Lefties like to say "race" is just a social construct.It's true.The "races" are actually different species.Animals don't have "races" because "races" are a social construct, and the different human "races" are more genetically distant to each other than different species of animals are.
Thank you white American man for teaching me this, im in eternal gratitude.
>>524261612different species cant produce viable offspring
>>524262296This isn't true.There are MANY different species that can produce viable offspring with another species:Coyotes and Wolves: They produce "Coywolves." These are common in the wild (especially in Eastern North America) and are fully fertile.Grizzly Bears and Polar Bears: They produce "Grolar Bears" or "Pizzly Bears." Due to climate change, these species now meet more often in the wild and produce fertile offspring.Domestic Cattle and American Bison: They produce "Beefalo." These were intentionally bred for meat and are fertile.Domestic Cats and Servals: They produce "Savannah Cats." While early-generation males are often sterile, females are usually fertile and used to continue the breed.Lions and Tigers: They produce "Ligers" (male lion/female tiger) or "Tigons" (male tiger/female lion). While males are typically sterile, female ligers and tigons are often fertile and can breed with lions or tigers.I suggest using AI for a bigger list.
>>524262368Viable means that the offspring can also reproduce.Humans are kind of in a weird category unto themselves, no one denys population level genetic differences, but the problem is that terming it "race" or "species" just isn't exactly scientifically accurate.That being said, we need better descriptors for human genetic populations that aren't objected to by either scientists or racists.
>>524263952Did you read? The ones I posted were fertile, and those are just the commonly studied ones. There are tons.
>>524263952>scientists or raciststhey are not distinctly different, as in you can have racist scientist and you can have non racist laymen but this is semantics to your point
Species is a very cold word.I can be even colder.Formation.
>>524264117I think every intelligent scientist acknowledges the great differences between the races/species.
>>524264117I point it out because language is a form of power and word association like that can manipulate chain of logic without conscious effort, im sure its unintentional but it feels dirty when I see things like that, and I see it in practically every thread, subtle forms of propaganda, maybe its just people who have been soaking in it and they all exhibit it in how they communicate, linguistic patterns theyve absorbed and then reflect without knowing
>>524264160Cold to the inferior races/species yes because they want to feel like they're on the same level as their superiors.>oh derr we're not species we're races? dat meens I'm a human too!?!1 Wow I'm speshual.
>>524264292My point is that calling them races instead of species is a subtle form of liberal propaganda.
>>524261612What I like about this point is not that we definitely should classify races as species, but to highlight how different we actually are.If we categorize humans as one thing then genetic changes sound irrelevant, but if you show how different we are, a path for thought patterns that explains our differences through genetics gets way easier to form in the general population.
>>524264345Wouldnt it be sub-species instead of species. We are all still Homo Sapiens, but there are different sub species of Homo S.
>>524265004Are we really all homo sapiens or is that a somewhat arbitrary classification?Perhaps it's more accurately:Homo whiteHomo negroid
>>524264011He ignored it because he's not arguing in good faith.
>>524261612speciation is ducks to chickens, your thinking of polymorphism, when a species has alot of different varities. for instance, mallard ducks, call ducks, cayuga etc.Their all still ducks. this is how humans work.
>>524263952Not to mention mixed race people especially black/white people are not viable and mixing causes all kinds of medical problems on a genetic level.
>>524265207and when i say speciation, i am referring to phylogenetic, which is the agreed upon method to viewing speciation.
>>524265207Read the OP pic. Read this post>>524262368The different human species/races are literally so different. Niggers are so ugly and dumb it's unreal. They're nothing like whites at all.
>>524265111you literally already have terms.caucusafricanusyou just dont know them.
>>524265480you dont like how science works and thats fine.quit talking about it then.Go talk about dragons and religion.You have more dna in common with a local nigger than a distant white.
>>524265111It would be Homo Sapiens Europensis or Homo Sapiens Caucasinus. I dont im just making shit up, but something like that, there is an entire rulebook to taxonomic naming.
>>524265617>more dna in common with local niggerSorry buddy this is not how it works.You're trollingBut yes there are different species:Homo CaucasusHomo NegrosusHomo JeetusHomo Spicus
>>524265712you dont know what your talking about and the most i can do for you is google it since you havnt read and if i recommend it, you wont.
>>524265712knowledge takes work and you dont want to do the work, you just want to know things.You operate on vibes and don't care about the truth.Just the way it is. Please focus on religion.I hate you so much....
>>524265533This aren't these terms used in forsensic anthropology.They can usually tell with a fairly high degree of accuracy what race some bones belong to just from common bone volume, ratios..etcThis is why there is such a big push to subvert this scientific field with "cheddar man" and other such bullshit.
>>524265851>>524265928IDK what liberal propaganda AI you're using but that's complete bullshit and goes against evidence and common sense.Here's the real AI.
>>524266065....bone structure and dna arnt the same thing....why are you comparing this?of course you can tell the race and gender of someone based on their skeleton (with a high percentage)I dont understand what point your trying to make.You and your nigger neighbor have more dna in common than you and a european.
>>524261612Where did Albanians come from
>>524266189Bone structure is DNA, yes.You can tell whether the person has black or white DNA by their bone structure, and their brain structure.
>>524266183https://www.vanderbilt.edu/evolution/wp-content/uploads/sites/295/2022/04/lewontin1972.pdfhereThere was a study done in 1972 and it was reinforced again in the early 2000s.
>>524266302Listen we share 99% of DNA with bananas or pigs or something like that.These liberal AIs are capitalizing on that.The truth is the genes that are different make all the difference, and those genes are different between races and those differences are the same no matter how far or close you live to your DNA relatives.
>>524266292when you look at a bone, you are not examineing dna, but the results of dna.Your confusing what DNA made, for being DNA. DNA is the instructions for the bone structure, bones are not DNA
>>524266427We know this.It doesn't change what I said.
>>524266394which is why the 0.1% is all that really matters.Guess where your idea of race exists in the 99.9% vs the 0.1%?ill give you a hint.if you don't have a banana for being yellow, your a hypocrite.
>>524266499Yes kid you're just repeating what I said.The differences are small but they make a world of difference.
>>524266292can you tell me by bone structure the if a mixed race person is white or black?You understand this bone structure examination is very niche and why its rarely used, especially if you have any type of biological material.
>>524266585If you're mixed with black you're black.We always call mixed race people by the inferior race in their mixture.So if you're a mix of white and another race we always call you by the other race.
>>524262296> different species cant produce viable offspringMythMany different species produce fully fertile offspring when cross-bredMany more produce (half fertile) offspring where either the males or females are viable and can reproduce with either of their two crossed species.Open a book, turkroach
>>524266552you completely disproved https://www.vanderbilt.edu/evolution/wp-content/uploads/sites/295/2022/04/lewontin1972.pdfthe rosenberg studyand the 2002 paper genetic structure of human populationsMy god, had i know someone in 4chan would of invalidated my lifes work, i would of not wasted so much time.
>>524266703I'm not reading that idiotic shit.Just use common sense and look at this AI.>>524266183Ask an AI the question I asked, preferably a smarter less liberal one like Grok.grok.com
>>524266649You again are confusing your feelings with facts.how far back does the black DNA go and is still traceable in the bone structure?
>>524266794I guess it depends on if you inherited the black bone structure DNA or not.But if you did then you can detect it.Blacks have longer arms and legs, shorter torsos, smaller heads and brains. Oh and ugly faces.
>>524262296>different species cant produce viable offspringHow do you exist then?
>>524266792no shit you arnt, its why i used AI in the first place you retard.asking one of you inbred losers to read for 5 minutes is too much, you just want to talk about shit you dont know shit about 24/7everything you think and feel is vibes. You are like animal, your very existance is a miracle and society will eventually filter you, probably through lack of reproduction.
Are all different dog breeds different species? Are all different plant cultivars different species? >no
>>524266883Read this AI, it's right.>>524266183You're a complete piece of shit troll.
>>524262368ok interesting that you responded with a serious and correct answer. This actually prompted me to look this stuff up and apparently there are terms like "Syngameon" (distinct species that can interbreed but retain ecological differencese), "species complex" (species with blurry boundaries), "Evolutionary Significant Unit" (for endagered species lists: "i don't care if it's technically a species, we have to preserve it") and "metapopulation lineage" (in the grand scheme of things, despite occasional hybridization, coyotes and wolves go different evolutionary paths). interesting.according to a minority view, humans would be classified as a "polytypic species with several subspecies". the more pertinent question seems to be: what political narrative is being fueled. because the biology is kind of blurry. so i guess niggers aren't human, after all.
>>524266853so what your telling me, is you cant determine if someone is black or white exclusively based on the skeletal structure?How far back can you trade black DNA inside of a skeleton? if my grandmother was black would my skeleton be black? what if it was 200 years ago and we bred white exclusively till then?You cant answer, because what you said isnt real. its vibe based science. your mixing several fields and studies together along with making shit up and filtering it through ideology.You have bad information and your mad people wont internalize it with you.SO I AGAIN ASKHow long before you cant see the black dna inside the skeletal structure?2 generations?10?1000?
>>524266863tough question. Can't answer. Probably genetic engineering by anunnaki.
>>524267021I can't answer that because I haven't fucking did a scientific study on it you fucking negroid.Stop denying your common sense you fucking subhuman.What you call vibes is just common sense.
>>524261612Australians are 2x the genetic distance from Nilo-Saharans that the English are (.36 vs .18). Are Australians twice as White as the British? South Chinese are have far greater distance from Saharan people than the Danish do (.30 vs .17) OP, this measure is simply gauging which populations intermingled more at some point before this research was done (80s & 90s). UK and Denmark obviously had far greater engagement with Africa (colonization) than other places, so you end up finding more English & Danish genes floating around in Africa.
>>524266906its cropped, with no sources. god only knows what rules you programmed into your AI.Provide a source for the AIs information. i provided 3. i only used AI to reference things i already know and cant remember the name of.sources here>>524266703
>>524267106White doesn't mean who is more different than niggers you idiot. It's a specific group of DNA.
>>524262368buddy you just described a bunch of animals that are actually the same fucking species because TAXONOMY IS NOT ACCURATE. TAXONOMY IS NOT A SCIENCE, IS A ROUGH SYSTEM, NOT A PRECISE ONE.THOSE ARE THE SAME SPECIES>>524265261>mixed race people are not viable and can't have childrenyou're actually retarded.
>>524267140Dude you're a low IQ subhuman.
>>524267100being angry is a feeling too.Is your entire life like this?vibes?
>>524267159>MY DEFINITION IS RIGHT USE MY DEFINITION
>>524267182"vibes" You're a nigger guaranteed.
>>524262296This would make evolution imposible
>>524267179see>>524267182if you dont like real science, quit trying to fuck it.you can make up all the fairy tale bullshit you want with spirituality.
>>524267314Grok was right, yours was wrong.You deny science.
>>524267240do you always devolve into a shit throwing monkey the second your backed into a intellectual corner or is this a new emotional response?I literally disproved your feelings by asking questions. You need to be able to answer the questions people have if you think you have the answers.
Question:If you're white, do you share more DNA with a black person who lives near you than a white person who lives in another country?Answer:No, if you're white (of European ancestry), you typically share slightly more DNA with a random white person from another country than with a random black person (of sub-Saharan African ancestry) who lives near you.Human genetic variation is mostly within populations rather than between them—about 85–95% of differences occur between individuals within the same group, with only a small portion (roughly 5–15%) distinguishing major geographic or ancestral groups. This means any two random people are overwhelmingly similar (sharing ~99.9% of their DNA).However, genetic similarity follows geography and ancestry more than immediate proximity:People of the same continental ancestry (e.g., Europeans) share slightly more genetic variants on average due to shared historical migrations and population bottlenecks outside Africa.In contrast, sub-Saharan African populations have greater internal diversity than all non-African populations combined, because modern humans originated in Africa and carry more ancient genetic variation.So, a white person in, say, the U.S. is genetically closer to a white person in Europe than to a black person in the U.S. or Africa, even if the latter is a neighbor. This is because racial categories (like "white" or "black") loosely align with continental ancestry patterns, and geography still drives most variation (isolation by distance).The idea that a neighbor of different race would be genetically closer is a common misconception. While it's possible in rare cases (e.g., due to recent admixture or outliers), on average, ancestry trumps local proximity for overall genetic similarity.For context, studies show that with enough genetic markers, individuals can often be clustered by continental ancestry, but the differences are small, and variation is clinal (gradual across geography) rather than discrete.
>>524267388You didn't do shit.You're a bad actor.
>>524267352sources>>524266703your welcome to disprove them. until then you cant cry me into being stupid with you.
>>524267463No I just want to end your stupid life and anyone like you.
>>524267440you know everyone can reread all this right? its a open forum and they can see my posts.Crying about reality not adjusting to your feelings isnt going to make me change my research.But your free to disprove it all if you want.
>>524267539Yes anyone can read it and see that you're a troll.
>>524267504you cant. this is another emotional response your having. A tremendous one. These feelings of violence and rage your having for a random person on the internet because you didnt like the polite information provided is a sign that you are not societal cohesive and should be removed, most likely.Basically, you are the problem. A nigger.
Whites are like golden retrieversBlacks are like putbullsSame race but different due to selective breeding.Op is prolly colored so he can never understand it
>>524267625Does that matter if I can't find you?You're changing my future actions against people like you when I meet them in person.
>>524267577i been nothing but civil and only responded with harsh words when i was given harsh words.what goes around comes around.You have been disingeous the entire time pulling facts out of emotion and citing nothing you had to say. Its all feelings and vibes and the second i ask for a ai source its grok, and it wasnt even in reference to something you understand, you were literally asking the ai to teach you something instead of pulling information.You used the tool wrong and became stupider for it and now your mad at me....All good. Have a good day man and i hope your life improves. Merry christmas.
Humans and chimps have about 35 million base pair differences. The most distant humans (San/Khoisan) have only at most about 4.5 million base pair differences. genes of interest are:skin lightening: SLC24A5 and SLC45A2melanin: MC1Rasian facial and bone structure: EDARflat african nose: PAX3, PRDM16, and DCHS2tibetan/denisovan low oxygen, high altitude athleticism: EPAS1nigger fast-twitch muscle fibers for sprinting: ACTN3intelligence: highly polygenicinteresting stuff.
>>524267776I don't care about your harsh words.What I can't stand for is denying reality and intentionally obfuscating facts to fit your liberal agenda.
>>524267681im an Appalachian, im rather large, and i work physical labor most of the dayIf you could find me, i dont think it would matter. I have dogs.i have guns.I know the landi'm largeI have a family.I just dont think you are a real threat, i am more concerned over racoons and if you decided to assault someone based on the interactions with me, that is telling of you as a person, not me.It would be the same as if you lost a fight to someone larger, went home and then beat up your 9 yr old brother because you couldn't win in the other fight. It's sad and it shows a extreme lack of empathy and emotional maturity.
>>524267855you dont care about the facts or truth either.I thought i been very clear, you EXCLUSIVELY care about vibes and feelings, yours specifically.
>>524267948Obviously I can't find you.But don't think you're tough, anyone can just come up behind you and poof you're dead.
>>524267855im not a liberal, this is the most insulting thing anyone has said this entire thread lol.I hate liberals.
>>524268082Hilarious.
>>524268023then why did you say it?Why make the threat?I have a theory.It was a emotional response because you cant handle processing information that doesnt align with your world view and feelings.I'm going to be using the word feelings a lot, so buckle up.
Populations who were the most successful, dominant, and militarily proficient are, ironically, going to have a shorter genetic distance to brown people, because those populations are the ones who colonized everything and had lots of contact with brown people, so you're going to find traces of their genes amongst brown people.
>>524268155I didn't threaten you you stupid fuck I said I WANTED to not that I was going to.
>This is a complex area of research where modern technology (like AI) and biological anthropology often seem to give different answers.loool this made me kek
>>524268107i didnt find it funny. The only thing worse than a liberal is a conservative.But end of day, their all child fuckers and all their people are vile.Israeli culture through a western lens and i hate it.
>>524268274You're a moron. Just stfu and leave this is boring.
>>524268206why do you want to harm me?to what benefit?to what end?Why did you say you wanted to harm me. i dont want to harm you. I would if you tried to hurt me or my family, but i dont actively want to harm you. If anything, id want to force educate you or put your ass to work in a mine.My cellphone needs more coltan.
