I find that the Anglo-Saxon political style is the primary reason Britain finds itself in its current predicament.The English primarily solve problems by sowing division and plundering.What to do when the nation lacks funds?Raid wealthy nations.What to do when other nations' people resist?Sow division, plunging the masses into internal strife.India and Pakistan, Israel and Palestine—all stem from similar causes.This governing method has a fundamental flaw:it only works when the British are the aggressors.When the British could no longer invade other nations, the English nobility turned to exploiting their own people.This led to Britain failing to unify even its own islands—a nation of islands becoming a federation.Even tiny Wales sought independence.Today, to maintain their dominance, British politicians import large numbers of Muslims. They plunge the lower classes into internal strife solely to preserve their aristocratic status.It's only a matter of time before the UK erupts in large-scale independence movements and civil war.
Partly correct, partly propaganda.Which makes it GOOD propaganda.B+ at least.Your characterization of our "rulership style" is pitched to sound like the result of long study.But in truth, our historical monarchs had many "styles" of governance, and our political parties have shifted tactics many times.However, your assessment is true to the current paradigm; the British government has squandered the exclusivity of our institutes, and sold off all our manufacturing to you bugmen types.Frankly, a lot of their current behaviour is down to long-term manipulation of our political systems by wealthy foreigners, who more or less buy our politicians for pennies.The British industrialized most of the places they colonized; we built roads, hospitals and schools, and we built them so well that many are still in use today.We spread literacy, and quelled barbaric practices such as Suttee, ritual cannibalism, and caste systems.We expect no thanks; we did not do it for you.But additionally, any man with a mind for history will know that it is better to be conquered by an Englishman, than by a Mongol.Calling what will come "Civil War" is debateable.The native population will be on one side.The government and the imported client classes on the other.It would better be called a war against occupation.
>>523975160No. It's entirely propaganda. A+ for being typical asiatic nonsense.
>>523975160Scotland doesn't care or is affected by immigration, the national regional divide was the crux of OP's argument which you completely ignored to wank off about being English
>>523975160That's nonsense, Anglo-Saxons do not do industry, they loot and kill people to eat and have thralls do the work. The iron in English industry is from Celtic blood and that is now spent so the industry is not coming back.
