[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: epstein transparency.png (468 KB, 1742x840)
468 KB
468 KB PNG
The Epstein transparency act
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%204/EFTA00005946.pdf
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%204/EFTA00006109.pdf
>>
>still not a full release
>>
File: 4543.png (22 KB, 585x266)
22 KB
22 KB PNG
>>523938281
bruh
>>
>>523938281
It was already predicted they would redact everything LMAO
>>
Someone's going to have to sue them one page at a time, and they'll somehow successfully argue that just because they lost the lawsuit to keep that one page redacted doesn't mean they have to unredact any other pages.
>>
>>523938703
how would this possibly work
>your honor i have no idea what's on this page but i deeply feel that it's something i should know as opposed to these other pages
does that make any sense to you
>>
>>523938703
They need to pass the law again with a no redactions except for CSAM stipulation, only way anything comes of it
>>523938875
I think there's bound to be a whistleblower in the coming weeks. It's not possible that every single DOJ employee supports pedophiles
>>
>>523938875
>your honor, the law says they can't redact it
>duhhhhh, well what if it's an entire page of just a victim's name over and over again?
>someone with a clearance reviews page, tells the judge nothing on it is on the short list of things that can be redacted
>judge rules it has to be unredacted
>doj claims that just because they've lost their twentieth case in a row on this exact issue with these exact arguments, they don't have to unredact anything else
>repeat
>>
>>523938875
During the ruleau commision on the canadian governments use of the emergencies act to get rid of the trucker protest, the government was caught redacting key evidence as "irrelevant". How can you trust the organization you are bringing charges against to redact in good faith? You can't and shouldn't
>>
>>523938281
kek did anyone expect anything anything different?
>>
>>523939075
this is going to go on for years, isn't it
>>
>>523939177
I expected them to just not release pages that are incriminating. There are thousands of pages that are just blacked out completely. Not names or faces, but the entire page. Someone had to go through each page and just turn the page black in MS Paint
>>
pedo don trying to save himself and his pedo friends
>>
>>523938281
the epstein beatles act
>>
>>523938281
lmao
>>
File: Capture.png (244 KB, 633x406)
244 KB
244 KB PNG
"drain the swamp"
>>
File: 1748231763536607.png (741 KB, 1280x2311)
741 KB
741 KB PNG
>>523939371
you expect jew rats to play fair? lmfao kys retard
>>
File: capture5.jpg (35 KB, 574x761)
35 KB
35 KB JPG
Bros I don't feel so good
>>
File: redacted.jpg (60 KB, 778x1024)
60 KB
60 KB JPG
>>523938281
>The Epstein transparency act
>>
File: 1736752933378552.png (108 KB, 478x480)
108 KB
108 KB PNG
*yawns*
>>
>>523938281
>predicts the whole document gets redacted
>the whole document actually gets redacted
WOW
>>
File: 1735650462764897.png (742 KB, 2550x3357)
742 KB
742 KB PNG
anyway...
death to america
death to israel
death to globohomo
>>
>>523938281
>>523938281
>>523938281
>>523938281
>>523938281
>https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%204/EFTA00005946.pdf
>https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%204/EFTA00006109.pdf
HOLY FUCK!!!!!!!! THEY'VE FINALLY BEEN RELEASED!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
File: 1749252295269854.png (530 KB, 1079x9370)
530 KB
530 KB PNG
The masseuse list is eild!
Tons of spicy info in it
I assume
>>
test



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.