serious law question, is this not an impeachable offense? he signed for them to be released unredacted
>>523949396the incompetence is a feature not a bug
>>523949396victim information for example is protected. they should only be not cencored if the victims want them to be shared with the public.
>>523949396He signed for it, so he's not responsible, the DOJ is. It's Pam Bondi's head in the guillotine.
>>523949477OP doesnt understand how the zog operates yet
havent hundreds of people read these? whats stopping any of them from just telling us whats in it?
>>523949688A noise ...
>>523949593however, the DoJ was supposed to justify every single redaction and they have not done that
>>523949396i thought only things that would threaten national security were going to be censoredlike 75% of the info in here is redactedi think you understand what that fucking implies
>>523949688What stopped the thousands of government moles from releasing the truth about covid and the vaccine causing heart attacks? Brave humans do not seek federal desk jobs.
>OP>serious reddit question
>>523950170It does threaten national security. Do you really want to blow up the whole economy and government by exposing 90 percent of the business and political leaders? Do you have any idea how much chaos it would produce?
>>523949396I'm embarrassed to live in a country run by pee-philes. Disgusting.
>>523949396Congress decides about impeachment. Everything and nothing is an "impeachable offense" depending if a majority of congress feels like it or not.Better question should be: Where is the summary Bondi was supposed to provide about every redacted page with an explanation what was redacted and why? That was explicitly in the bill.
>>523949835maybe because privacy protection can't just be abolished by an executive order? i don't know the specific us laws.
>>523949396Any incrimination of Trump could lead to backlash against the poor victims so he has to be protected. It is unfortunate but it’s in our best interest to protect Trump
consistent throughout all of this was that victim info would be redacted, that's what was taking the DOJ so fucking long (and it was delayed by Comey's Daughter)
>>523950322Yes and yes
>>523950407I'd love hearing Bondi explain how these guys are victims
>>523949396>released unredactedNo he didnt, you gaping anus power faggot. The law literally told them to do this.
>>523950479pretty fucking sure its more than just the victim info that was redacted hereive looked through about 50 documents, something like a few thousand photos, (because the ones i looked at were huge photo galleries) so far and ive seen 4 total fucking faces
>>523949396So you want president Vance
>>523950604He tricked them into pedophilia and releasing their names is a national security risk. Any more questions, smarty pants?
>>523949396because law does not repeal other laws. Todd Blanche wrote a legal memo about ithttps://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2025/12/epstein-clinton.pdf
Yes. He had sex. He is guilty. It’s not looking good for chuds, pay up now
>>523949396Doesn't matter, what lil Timmy the Democrat gonna do? Write a strongly worded letter? Trump fucked those kids, this hilariously sloppy cover up after screeching autisticly all year is proof enough.
>>523950928kek, wrong link, this is the right one:https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2025/12/blanche-.pdf
>>523949396Thomas Massie already is setting up the impeachment.
>>523950322yes
>>523949835And they will by saying the victims need to agree to redact it.How stupid are you fuckers?
>>523950322Yes?
>>5239493961pbtid faggot kys first of all. But you have a valid and imporant question.If we read the bill (which noone did) we can find out answer.> (1) The Attorney general may withhold or redact the > segregable portions of records that--> (A) contain personally identifiable information of > victims or victims' personal and medical files and > similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a > clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy;> (B) depict or contain child sexual abuse materials > (CSAM) as defined under 18 U.S.C. 2256 and prohibited > under 18 U.S.C. 2252-2252A;> (C) would jeopardize an active federal investigation > or ongoing prosecution, provided that such withholding > is narrowly tailored and temporary;> (D) depict or contain images of death, physical > abuse, or injury of any person; or> (E) contain information specifically authorized > under criteria established by an Executive order to be > kept secret in the interest of national defense or > foreign policy and are in fact properly classified > pursuant to such Executive order.> (2) All redactions must be accompanied by a written > justification published in the Federal Register and submitted to > Congress.(1/2)
>>523950322yes lol
>>523951008The DOJ has redacted them not Trump. also Massie says he has 20 names, is he going to stand in congress and name those names or is he going to larp as per usual?
>>523951299(2/2)>(3) To the extent that any covered information would > otherwise be redacted or withheld as classified information > under this section, the Attorney General shall declassify that > classified information to the maximum extent possible.> (A) <<NOTE: Determination.>> If the Attorney > General makes a determination that covered information > may not be declassified and made available in a manner > that protects the national security of the United > States, including methods or sources related to national > security, the Attorney General shall release an > unclassified summary for each of the redacted or > withheld classified information.> (4) <<NOTE: Effective date.>> All decisions to classify any > covered information after July 1, 2025 shall be published in the > Federal Register and submitted to Congress, including the date > of classification, the identity of the classifying authority, > and an unclassified summary of the justification.>SEC. 3. REPORT TO CONGRESS.>> Within 15 days of completion of the release required under Section >2, the Attorney General shall submit to the House and Senate Committees >on the Judiciary a report listing:> (1) All categories of records released and withheld.> (2) A summary of redactions made, including legal basis.So there are a number of reasons why redactions might be made. Which sounds disappointing, BUT! we will get a report on what was redacted and why it was redacted in 15 days ("of the completion of the release ..." so I guess if they don't finish releasing it today it will be a bit more than that.).As >>523949611 said, failure to comply to the bill would probably not fall on Trump, though, unless he was interfering with the DOJ releasing the files.
>>523951299>We are well within our legal rights to cover up child rape again, for the 1 billionth timeKys poindexter
>>523951008Trumps acolytes truly are retards. Bet they told him to just sign it and they will make "the problem go away in 30 days".Should have just burned down the DoJ and claim it was an immigrant + all the Epstein files are gone woops sorry.
>>523951523Oh, and a bit more to the bill I forgot to paste:>(3) A list of all government officials and politically > exposed persons named or referenced in the released materials, > with no redactions permitted under subsection (b)(1).That was the last of the 3 things that must be included in the report. So we will know, or at least the government will be required to give to Congress a report on all the politicians who are being hidden in the files. Now you can say what you want about the legitimacy of our government and whether they'll actually do that but that's the answer to your question, on the books.The only problem is you're not actually going to read any of this because you're a brigader. Which is unfortunate but plenty of other people can appreciate that they actually read the bill and know the answer to their question.Link to the bill, by the way:https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/4405/text/pl?format=txt
>>523951617massie isnt going to do shit and youre truly a fucking retard for falling for this like a 5th time already. even mtg wised up to his grift lmao
>>523951299>(2) All redactions must be accompanied by a written justification published in the Federal Register and submitted to Congress.This is the critical part. Do you think Bondi did that? That means everyone in congress should have it now.
>>523951716Massie is absolutely going to "do shit".But more importantly so is everyone else. Publishing a giant black bar parade was perhaps the dumbest thing they could have done. They also owe congress a list of summaries for every. single. redacted. file.I haven't heard of anyone having that list yet, though they still have like 4 hours left I suppose.
>>523949396>>52394959399% of it is victim information.
>>523952016Massie will make noise but will be labeled as "Epstein truther," same as we have "9/11 truthers" or "JFK truthers."they don't have the votes to pass another bill or impeach Bondi. nobody wants to re-litigate DOJ redaction technicalities. everyone wants to move on. it is midterm season now.
>>523951776I don't know really. I hope so, I mean she's legally required to have. But crazier things have been gotten away with.>>523951537I get this response a lot when I give people answers they don't like. But maybe if you finished reading it you'd be a bit happier.
>>523949396the dude was running a pedophile ring. You really think every client got 1 girl and that's it? I'm surprised there's not more censored. I'm pretty sure the gov missed a couple nipslips of censored faces.
>>523949835Juan, don't start a sentence with "however". You dumb retard.
>serious question>can the president be impeached because multiple agencies censored some documentsThat's not a serious question that's a retarded question. You just have TDS and your tiny brain only thinks in ways to get back at DRUMPF! for hurting your ass.
>>523950322>B-but think of the poor wealthy business and political leaders and the inflated fake economy!You think I give a shit about preserving what is predicated on lies? kys
>>523950322you must not know who you are talking to buddeath to Uncle Sam and his yenta whore mistress anyways,the conditions for "the next Hitler" are extremely ripe
>>523949396More black bars than a censored Japanese hentai manga. Makes sense too, we are getting fucked by Trump-chan
>>523949396With no enforcement mechanism*Good luck. The law was written to be as pourus as possible while sounding really tough.
>>523949396No, to be impeached you would need a Congress not full of sycophants. Since half or so of Congress licks the shit out of the orange ones ass, he's safe from impeachment.
>>523951197I was going to save this webm because I like rabbits until I saw the full video -_-
>>523952929The DOJ redacted the files no Trump
>>523949396It is an impeachable offense, and what congress should do is impeach Bondi and Patel, and threaten to do trump AND vance next if they don't do it. Put Johnson in as president, then impeach him too.But they won't because they're all fake and gay.
>>523952964Thats a bunny, not a rabbit.
>>523952503"dumb retard" is redundant considering retard implies a lack of intelligence. you're too retarded to be correcting anyone kek
>>523953234Pretty much. No political solutions. It's all going to just be a rage porn from here on out. Just more and more brazen with more and more gaslighting. If the people don't solve this the old-fashioned way, then it's deserved. Simple as that.
>>523950501Are you insane?
KEKAROO
