/pol/ - >MUH ARTICLE 5 How are the NAFO cuckolds dealing w - Politically Incorrect

Anonymous (ID: zq5H4Iek) Archived

12/18/25(Thu)13:14:49 No.523855224

File: G8dzdnMWcA0sMx7 (1).jpg (68 KB, 633x471)

68 KB JPG

Anonymous (ID: zq5H4Iek) 12/18/25(Thu)13:14:49 No.523855224 Archived

>MUH ARTICLE 5
How are the NAFO cuckolds dealing with it?

Anonymous (ID: GKlS4Vci)
12/18/25(Thu)13:18:05 No.523855422

Anonymous (ID: GKlS4Vci) 12/18/25(Thu)13:18:05 No.523855422

>>523855224
well, that's it, isn't it?
USA is expected to do all the fighting, but the USA isn't obligated if the EU starts it. With the jingoistic militaristic war rants out of the EU, the USA has a out that is big enough to drive a truck through.

Anonymous (ID: zilBIcO8)
12/18/25(Thu)13:20:15 No.523855578

Anonymous (ID: zilBIcO8) 12/18/25(Thu)13:20:15 No.523855578

>>523855224
>russia invades latvia
>NATO HOLDS SECURITY MEETING!!!!!!
>EU issues sanctions
this is exactly what is going to happen next year
NATO is not ready to fight Ivan without the US
We are not sending troops to die in trenches for europe

Anonymous (ID: 8O8K20ZJ)
12/18/25(Thu)13:24:08 No.523855824

Anonymous (ID: 8O8K20ZJ) 12/18/25(Thu)13:24:08 No.523855824

>>523855578
>We are not sending troops to die in trenches for europe

Exactly. And we need to stop sending our troops to die for anyone other than Americans.

Of course I would like some of our European frens to answer the following: How do you feel knowing your countries all planned everything around security guarantees and promises from the US that we are now making clear we have no intention of honoring?