I wish I had a gf that sent me hand made letters like these they sent to Epsteint. 29 year old virgin
>>523961629B(C)JC is very powerful.
test
Male virginity is a myth. We don't have a hymen, nor do we run the risk of menopause.
>>523961629The Epstein shit is a distraction for Pizzagate. fucking 16 year olds isn’t bad. Fucking 8 year olds is.
>>523961629Well what the fuck. Dont you guys make women wear heavy black robes in oppressive heat and also mercy murder them? Just add learn caligraphy to the list of demands.
>>523961629Yeah, renowned philanthropist Jeffrey Epstein did nothing wrong and only ever supported hot, young teenagers in need. A saint, if you ask me.So holy, he was raptured live in prison. Naturally all his friends like Trump are also holy men. Helping all those teenagers in need on that island is basically the same as helping out in a food bank.Anyway, Israel needs a few more billions so make sure you're ready for some extra shifts on Monday. Happy holidays!
>>523963484Nigga he had a whole sacrificial island with an undisclosed underground complex that started from a weird temple, you think he was throwing birthday parties there?
>>523963484Tell me you are against trans kids without telling me you are against trans kids
>>523963484There wasn't even a basement kek
can I ...ummm.... raise a question here real quick?are we this firmly in clown world, that in due time it will become apparent,that each and every "girl" or "woman" involved in any of this was absolutely aware of what they're doing>AND>FUCKING>LIKED>IT!?
>>523963670>you think he was throwing birthday parties there?Eventually all the billionaires in their bunkers will start to do that...
>>523963401>1+1=4Menopause? Hymen? Geriatric sperm sure increases risk of autism and other neurological disorders, though, so we still hit a wall with our sperm.
>>523961629>fatherless child groomerI can bet none of these girls have a father
>>523963778You have to be over 18 to post here, faggot. Also, stop listening to bro podcasts.
>>523963484To fuck a 16 you have to groom for atleast 5 years. This is distraction from epstien with something which has no substantial proof
>>523963822>Geriatric sperm sure increases risk of autism and other neurological disorders, thoughI hear women gloat about this "factoid" a lot these days, but I've never seen any proper study that actually indicates that. Can you post whatever your source for this is?
"Thank you master"
>>523963670Surely God's chosen people would never do such things
>>523963778They made such cute diy presents telling about how good life epstein made for them afterwards>dear jeffrey>1/8-2002Yeah they liked it, but it's not ok because it's bad.It's bad.>>523964239it's called a - transaction
>>523961629because feminist femoids brainwashed the public that fucking 14yo is le bad, and people actually believed it without any prior history or science to back it up.>17 and before: NOOOOO she is a child!!!>18-20: she's taking gap year and finding herself>20-24: college aka dick carousel >24-30: slaving for mr shekel to fund her concerts and drink addiction, while being on the dick carousel too>30-35: casually looking for prince charming giga chad with 100s of checklists>35-40: panic and attacking men for not wanting a used good, std filled, probably with son tooresult? birthrates are non existence, import more pajeets to do work because no enough whites to do it. Marrying 14yo not just will increase it, but you will experience the real bonding like OP and get those letters.
>>523963401Menopause isn’t a thing
>>523963484Pizzagate was a distraction from Spirit Cooking
i want this un-redacted now
>>523963484Off to the gas chamber you go!
>>523963956Do you want me to baby you through a bachelor's degree also? https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5299396/>Although the epidemiological association between APA and autism/schizophrenia is now well established, the underlying mechanisms remain equivocal. APA effects have been attributed to both (i) inherited genetic factors in couples where an older male becomes a father or (ii) de novo genetic changes in paternal gametes that arise as a consequence of ageing.
>>523963484This is all a distraction from Hunter Bidens laptop.
>>523963727lol of course he is, we all are :)
>>523965144And how much is the increased risk? from 0-.01%?
>>523965411Why are you relying on 4channers for scientific information? Pull out Google Scholar, or your local academic database. /pol/ is an extremely biased place in the first place.
>>523965144Ok, I've now read your study and I've concluded that the evidence presented there does not really support the claims made at all.So this is obviously what I suspected it would be, just some jews who have paid for some pseudoscience with the purpose of discouraging white people to have children.They pay for a lot of such studies.
>>523965538Because I don't even need to look up the number to know it is minuscule. And not worth even bringing up.
>>523965651This is the greatest ragebait of all time, or you are a retard proving the lack of critical thinking epidemic spurred by the digital age.>>523965673Condoms have a 99% chance of effectivity, thus 1% chance at ineffectivity.
>>523965853>This is the greatest ragebait of all time, or you are a retard proving the lack of critical thinking epidemic spurred by the digital age.I don't think you've even read your own study that you use as a backing for your claim.First off, they do not categorically claim that this correlation even exist, they just consider it likely.>We postulate that inherited and de novo factors present complementary influences contributing to the epidemiological observations. Although these factors have been usually considered as competing hypotheses, the lack of unequivocal evidence to date suggests that likely both of them have a role.And if it does exist, which is still undetermined, they consider it inconsequential.>Considering solely the risk for neuropsychiatric disorders, current evidence does not suggest that men should be discouraged from having a child at an older age. Given the low prevalence of these disorders at baseline, even a fivefold increase in the odds ratio under an assumption of strong de novo effects, would yield a low probability that the conceived child will have autism or schizophrenia as a result of higher paternal age. From which you conclude that:>Geriatric sperm sure increases risk of autism and other neurological disorders, though, so we still hit a wall with our sperm.Which of course means that you're one of those people who have some sort of agenda, and you use vague opinion-pieces that have been shat through peer review that doesn't really say anything whatsoever as some sort of "scientific" justification for your convictions.Basically you're an intellectually dishonest moron.
>>523965853>Condoms have a 99% chance of effectivity, thus 1% chance at ineffectivity.and?
>>523966034I think little miss "men hit the wall toooooooo" didn't like how this thread developed.
>>523966309yes, hiding behind "studies" in the hopes no one looks at them. Your breakdown was enlightening, thanks for that. I just know the actual risk reduction is close to zero, while the relative risk reduction will be the number paraded about like it means something more than it is. Same shit with Covid.
>>523966567>Same shit with Covid.Yes. This is of course how governments, media and ngo's operate these days. They have some sort of idea they want to push, then they fund vague studies with ambiguous results, and then they present these findings as evidence for what they want people to think.So I can't be that hard on the tard normalfags that try to do the same. I mean, this is how they learn to think and act, with complete intellectual dishonesty. But the problem for normalfags who do it is that they don't have a trillion dollar media machine to propagandize their claim, so you can pick it apart in 2 seconds.
