Why do people say right wing is pro monarchy and hierarchy when leftists constantly suck off institutions and central banks?
>>524152476Right Wingers are also "pro Central Banks", you mong. The vast majority of right wingers are small business owners or otherwise average white collar middle class Joe who has a vested interest in the stability of the stock market, US dollar, and overall capitalist economy as it currently exists.
>>524152477lefty heroes like wilson and hamilton made central banks where as right wing heroes like Jackson killed them, you gay retard
>>524152476Right wingers do not have a serious ideology. They just exist to verbally oppose whatever the left is doing at any given time.
>>524152478>Hamilton>"lefty heroes"Statements like this are genuinely hilarious. None of you philistines ever worked a white collar job nor were any of you ever present in any upper class milieus of US society and it shows.Hamilton is the patron saint of every wannabe Gordon Gekko who works in finance in this country. I know your brain was still developing consciousness when that fucking musical first came out, so it's understandable that you cannot remember what the world was like pre-2016, but the elitist Hamilton has traditionally always been treated as the Quasi-Tory, borderline Monarchist, Conservative personality of the Founding Fathers
>>524152478>lefty heroes like wilsonHe's presently reviled and widely criticized for being a white supremacist who re-segregated the Washington bureaucracy and loved Birth of a Nation.
>>524152479the left only does bad shit
>>524152480>esl bong let me tell you about your country nonsenseno thanks, thirdy>>524152481they love that he created the fed, conscription and sidestepped the constitution with the national guard deployment bullshit
>>524152483I'm guessing you have no idea what pic related is, which explains your ignorance about pre-2016 culture and popular memory.
>>524152484>subhuman bongaboos who want to reestablish the aristocracy
>>524152485yeah that's the point, dude. Hamilton was always associated with the quasi-aristocracy we have/had in the US, the dreaded "WASPs". He was never a Left Wing figure, he was the figure that represented elitist New York millionaires (because for Boston Brahmins John Adams was obviously the preferred hometeam Patron) in country clubs where the Irish, Italians, Poles, Jews and other "proletariat riffraff" weren't allowed inside. Hamilton was the man of Astors, Rockefellers, Rensselaers, Vanderbilts, Morgans, etc.
>>524152486yeah, lefties
>>524152476genuinely you do not have the IQ to understand political philosophy and you should stay away from it
>>524152488you're a midwit homo who smells his own farts
>>524152476because people equate monarchy with tradition as opposed to progress
>>524152483the left still hates Wilson for the first red scare, he locked up our real heroes from that era
>>524152491>our
Institutions & central banks ARE the new monarchy. Leftists become the high priests of a secular theocracy. They worship the abstract System (Administrative State, central bank independence, NGO networks) the same way old monarchists bowed to the Divine Right of Kings. And they hate rival consecrations. Their egalitarianism is just the state religion of a managerial class that replaced bloodlines with credentials and heraldry with policy papers. The right now harbors the last true anti-monarchists who want to deconsecrate the cathedral entirely.
>>524152476The whole notion of politics as a 2 dimensional line is an absurd oversimplification. It's at the very least a 4 quadrant chart. This is why people have a hard time figuring out where the Nazis lay on a right-vs-left political line. The Nazis themselves were seen as a unity of established opposites at the time, embracing both traits of the far right and far left. The two crossed Sieg runes that make up the swastika are intended to represent a *unity* of nationalism and socialism, previously seen as political opposites.So everyone just puts the Nazis on the side of the political line that theyr'e *NOT* on.A four quadrant graph of politics makes more sense, but even that is also an absurd oversimplification.
>>524152480Why would someone have to work a white collar job to be a right winger?
>>524152493does this nigger not know that the executive branch ultimately has control over what these institutions do?
>>524152490this pic
>>524152495You don't have to, but for fairly obvious reasons the most economically successful members of society are often conservatives because the status quo worked out for them so they have no reason to shake it up or destroy it.
>>18249448left wingers are the ones sucking off the central bankers, the large banking institutions that are buying up property and the open borderers who are using foreigners to drive down wages and increase housing demand
The term goes back to the French revolution, where the meeting place for the French assembly was divided into two main camps. Those who sat on the right were pro-monarchists, and those who sat on the left were pro-Republican reform. At least originally this is how it was set up, until all the die-hard monarchists were purged and the entire assembly were essentially Republican reformers, which meant the old moderate left were now the right. The terms didn't have anything to do with economic policy at the time, because the issues plaguing nascent Republican government were much more existential, such as "should we allow a king to exist?" But our modern political landscape looks the way it does because the radical Republican faction won, and now every single mainstream politician in every single first world government is a liberal. By the standards of 18th century France, our "conservatives" would be among the most radical leftists, because each of them believes in an entirely democratic form of government which has no place for kings or aristocrats. That was the standard of the day.200+ years of uncontested liberal rule in places like the United States means that the political factions that emerged were simply different types of liberals concerned with different facets of society and with differing philosophies on how to govern. But they all agree that a democratic republic is obviously the best form of government, and you won't find any of them who want to change that.
>>524152479And thank god for that. Change for the sake of change is a mental disease, there has to be somebody demanding people think carefully about things first and applying the brake before society goes over a cliff.
>>524152477>Hamilton >left wingI know this was not used back in the day, but he was considered to be the most Conservative important politician in America at his time, while Jefferson was the libtard who hated God
>>524152480>Hamilton is the patron saint of every wannabe Gordon Gekko who works in finance in this country. I know your brain was still developing consciousness when that fucking musical first came out ... but the elitist Hamilton has traditionally always been treated as the Quasi-Tory, borderline Monarchist, Conservative personality of the Founding FathersHaha yeah the Democrats embracing Hamilton because of that stupid musical (because he's woke now) is HILARIOUS. And disturbing. I guess it does say something about a certain social class that rose up and came to monopolize key infrastructure on the liberal side under Clinton and Obama. I think the whole thing was Wall Street trying to psyop everybody as well of course. In fact during the 1930s, Hamilton was seen exactly as you describe and Jefferson was the guy that was favored by FDR's coalition. It was in the 1930s when the Jefferson Memorial was built too, incidentally.
>>524152476Which country are you from OP?
>>524152476Because you're an idiot
>>524152660>memeflagyou're skin it the color of shit, thirdy
>>524152609America
>>524152476During the French revolution the pro Monarchists sat on the right side of the legislature. The pro bourgeoise sat on the left side of the legislature.This is where the terms left and right wing came from. As you can see, the terms don't apply today.The left wing (bourgeoise) were the capitalists. People with immense power but had not hereditary rights to power /government. They were lawyers, bankers, merchants, academics, etc. While the monarchists were people who were gifted land and roles in government out of tradition. These were nobles, clergy, etc.So the French revolution was a capitalist revolution. And Marx would say we're due for a socialist revolution.
oh ok
