>source?This one, single word causes endless seethe and cope in right-wing pseudo-intellectuals of /pol/. One could even call it the S-word
>>523871284Is this about the holocaust?
>>523871284Only lefty troons care about sources.
>>523871494My instincts tell me you just sucked a dick and liked it.
>>523871284That's why I provide sources for everything I write
>>523871284>be leftoid arguing in bad faith (oxymoron)>encounter argument in casual setting>can't actually counter the argument>unilaterally decide that it's actually a formal argument and you need to have a bibliography for literally everything you say, gambling that the other guy won't have one so you can instantly win the formal debate you just started>if he has a source, decide that source doesn't count for whatever reason and demand a new one>keep raising the bar for what constitutes a valid source until the only acceptable source is God's personal testimonyWe've figured out that you're usually being disingenuous faggots rather then actually wanting to learn more when you request a source. I've literally had leftists demand sources for mathematics and logical deductions from agreed upon facts.
