[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


How come its easy for ugly skanks to go on a free fuck spree when they get cancer but men have to pay up to prostitutes?
>>
File: alsu_ersoz3223369.jpg (66 KB, 576x720)
66 KB
66 KB JPG
>>524119430
All I want for Christmas is to be released from the dungeon.
>>
>>524119430
i could have saved her bros
>>
>>524119430
>She subsequently spent a couple of years having a large number of sexual liaisons; she and Boyer once counted 188 sexual partners. She did not allow penetrative sex due to the effects of an early negative experience and due to the medication she was taking causing menopause, but did encounter a man who wanted to be kicked in the penis, a man with a foot fetish, a man who wanted to be urinated on, and a man who dressed up as a dog and wanted to live in a cage in her house. She bought stilettos for the first of these.
kek
>>
File: 1745205004749876.jpg (112 KB, 644x665)
112 KB
112 KB JPG
>>524119430
>>
>>524119957
>She did not allow penetrative sex
BBC only
>>
>>524119430
sex is gay
>>
I saw this on instagram and a ton of women were like good for her
>>
>>524120286
post your IG timmy
>>
>>524119430
because in relationships, it is the man who produces and the woman who consumes.
which means the man pays a shitload to get to stick his dick into her vagina.
that also means that most men will not pass on an opportunity to get some free pussy.
would you say "no" to someone offering you a free car, even if it's already 10 years old?
>>
>>524120368
Post your balls
>>
>>524119430
>guess i dont need that provider anymore
>>
>>524119430
>“She said [the dates] were helping her feel alive. She was reclaiming her body.”
This story is a great example of why women should have no rights and must be considered property.
>>
>>524119957
So it wasn't even sex she just had dominatrix feminist fetish
I'm sure some freaks were salivating at the prospect of this white queen crushing their testicles into mush (these freaks are also white lost of the time)
>>
>>524119430
Why do brown virgins post these awful threads?
>>
>>524119957
Why is the writer acting like foot fetish is some rare insane fetish
>>
>>524120657
>Why do brown virgins post these awful threads?
Don't know either.
Probably a lot of them are from India.
Pol needs to ip range ban india.
I have filtered all threads with woman or women keywords .
>>
>>524120467
This is what these retards refuse to understand. Sex is a female resource. It's something sold to men. Women don't have genitals, only men do. Women just have a cavity where male genitals are supposed to enter.
>>
If you plot the value of pussy on a chart it's at ATH.
It's an inflated bubble that needs to pop.
Bottom of the barrel obese single moms are fucking a new guy daily because they can, simply because they have a pussy and it's being valued too much (If it wasn't, they wouldn't be fucking so much).
>>
>>524120766
it could be changed by men getting their shit together as a collective and saying "no" to the current state of things, but that is unlikely to happen.
all men getting together and doing this as a collective would almost certainly lead to a better position for men in the long run.
but anyone who scabs has an immediate and very strong advantage, so you will not get that cohesion.
on top of that, inertia is also a very powerful dynamic when it comes to social topics. even if you can propose a solution that would be objectively better for 90% of people, its implementation (if it happens at all) will still proceed at a snail's pace because people resist change. regardless of the question if it's good or bad change.

>>524120576
it really is very tiresome to listen to women.
>uhhh, sex isn't necessary though?
>but at the same time, I need abortions because I can't be expected to keep my legs shut
>but some people simply do not deserve sex, and that's a good thing
>but also fucking my way through half a megapolis lets me reclaim ownership of my body after cancer took it from me
>and sex work is valid work, but anyone who frequents a prostitute should be put to death
>>
>>524120501
this
>>
File: file.png (721 KB, 640x651)
721 KB
721 KB PNG
>>524119430
>>
>>524120696
Feels bad to be in the same sentence as men who want to dress up as a dog and be pissed on huh
>>
>>524120968
kek
>>
>>524119430
What a whore
>>
>>524120867
>it could be changed by men getting their shit together as a collective and saying "no" to the current state of things, but that is unlikely to happen.
>all men getting together and doing this as a collective would almost certainly lead to a better position for men in the long run.
I've been saying this for years, the problems we have today are due to weak men who fail to hold women accountable. You don't need to beat them up or yell at them, simply refusing to be with women who misbehave is enough. This includes refusing to marry high body count women. If enough men demanded virgin brides, very few women will allow sex before marriage. I did my part by refusing to marry, even if I lost friends, was ridiculed and even threatened by a woman's upset brother..
>>
File: 1666368169641829.jpg (47 KB, 1200x675)
47 KB
47 KB JPG
>>524120968
>>
>>524119430
Why even leave your husband?
>>
>>524120867
Statistics show at least 50% of men are simps, i.e. sociopaths who view all other men as competition for women's approval. And the fact that 99% of women instinctively view men the same way the KKK viewed blacks, the absolute majority of democratic society will always be gynocentric. You can't get around this. There will castration laws, and laws to punish any non-Chad for experiecing lust. Democracy willl never work.
>>
>>524121108
yeah, pretty much.
women's position is just
>we should be allowed to do whatever we want with zero consequence
>men should not be allowed to do anything, and should pay out of the ass for the permission to do anything they enjoy at all
>we will still ensure they don't actually enjoy it btw, even after they paid
it's honestly amazing that men have gone along with this for so long, because what power do women even have to enforce this?
at most you'll hear some
>uhh, they can call the cops on you
but those cops will be men. women have ZERO actual power, anything they can do, they can only do because men willingly comply, without receiving anything in return.
it's fucked up.
>>
>>524120633
>>524120766
>>524121139
Most based Lebanese I've ever seen.
>>
>>524120867
Any plan that begins with "If we all just" can be immediately dismissed as fantasy. I don't even know why people entertain those hypotheticals anymore.
>>
>>524121298
that's how women operate on basically every men vs women topic.
they absolutely will push through their demands against 50% of the population.
it can be clearly evil shit like outright banning men from making paternity tests so women can make them pay for cuckspawn, and women don't give a shit, they will act as a block to get this.
>>
>>524121298
Yeah that's the problem, same reason why shitty governments exist. You can't stop all of the people if they revolt in one go. I mean it did happen in history, but on very rare occasions. Most men are cucks.
>>
>>524121395
>outright banning men from making paternity tests
That's the case in France and you'd think that with such laws in place most men would abstain from marriage, but no they still marry like the cucks they are.
>>
>>524119430
>no link
>it was real in my mind
>>
>>524119430
Because we live in a hellish loosh farm ruled by a demiurge and women are in league with that demiurge to produce more humans to torture for loosh.
>>
>>524121138
because they are status whores, and they love the thought of making someone miserable.
because if she cares little enough about you that she has no qualms about making you miserable, but you care enough about her that her actions actually can make you miserable, that means she socially stands above you, which strokes her ego.
sometimes you can see it spectacularly backfire, when they pull some shit that was intended to make their guy miserable, but the guy shows zero emotional reaction to it.
then they start to panic, because in their mind, if he cares that little, it means he is their social superior and has plenty of other options, and now they are scared shitless they might have driven away a guy they cannot easily replace.

women are retards who keep playing with fire up until the point they turn themselves into a torch.
>>
>>524121395
Women view each other as the ingroup and men as the out-group. Men always view women of the same race/religion/nation as the ingroup and they view the men of a different race/religion/nation as the outgroup.
An example is when a non-white man commits a crime against a white women, this will always enraged white men and make them demand vengeance. When a non-white woman commit a crime against a white man this will cause white women to justify her actions and pay her legal fees.
>>
>>524121497
yeah, my point was mostly that it isn't impossible to act that way. women do it frequently enough.
modern men are just too pathetic to do it, there are too many men who have already acknowledged women as their inherent superior and will thus never dare to disagree with them.
>>
>>524121510
Oh and male loosh is more potent and valuable because we are stronger than females. That’s why men suffer more in the realm.
>>
>>524119523
>>524119807
>>524120100
>>524120184
>>524120212

No source for thread. its a clickbait image, 1-post-by-this-ID thread poster. Dont bump this stuff; type sage in options if you reply
>>
>>524119430
Women don’t get sex, they give sex.
>>
>>524121524
She could've kept it on the dl then after 50 dudes he would've been like
>Damn it wife the whole town is talking how you're fucking everyone but me!
>I HAVE CANCER!
*dramatic pause*
>>
>>524119430
Because men will fuck anything with a hole. Now that I've gotten older, I've seen plenty of "straight" family men start fucking fags after their wives dry up. Id rather pay for some young slutty pussy at that point.
>>
>>524121733
nah. the ultimate misery for the guy isn't being cheated on behind his back. that's just betrayal and he can afterwards acts against that, and he will get some support for it from other people.
the ultimate misery is him being cucked to his face, and his wife making him acknowledge it. his spirit will be broken, and everyone will look at him in disgust for letting this happen.
>>
File: 1581355495646.png (320 KB, 1000x1000)
320 KB
320 KB PNG
>>524119430
You should know better than believe that jewish nonsense.
>>
>>524121670
What do you want me to say im just really baffled by women behavior.
>>
>>524121856
Its legit she was some radio host and died in 2019.
>>
>>524121856
COPE
O
P
E
>>
>>524121902
Women are liars like jews.
>>
>>524119430
How come it's so hard for men to say no to cancerous pussy?
>>
>>524119957
>She did not allow penetrative sex due to the effects of an early negative experience

What early negative experience? Was she raped by her uncle?
>>
>>524119430
Because unless you're a faggot nobody wants a smelly guy sticking his dick in you
>>
>>524119430
holy fuck lmao
>>
>>524121774
If they fuck guys they ain't "straight"
>>
>>524121832
Ok how bout this
>I will fuck you instead of those 200 dudes until you die, multiple times/day idc if my hair falls an I looks like an AIDS patient I'll still take the pill and keep fucking, you cock crazy cancerous whore
>>
>>524119430

she was just making sure she deserved the cancer



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.