[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_3426.jpg (88 KB, 708x936)
88 KB
88 KB JPG
Why do a lot of people care more about dogs than fellow sapians, even family members?
>>
No clue I always found it bizarre
>>
>>524165790
It's a liberal vs conservative thing. Post the chart.
>>
>>524165790
because dogs are fluffy good boys who would never do anything wrong or harm anyone, except when they're tearing babies to shreds and shitting on your lawn of course
>>
Dogs didn't vote for it.
>>
>>524165790
I care about animals and my own people. I don't care for subhuman things like jeets and niggers.
>>
>>524165790
we ascribe free will to humans
>>
>>524165790
Leftists are misanthropes who see humans as expendable, interchangeable units.
>>
>>524165790
brown image and brown thread
>>
>>524165790
innocence hierarchy babies>pets>women>men>niggers
>>
>>524165790
dogs are mans best friend, and god spelled backward
anyone who thinks otherwise is a nigger or a chink
>>
>>524165852
Are you talking about the social allocation heat map? I read that study. The question wasn't "which do you care about more," it was asking about the extent of what you're conscious of or care about. The implication of the findings is conservatives don't care about or have empathy for anything or anyone outside their immediate circle, while liberals tend to have a broader limit, not that they value animals or the environment more than their families. This range of empathy and consciousness tracks with each group's preferred policies.
>>
>>524165790
Dogs are seen as more innocent and vulnerable than humans. Kind of like children. They are also known for unconditional loyalty, love, and affection.
>>
Id rather save the life of a single dog than 1 billion niggers
>>
>>524166312
> innocence

has nothing to do with innocence. it is about harm. dogs AND niggers should be put down when they hurt those which have done no harm. if anything, making it about “innocence” is the biggest psyop of all. niggers (males under 35) and dogs don’t really have agency, and that is why they are put down.

a child, cat, normal old person, etc, those things cannot do harm and are not temperamentally inclined to do harm, serious harm. so, the agency question need not be discussed.

non-nigger young men and women, most of them, can do harm, but mostly have agency, which means they can change and so death is not an appropriate punishment.
>>
>>524165852
Or urban vs rural, but yeah.

>>524087952
>>
Dog usually is defending the home from niggers

Sister is usually a coalburning whore who was fucking the nigger before things went south

Dog is morally superior to woman
>>
File: 1765312166292593s.jpg (3 KB, 125x107)
3 KB
3 KB JPG
>>524166655
This



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.