[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: F2.large.jpg (154 KB, 1280x1185)
154 KB
154 KB JPG
Intepreted as autistic deficits: failure to consider social reputation, inflexibility, over-sensitivity to immoral actions

Autistics vs controls "were much more likely to reject the opportunity to earn ill-gotten money by supporting a bad cause"

https://www.jneurosci.org/content/41/8/1699
>>
File: comfy.gif (40 KB, 640x410)
40 KB
40 KB GIF
>>523848348
>failure to consider social reputation
Wasn't considered, or was indifferent to? There's a difference.
>inflexibility
So, structured?
> over-sensitivity to immoral actions
Without questionable morals?

So autists are moral, structured, and possibly also, esteemed enough to be self-validating and therefore indifferent to external validation?
So Chads are Autists? And "normal" people are betas?
>>
>>523849304
yeah basically
>>
File: uncletedcabin.jpg (12 KB, 275x183)
12 KB
12 KB JPG
>>523850153
Then I wonder why "autistic" seems to be used as a label for someone who is "deficient", implying inferiority? and why people want to be labeled "Chads", but not "Autistics"?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.