>>524060503Nope. /thread
>>524060503Female has to do with biology, not anything not physical. Think in English where we don't have gender for non-human non-living things, that's why it's God's language.
I agree.
>>524060557>>524060656But what about Evola is saying here? He was a well known rational genius philosopher, and here he’s saying that a person can outwardly be the opposite sex that they are spiritually.
>>524060656why would a western language be a semite (((god)))'s language?
>>524060656>sical. Think in English where we don't have gender for non-human non-living things, that's why it's God's language.Hearing those strange voices again that no one else around you hears again?Better go get some thorazine treatments.
>>524060821>But what about Evola is saying here?That man can be feminine. He doesn't stop being a man, even if he's effeminate, nor can he become a woman.
>>524061735You’re transphobic. He explicitly writes that “manhood and womanhood are, above all, facts of an inner nature.”
>>524060821he is saying that a biological man can become a biological woman by mutilating his cock. In much the same way, a nigger can become White by taking meth until he turns pale (for evidence, see: Michael Jackson)
>>524060503define "to be"
>>524061959I'm just familiar with Evola. In Evolas view, you can be of male sex, but not be a man, or a woman. Just uninitiated evasive human, with no form.
>>524060503NoBut are you christian, athiest or Buddhist?
He is saying that just because someone is male he dosen't have to embody the higher spiritual nature of man. Think basedboys and trannies, they are male but not worthy of being called a man.
>>524062724You are a man because you have a penis. The metaphorical man maybe a social construct be we shouldn't really be basing our definition of man as a whole on something retarded like that. The defintion of masculine also varies by country. Not everyone's version of masculine is a hulking freak or a cowboy smoking cigarettes
yikes, xisters
>>524062724Its the embrace and integration of the divine masculine and feminine currents that is the most holy calling. To exclude one is to deny a third of creation. A feral child is closer to the divine than a priest the same as a truly embodying trans woman is closer to the divine than a gym bro.
>>524062950That may be true but Evola is much more concerned about the metaphysical nature of things than the material. He infact indentifies the obssesion with the material as one of the main problems with modernity.
yikes
>>524062950>dude indians think a man is someone who shits on the street and holds hands with his male friends!no I don't think anyone cares about what shitskins do. being a man is as much metaphysical, spiritual, and psychological thing as it is a biological one. instead of coping like this you should face your downbringings and become a real man
