>Literally everything bad they said would happen if they lost, happened within a lifetime of their demiseHow did they know?
>>524052940White people have always been a minority. 90% of the world is non-White. An army of 80,000 British men ruled over 500 million Jeets. Among shitskin empires the ruling minority was always White. It’s not an issue at all.
I dont see black people are our main problem, thats the USs thing. Our problems are muslims.
>>524052940Probably the Vrilian sorcerers.
>>524052940You just have to extrapolate the points. People in the 1920s already knew what would happen, because this is the inevitability of liberalismMohler and de Benoist about Liberalism (I asked Grok, because I am lazy):Armin Mohler's Criticism of LiberalismArmin Mohler, a key figure in the Conservative Revolution and New Right, viewed liberalism as his main enemy. He portrayed liberals as cowardly, abstract thinkers incapable of decisive action (influenced by Carl Schmitt), promoting decadence, hedonism, and societal dissolution through fictitious concepts like the autonomous individual. He advocated instead for particular peoples, nations, combat spirit, and a tragic worldview.Alain de Benoist's Criticism of LiberalismAlain de Benoist, founder of the Nouvelle Droite, also declared liberalism the primary enemy. In works like Against Liberalism, he critiqued it as a total doctrine reducing society to a market, based on individualism, the homo oeconomicus, market idolatry, growth obsession, progress faith, and universal human rights. It destroys communities, true diversity, and collective identities while promoting globalization and commodification. No "good" liberalism exists; it overrides left-right divides and is incompatible with democracy or conservatism.CommonalitiesBoth New Right thinkers rejected liberalism as decadent, individualistic, and universalistic, dissolving authentic bonds (people, community). They saw it as the dominant modern ideology, to be overcome by particularistic or metapolitical alternatives. Mohler's critique was more personal and polemical; de Benoist's more systematic and anthropological-economic.
>>524052940>>524053075Damn that sucks, someone should’ve told shitler not do declare war on countries who could kick their fucking ass.
>>524053115>I dont see [subhuman shitskins] are our main problem, thats the USs thing. Our problems are [subhuman shitskins].It's the same problem. The lack of white solidarity and a willingness to fight for what is rightfully ours.
>>524052940Protocols of the elders of zion
>>524053285>"win" the war to lose your sovereignty to jewsDamn, guess Hitler was right..
>>524053075>>524052940kek it's so accurate
>>524053077This is true, it's interesting how little population size seems to matter in most cases. All those extra people aren't producing anything except food for their own survival.
>>524052940"French" Republic sent their lot of niggers in Germany during WW1. It didn't take a genius to understand what would hapoen on the future.
