>>523801400
Why would they launch missiles from docked ships, when they can launch the missiles from Iskander-K trucks instead?
>>
>>523801512
Russian warships currently cannot leave the Black Sea due to the Montreaux convention. What task is there for Russian warships to perform in the Black Sea that justifies the risk? Fighting boat drones? That task is better handled by aviation. Attacking ships going to and from Ukraine? That task is better handled by aviation or by coastal batteries.
>>
Its a fake pic morons

Real pic here
(Image upload fails)

>https://africa.businessinsider.com/military-and-defense/satellite-images-show-russia-fortified-a-port-against-ukrainian-drone-boats-one-broke/q2vwb4p
>>
>>523792222
it's from the 1905 russian Port Arthur defense playbook. Someone thought it would be a great idea to try it again, maybe it will work out well this time.
>>
>>523800529
Its a fake pic retard
>>
>>523792222
>they're only able to move barges once, after that they lose the ability to move barges again
this is almost as retarded as thinking refineries can't be repaired
>>
>>523800840
Cessnas have many many many double barrel machine guns that are deployed around the base to destroy them, not only Cessnas but also smaller drones.
>Storm Shadows
The S500 is in Crimea, the Novorussye base have Tor systems, Pantsir S3 and lots of other heavier systems as well as aviation ready to destroy any aerial threat. Notice how Storm shadows stopped doing anything since the S500 was deployed in Crimea ?
>>523800911
As well as torpedo tubes yes. Leaf anon said can be launched only from torpedo bays which is false. Kalibr is a versatile munition yes.
>>523801593
False the improved Kilo class subs are Kalibr capable:
>On 9 December 2015, Russia fired a group of 3M14K cruise missiles from Kalibr-PL system at positions occupied by ISIL from the Improved Kilo-class submarine B-237 Rostov-on-Don deployed in the Mediterranean
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalibr_(missile_family)

The ones in Rostov are all improved Kilo class subs.
>>
>>523801739
>That task is better handled by aviation
russians have lost a number of helicopters over the Black Sea to the Ukrainian naval Magura V5 drones.
>>
>>523802247
so there are no barges blocking the docks? What's this in the image from your link?
>>
>>523802655
Russians are also fielding helicopter drones as well as heavy lift attack/recon drones like the Aarak, and the Orion. They already built lots of them now being deployed, if you see less helicopters it does not mean they are butt naked they are just adapting.
>>523801739
>Muh Montreux accords
Russians are enlarging the Canal that transports ships from St Petersburg to Novorussyie, and China are helping them enlarge it, that way heavy ships will enter the black sea regardless of what the roaches have to say.
>>
>>523802274
>refineries can't be repaired
sure they can, but it's not a quick job if a distillation column or two are hit. It stops the whole operation for months. If a number of refineries are hit in the area it becomes a major issue down the supply chain, all the way down to the oil fields.
>>
>>523803435
>months
Zero refineries are currently shut down
>>
>>523803131
Yes they are CLEARLY floating. Not sunk. Some faggot on X photoshopped them sunk
>>
>>523802446
Uhh-huh, and those Kalibr missiles are launched how, exactly?
>>
>>523803630
Read what this anon said : >>523800911
From ships, subs, and even trucks. You can place those silo tubes in many platforms.
>>
File: 1719701442227273.png (816 KB, 899x1199)
816 KB
816 KB PNG
>>523802446
>S500 was deployed in Crimea
It was droned 3 months ago lol. How can S500 protect the harbor if it can't protect itself?
>>
File: 1762493145664938.png (145 KB, 950x841)
145 KB
145 KB PNG
>>523803435
>t.
>>
>>523803592
Hohols did not hit a sub during their attack but they hit a dig behind the sub. Some say it was a demonstration from Nato to tell Russia we could hit your subs if we wanted, some others claim Ukrainians being hohols completely missed. In all cases it thought Russians to close off the entrance of their base with barges in case of future attacks.
>>
File: Kilo Class AI slop.png (24 KB, 486x116)
24 KB
24 KB PNG
>>523803750
Anon, the kilo class submarines do not have vertical launch tubes.
The Kalibr missile can be fired from torpedo tubes.
Kilo class submarines with Kalibr missiles launch their Kalibr missiles through their torpedo tubes.
They cannot fire their missiles from inside of the blockaded port of Novorossyisk because they fire their missiles through their torpedo tubes.

TL;DR shut the fuck up
>>
>>523803916
Yes I believe the Buisness Insider photo but the X version with the shooped sunk ships is retarded
>>
File: desert2.jpg (111 KB, 715x667)
111 KB
111 KB JPG
>>523796985
Ukraine has 20,000 troops a month going AWOL, it wont last a year let alone 10
>>
File: 1747803862395000.jpg (174 KB, 695x900)
174 KB
174 KB JPG
>>523794297
what?
>flagship cruiser Moskva
>most notably sinking

reading about ukraine the anglo comments are just sad. bunch of pussyfree incels trying to be edgy towards people that fight for their lifes.

why are so many of you so sorry fucking bastards.
>>
>>523804148
>According to one analysis
lol
lmao, even
>>
File: 1691146026259371.jpg (100 KB, 1280x672)
100 KB
100 KB JPG
>>523801739
>w-we don't need the ships
>it's a land war
Same cope every fucking time while russia struggles to squeeze a drop of military utility from it's rustbuckets.
>>
its guys that look like the desert president of /pol forgothis name, i dont care.

you look like shit, your brain is a turd, thats your life, nigger.
>>
File: 1717997156578081.jpg (291 KB, 1280x720)
291 KB
291 KB JPG
>>523804307
LMAO Saddam Husein
>>
>>523803770
Well I had to look since I was not aware of the attack, hohols claim it was the S500 Prometheus radar 55R6M "Triumfator-M", but the Russians have listed the targets that were hit:
— Utyos-T coastal radar
— RT-70 radio telescope
— GLONASS complex (under protective dome)
— MR-10M1 “Cape” coastal radar
— 96L6-AP radar (part of S-400 system)

The S500 radar’s was not hit. Nevertheless that attack did hurt the Russian radar complexe.
>>
>>523804074
Indeed you clearly see dirt blowing up on the original video.
>>
>>523804004
Ask it again but with the “Improved Kilo-class submarine B-237” which are Kalibr capable.
https://www.19fortyfive.com/2022/03/meet-the-kilo-the-russian-submarine-the-us-navy-calls-the-black-hole/
>>
>>523804821
THERE ARE NO VERTICAL LAUNCH TUBES ON KILO CLASS SUBMARINES, ANON
HOW MANY FUCKING TIMES DO I NEED TO TELL YOU THIS?
>>
>>523804192
You think Europe will go to war with Russia, and you call others retarded?
What the fuck is even "Europe"? Does "Europe" have a standing army?
>>
>>523805281
Who did I call retarded?
>>
>>523804927
You are right. They can only launch from the torpedo bays. Your capital letters made all the difference, I had to look again.
That being said, Im pretty sure they need a short distance to take off, even from inside the base they would be able to launch from the torpedo bay and take off to their destination.
>>
>>523805483
Pray tell, anon-who-makes-shit-up, how many meters from the launch tube does the Kalibr missile need before it exits the surface of the water?
>>
>>523803508
>>523803771
>Zero refineries are currently shut down
LMAO, Examples of non-operational refineries:
Ryazan Refinery: Suspended operations in November 2025 after a drone attack.
Syzran Refinery: Shut down in December 2025 due to an attack.
Novokuibyshevsk Refinery: Ceased operations in August 2025.
The situation remains dynamic, and many plants are still unable to restore full operational capacity.

"Due to drone attacks, Russian oil refineries will not be able to reach full capacity until at least the summer of 2026."
https://oilcapital.ru/news/2025-10-15/mea-vosstanovlenie-raboty-rossiyskih-npz-na-polnuyu-moschnosti-mozhet-zanyat-god-5491727?utm_source=google.com&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=google.com&utm_referrer=google.com
>>
>>523804148
>brought to you by RT (russia today)
>>
>>523805607
How many meters? Obviously I can only estimate images and scarce and information too, but the Kalibr is a highly dynamic missile, I would say 1000 meters.
In all I trust the Russians to know their shit, if they closed the bay it’s for the better.
https://tass.com/defense/969183
>>
>>523806097
>I trust
>The Russians
Yessss, closing down your largest port is actually a good thing, didn't you know?
Russia didn't need it anyways.
>>
>>523793006
>we just made ourselves the same as the shithole ukraine and now neither of have maritime capabilities in the black sea xaxaxa
Sounds more like they have a bunch of naval drones and now you don't have anything.
>>
>>523806097
>I trust the Russians to know their shit
KEK, that's your biggest mistake. There's a russian saying that encompasses the situation in: "there are two problems in russsia - the fools and the roads."
>>
>>523805676
This is true, the 3 refineries were hit, Ryazan was hit for the 2nd time, it was hit in 2023 then restored, then hit again.
The others are in reparations, it will take time to restore, it’s like Command&Conquer. But Russia has 46 oil refineries, it’s impossible to shut all down. And 40% of those are in the far east. If Ukraine reach to shut down just even 30% of the total Refineries but sure that Kiev would get nuked on that very day. The Russian system takes attacks on their oil infrastructure very seriously.
>>
>>523806365
Implying Kalibrs cannot be launched from normal battleships or even trucks.
>>523806592
For war problems, I trust Russians to find solutions.
>>
>>523806687
30% of 46 is 14, and Google-AI-sama is telling me 21 refineries were hit.
Going out on a limb here, but I'm getting the feeling that when you say things, the things you say might not necessarily be true, desu
>>
>>523806827
Implying the equivalent tonnage in trade from Russia's largest port can be diverted elsewhere, anon-kun
>>
>>523804192
>>523805741
Just full cope mode then?
>>
>>523806904
You said Ukraine won't even last a year, I see no reason why to think that's even remotely close to the truth. It's really not that deep.
>>
File: yvq8cg4paa651.jpg (37 KB, 1010x542)
37 KB
37 KB JPG
>>523791830
Wait, if they win then why do they lose territory?
>>
>>523806846
AI is full of shit, I got 14 on my side. 14 out of 46. I guess Ukraine is really close to get nuked. Even 14 is too much. Putin should send them nukes. If I were him i would. Starting with Berlin and London, then finishing with Kiev.
>>
>>523806687
>the 3 refineries were hit
there were many more hit, these are just the major examples.
>40% of those are in the far east.
and yet they have fuel shortages in Vladivostock. You don't realize what it means in the russian style logistics, where most people actually live in the European part and there are 7 time zones between them and the refineries.
>takes attacks on their oil infrastructure very seriously.
obviously not, and they can't even make their own parts for modern distillation columns
>>
>>523806827
>fFor war problems, I trust russians to find solutions
Why? When someone else isn't taking care of their logistics they're not very good.
>>
>>523791830
By the end of the war Ukraine will be effectively land locked. Thanks to their “courageous” black sea battles. Impressive my ass.
>>
>>523806827
>I trust Russians to find solutions.
russia has lost plenty of wars to smaller opponents. Look up the Russo-Japanese war of 1904-1905. It was the catalyst to the fall of the russian empire and czar Nicholas the 2nd in 1917.
>>
>>523807032
If they thought they could last another year I doubt they would be offering to drop their NATO membership demand to get a peace agreement
>>
>>523807043
I'll actually take the bait and give you a relatively concise break-down, off the dome.
Territorial advancements in the Russo-Ukrainian war are undeniable; there has been a steady rate of advancement from the Russian side.
This rate of advancement, however, has been extremely slow. Now, in a perfect world, a constant rate of advancement would be enough to win any war.
But we don't live in a perfect world. There are factors beyond "meters gained per hundred thousand casualties" that come into account.
If you think about the last hundred years, entire empires have fallen despite "winning" on the battlefield. Russia has experienced several such collapses in the past hundred years.
If we look at WW2 for example, and specifically the Nazi regime, we can see an extremely high rate of advancement, cumulating in many, many countries completely annexed.
However, their ambitions did not stop, and they fundamentally outgrew their own logistics and pouvoir de gouvernance.
The collapse of the Nazi regime was so complete that, not only did they lose most of their territory gained, they lost the sovereignty of their nation.
If we look at the Russo-Ukrainian war, we see that Russia has failed to achieve any of it's stated objectives. Though it can be argued, very legitimately, that Russia is well on it's way to achieving said objectives, it cannot be stated with certainty that Russia can or will complete those objectives before the total collapse of their regime.
The reason I believe that they will collapse far before they occupy the entirety of Ukraine is because of the nature of the conflict; the frontline is extraordinarily long, the casualty rates are staggering and the logistical situation in Russia is increasingly difficult.
Add to this growing international pressure, the possibility of a European front opening up and the increasing breadth of capabilities between Ukrainian and Russian weapons, I find it logical to conclude that Russia is incapable of winning.
>>
>>523807431
I don't think you understand that saying things for media updoots is not the same as doing them.
>>
>>523807399
The Czar did not have nukes.
>>523807190
That’s fucked. We are closer to the nuke option than any other times before. Shit will get real. Russia cannot and will not lose this. Touching the refineries is suicidal from Ukraine and their backers.
>>
>>523807431
they're doing it to placate the orange retard, because the orange retard believes pootin when pootin says the war is about the NATO expansion. Which is a lie, so, since the orange retard won't put pressure on pootin, for his own reasons, he's making Ukraine back off from NATO aspirations.
>>
>>523807677
Noooooook posting? In 2025?
>>
>>523804927
>>523804004
They can very simply tilt the submarine up and yeet the missiles up out of the water from the torpedo tubes
>>
File: adutp1.jpg (64 KB, 700x467)
64 KB
64 KB JPG
>>523807621
> They don't win fast enough
Keep us posted
>>
>>523807853
Well at least everyone was warned for years prior. That would the most beautiful finish for the rainbow flag hosts. As if coming from God himself.
>>
>>523798921
Well those sunk barges would.
>>
>>523787085
My hypothesis is Starlink actually is off over Novorossiya port, so they did have to navigate through the hacked security camera, also probably an observer to bring the UUV into the security camera view. It would have been surfacing, beaconing, and correcting, in combination with some rudimentary INS or even just a compass. But - that explains the non-contact (or miss if you're not NAFO).
>>
>>523787085
if it works...
>>
File: submarine cope cage.jpg (113 KB, 604x900)
113 KB
113 KB JPG
remember when they dug trenched at fucking chernobyl red forest?
>>
File: CHERNO_110319_17545.jpg (2.53 MB, 3072x2048)
2.53 MB
2.53 MB JPG
>>523808245
The forest is safe if you don't actually eat anything you find there. People go there all the time, it's literally one of the biggest Ukrainian tourist destinations.
>>
>>523807819
Explain Nato refusing Russia’s application in the 90’s then explain Nato’s broken promise “not to move one inch east of Germany”.
Orange man and Putin are both right, Nato is being the aggressor here.
Also Nato= Rothschild’s orders. And Putin chased away the Rothschild’s banks in 2008.
>>
>>523808543
They saw the opportunity.
Russia was weak, broken by neoliberalism, and they acted fast.
Let's not fool ourselves, If the Soviet Union had the chance, they too would have seized more power.
>>
File: 1464866601923.png (96 KB, 332x333)
96 KB
96 KB PNG
>>523787085
The naval port should have deep gate
>>
>>523797097
>just a prank, bro
>>
>>523808521
it's not safe, only the main roads and some attractions are, because they were washed down multiple times over the years. If you step a meter or two off the road the Geiger counter starts going crazy. This was shown is several documentaries by the guides.
>>
>>523808640
Having 2 strong powers, holding 2 different system was insuring global peace, also it was more fair to the “people” of both sides. Capitalism that existed in before the fall of the USRR was treating their workers with more respect and more rights, because the other ideology existed and had to be treated fairly by fear of defecting to the other side. From the 50’s to the end of 80’s, big corporations built houses and offered them at cost to their workers, they built large leisure centers for their workers to relax, and had a comprehensive health coverage. All this ceased to exist as soon as the Soviet Union collapsed. Capitalism being the victor of the 2, changed attitude towards their own workers, “productivity” took over which is a code word for more work less pay, and efficiency followed which is a code word we will spend less more for our worker’s happiness and redirect those funds into making for corporate profits. Today capitalism is full on predatory towards its citizens, planning to replace workers with AI and automation, for more profits, even seeing humans as useless eaters, wanting to chip us like cattle, literally.
You see, we all lose when one side collapse, the sweet spot is when 2 powers/ideology compete by pleasing and offering comfort to their own populace/workers.
Boomers had the greatest time because they lived in a time where the 2 system competed. That being said, Im not for one side or the other, but for more equality for people, and maximized happiness for people of the world.
>>
>>523808077
Only twelve million more dead ziggers until Nu York
>>
>>523809292
See you when Odessa is Russian again. SMO will turn into full on war. Then I will pray for nukes to fly.
>>
They could have used thick fish netting
>>
>>523809398
Fish net will break if a swarm of drones come in, one blows the net and the others penetrate the base.
>>
>>523807171
You're literally a gay shitskin lol
No wonder you like Russoid cock so much
>>
>>523796985
>Trump admin forsaking NATO and its European allies
No, we've been telling them to stand up for decades, they have refused. Now, unelected EU bureaucrats are crybullying Europe into a war against Russia, while Herr Monke in the Kremlin goes along with it. We're apparently going to step back and let you idiots slaughter each other.
>>
>>523809387
That's . . . optimistic
If you would consult the rest of this thread, what's left of the black sea fleet is hiding in the cuck pen at Novorossiysk lmao
>>
>523809805
gore status?
/uhg/ status?
>>
>>523797097
>retcons events that happened less than 4 years ago
only excuse is you literally being 10 at the time
>>
>>523809577
>why you like Russia
Balance is good. Having one power butt fucking every one is bad for everyone.
Same reason why I stand with China, against their aggressors.
The last thing we need is a super powerful pole that have leaders that are drug addict and homosexuals (the West). It’s even better to have the west nuked at this point, then rebuilt more fairly from scratch.
>>
How come a major military port has zero anti torpedo/submarine nets, coastal sonar, mines, and blast doors?

WW2 germany had all of this on any important port, there is even a story of a german port being so impenetrable to naval and air attacks the brits had to rig up an entire destroyer full of bombs so they could ram it into the port to blow a hole in it
>>
>>523809805
According to you, Russia was collapsing since Mars 2022. And Ukraine is winning since June 2022. Are you related to the Ghost of Kiev by any chance?
>>
>>523799837
>defending RFE
Go back troon
>>
>>523804414
kek
>>
File: novoziggersk-harbour.jpg (51 KB, 640x517)
51 KB
51 KB JPG
>>523787085
How many missiles will it take to hit something in this small confined space with many zigger ships in it?
>>
>>523787085
>mongolopid pidors mad at missing Russian submarine, even the wall is barely scratched
>create yet another fake to gloat in their subhuman delusion while their already african tier shithole is getting even more unlivable (even by their standards)
Its like they just cannot accept the fact what they are racial subhumans which are dying in meat waves while Russians laugh at fragging brown porkos like its a videogame. You killed one Russian? 20 mongloid orcs dying from your side. You send one 10 kg drone to attack Russian refinery which will be repaired in a week? Catch a barrage of 200kg rockets flattering to a state it was before Russia build it for the local mongolo turkish mutts. Until moral improves, kind humanitarian and legal svinorez will continue, its that simple, repent, pay reparation to Russia, send already naturally bred slaves to serve Russians and spend every hour of your life thanking the white master for saving your life, its that simple.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.