/pol/ - Why is /pol/ against automatization? - Politically Incorrect

Anonymous (ID: ENPQpiSf) Archived

12/23/25(Tue)10:24:50 No.524191579

File: i robot.png (358 KB, 664x353)

358 KB PNG

Anonymous (ID: ENPQpiSf) 12/23/25(Tue)10:24:50 No.524191579 Archived

Why is /pol/ against automatization?

Anonymous (ID: zt5tywvk)
12/23/25(Tue)10:27:10 No.524191713

Anonymous (ID: zt5tywvk) 12/23/25(Tue)10:27:10 No.524191713

>>524191579
I work in tech, automation is fine. Putting some jackass limits in charge of a process is like putting your dick in a wood chipper hoping nobody turns the thing on.

Anonymous (ID: QroUjyBJ)
12/23/25(Tue)10:27:40 No.524191741

Anonymous (ID: QroUjyBJ) 12/23/25(Tue)10:27:40 No.524191741

I'm not. AI will allow us to defeat the Archons.
We will succeed where the Atlanteans failed.
They won't destroy the Tower of Babel this time.

Anonymous (ID: zt5tywvk)
12/23/25(Tue)10:27:53 No.524191754

Anonymous (ID: zt5tywvk) 12/23/25(Tue)10:27:53 No.524191754

>>524191713
LLM not limit, fucking phone

Anonymous (ID: jUsIW2HJ)
12/23/25(Tue)10:28:30 No.524191787

Anonymous (ID: jUsIW2HJ) 12/23/25(Tue)10:28:30 No.524191787

I miss 90s-2000s Will Smith

Anonymous (ID: 786wSQMU)
12/23/25(Tue)10:29:52 No.524191860

Anonymous (ID: 786wSQMU) 12/23/25(Tue)10:29:52 No.524191860

I don't think automation is a problem, but I also don't think that if 90% of jobs are automated the handful of shareholders who become ultra-rich as a result should then just be permitted to become a rentier aristocracy

Anonymous (ID: t8QD9WVC)
12/23/25(Tue)10:30:07 No.524191879

Anonymous (ID: t8QD9WVC) 12/23/25(Tue)10:30:07 No.524191879

>>524191713
You don't know anything about technology faggot

Anonymous (ID: zt5tywvk)
12/23/25(Tue)10:34:52 No.524192124

Anonymous (ID: zt5tywvk) 12/23/25(Tue)10:34:52 No.524192124

>>524191879
Oh no I don't know shit about the field I've been working for twenty years. I must be faggot.