Do you think most of the problem people have with pronouns is that in english their usage isn't just tied to cultural tradition but they carry a strict definitional gender? What if using opposite pronouns just meant that you were just tomboyish and cool and you aren't literally claiming to be a different gender from how you were born?
Yes if the situation was completely different people would probably interpret it differently
>>524103375I think it's a descriptive/prescriptive problem. When you have people who are, say, genderfluid, it becomes a fun little game of guessing how someone feels rather than using context clues that are immediately apparent to go "oh, this is a male and the convenience of gendered pronouns allows context to make the subject of my sentences clear," rather than a bunch of fucking homophones that are confusing as fuck, and frankly, the little extra work to read minds or to have to memorize a list of pronouns for each individual seems like the kind of demand that a narcissist would make, when I really want to know and care about a coworker's personal life as little as fucking possible. I don't want to know about someone's self-identification or how this Tuesday affected their self-identification because their pangender poly thruple isn't quite working out.It's insane to demand that. Male, female, genderless (which isn't grammatically intuitive). That's fucking it. You can have "they" because "xhe" is some shit you just made up because you're bored. Get a real hobby, you solipsistic fuck.
>>524103375kys
