Is the female vote really consensus-based? https://x.com/Martin_Sellner/status/2003530206892704035
I ain't reading all of that
>>524211778You are mentally handicapped if it takes you more than a few seconds to to read
>>524211778/pol/ really is a shitskin board now
>>524211778Lomg story short: men have always been mostly conservative, right-wing (when it comed to voting) while women have voted anything past 100 years: farright, far left, conservative, liberal. Women don't use logic, they vibe vote. Rn it's not trendy or sexy to be pro-immigration so the woman are gradually vibe voting right wing (right wing is sexy now)
>>524211967>HEY EVERYONE LOOK WHAT SOMEONE RANDOM ON TWITTER SAIDwhy this stupid shit isn't a ban is beyond me.who the fuck is martin sellner?why do you care what martin sellner says?why do you think that means anyone but you cares about what martin sellner says?why'd you crop the date out?why'd you shit out the first retarded one-line question that shot through your "mind" like a steamy squirt of mental diarrhea, instead of offering some sort of critique or analysis?is it really that important to come here and shit out a question?>heh heh heh is he right, r/pol?????you should be raped to death.
its how women used to be the biggest supporters for monarchism and hated democracy
>sellner>on polhe finally made it
>>524211669>Is the female vote really consensus-based?No. It's actually because the left offers them rights, that you miss something so simple while posting a pseudointellectual twitter spiel is pathetic. The right will always move towards removing rights from women, they know this. It's not hard retard.
>>524213424rights without responsibilities always destroys society. women refuse to accept any responsibility for anything. you'd notice that if you were white
>>524212854>women do whats populardo you retards even life?Kill ALL JEWS
>>524213530>rights without responsibilities always destroys society. women refuse to accept any responsibility for anything. you'd notice that if you were whiteThis is a justification from men's point of view, not women's. It doesn't matter to women and never will.
>>524212764>who the fuck is martin sellner?EU budget version of Nick Fuentes of Austrian / German origin. He's been banned from crossing the German / Austria border for crimes of Volksverhetzung
>>524213017Does she have sex with literally anybody?
>>524211778Women follow male trends. That is the summery of it.
When actual war and violence comes, women will show themselves as the big fat hens they really are. They will flee en masse and beg for mercy. Women are natural cowards. The reason they treat us like trash is because the state has made it illegal for us to do what man has always done when woman gets bitchy, ie tell her to shut the fuck up, smack her, or whatever. Every aspect of our society is tightly controlled by this state of corporations, lawyers, policemen, schools, etc. One word out of line and some jackass 500 miles away decides to persecute you. Hence, women behave as they please, since men are under tyranny. But when this system collapses under its own weight, it will become more like Brazil or Detroit, where women fear the gangsters and criminals more than they do the police.
>>524213651That's why we don't give women responsibilities, they don't even understand what the word means, they only know "gimme gimme gimme" and "I deserve"They don't know where things come from, they don't care about where things come from. You have stuff, they have a pussy, she trades her pussy for the stuff you have and everything is happy :)Except we now give women stuff for free, she doesn't have to trade pussy for anything, she can just get stuff for existing, so she doesn't give pussy to anyone and doesn't have children and doesn't vote for people who earn stuff and doesn't respect anyone with responsibilities, it's all meaningless to her. Civilization is utterly meaningless to her. The guy who keeps the electricity on? Ick. The dudes making sure your toilet doesn't backflow into your house? Ew. All the things in her life exist and she's not even aware that it does anything. It's just there, it just happens. She takes for granted everything because she's not largely incapable of forward thinking and isn't sentient.They are truly the niggers of gender and must be controlled by men or they adopt self-destructive and antisocial behaviours that genuinely destroy society, and they do it in the way that a monkey sees a banana and eats a banana. Not with malice, but with a total lack of forethought and sentience. Simply an input/output NPC.
>>524213424Yeah this is the rub where a lot of rights wing minded people absolutely ruin themselves and their chances at getting societal power.Like yeah even if you disagree with it let's be real woman are realistically going to be able to keep voting so maybe try convincing them instead of threatening to second class them?It also doesn't help the main people ive seen with that opinion have frankly been the lower class/isolated right wing men who yeah actual family units are just going to laugh at when they angrily suggest their wives shouldn't vote lol.Like if you are a poverty stricken loser who is honestly going to take you seriously?The topic is a non starter because unfortunately those types of people are the most vocal supporters of it so a lot of woman and frankly men see it as spiteful incel seethe.
>>524215094Women are going to become second class no matter what, it's just which men are in charge when it happensIf we do not put women in their place, as you posit is the correct action: Then our society implodes and whites are largely genocided by the imported foreigners. It is by necessity that "female rights" must be stripped. They are not even rights. It's like pretending women can have dicks and get other women pregnant. Actual female rights related to children and taking care of the home. Having a job isn't good for women, participating in politics isn't good for women (and they influence politics through their husband ANYWAY). Our jewish society tricks you into thinking women "lack" rights if they don't do all the same things as men, but these things men have are things only men can handle. If you let women play pretend you might as well be letting children run your society. With the same inevitable, suicidal, results.And at the end of the day, your society collapses and men step in and put the women in their place.Our choice is to either do it first, or be exterminated and have 3rd world conquerors put our women in their place. There is no future where women keep having "rights" - because women with rights is a self-limiting and self-destructing society. It can only end back where it starts, just with a lot of death and suffering in the interim.
>>524215417>Our choice is to either do it first, or be exterminated and have 3rd world conquerors put our women in their place. There is no future where women keep having "rights" - because women with rights is a self-limiting and self-destructing society. It can only end back where it starts, just with a lot of death and suffering in the interim.Good breakdowns from you both that actually understand the problem at hand. It's not as simple as "should women have rights" in a perfect world they'd be worthy of them. We do not live in a perfect world.
>>524213424Which rights do men have that females don't?
