[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
Flag
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: ybc_survey.jpg (82 KB, 1168x1045)
82 KB
82 KB JPG
In 2025 Pew Research Center found that 66% of young men are single while the majority of young women were in a relationship. The survey was posted here yet the shills maintained that single doesn't mean incel and that the majority of young men are having sex without an issue.

>Sources: https://treyhamilton.substack.com/p/most-young-men-are-single-in-2025

>https://www.pewresearch.org/about/

So, a YouTuber tried to shed some light in the situation and threw a survey by himself, with 20k responders.

56% of those who answered reported that they had ZERO sex in the past year. That's more than half of the young men..

What the fuck is going on exactly? How is civilization going to maintain itself when young men are getting nothing in return for their labor? Why is no politician talking about this? This is the most important issue in the West right now
>>
>>524262703
56% you say?
>>
>>524262703
>Terminally online zoom zooms aren't getting any pussy
Y'all needed a fucking survey for that?
>>
File: 1758908115413296.png (1.66 MB, 1520x4721)
1.66 MB
1.66 MB PNG
>>524262703
>>524262742
>>524262806
WARNING, YOU ARE POSTING IN IDRAMA LAB THREAD!!!!
WARNING, YOU ARE POSTING IN IDRAMA LAB THREAD!!!!
WARNING, YOU ARE POSTING IN IDRAMA LAB THREAD!!!!
WARNING, YOU ARE POSTING IN IDRAMA LAB THREAD!!!!
WARNING, YOU ARE POSTING IN IDRAMA LAB THREAD!!!!

>https://idrama.science/publications/
iDrama, a group of academic faggots who are "fighting hate" and "researching radicalization" or some such shit by posting threads on /pol/ about women,society,relationships,video games,(Or any shitty ragebait,time wasting question,demoralization thread and larp), then they get reactions from those threads and publish those reactions for ''research''. You can notice some of them are from Greece and Cyprus https://archive.is/DFdqk

SOME SHILL THREADS THEY MAKE, NOTICE HOW ITS ALWAYS LARP,TIME WASTING QUESTION,RAGEBAIT,OR SOME SHITTY DEMORALIZATION
ALWAYS GREEK FLAG, AND ALWAYS 1PBTID
>https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/subject/gf/country/GR/type/op/
>https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/subject/games/country/GR/type/op/
>https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/subject/women/country/GR/
>https://archive.4plebs.org/_/search/text/%22be%20me%22/country/GR/type/op/
their youtube channel:
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtqE6ztLK6U (Listen to the Greek accent, this is probably the fag behind the 1PBTID threads)
github about ''manosphere analysis'' AKA posting shitty threads on /pol/
>https://github.com/idramalab/manosphere_analysis
>>
>>524262703
>intimate
vague term. This does not necessarily mean sexual intercourse
>>
>>524262703
So some 50% of Zoomers are too poor to afford a prostitute?
>>
>>524262856
Why don’t some Europeans kill them?
If they were close enough to me I would throw a few grenades into their office, then hack up any survivors with an axe.
>>
>>524262703
how many had sex with other men instead and voted no since it's about women
>>
>>524262703
One... Just broke a 2 year dry spell and might make her my gf
>>
>>524262944
I went to a prostitute once. It was meh. How anyone in human history could cum when they're fucking a condom on is crazy to me, you might as well just thrust into the air.
>>
>>524262703
We have this thread every day.

I'll tell you once more:

The game is over. The hominids of the planet have subconsciously agreed upon depopulating the planet by nuking the population pyramid base.

The elites have won, the world has been unanimously deemed too horrible to raise children in.
>>
>>524262944
your sisters cheap
>>
>>524262703
Why are you so desperate to keep making those threads? Literally no one cares move on shill
>>
>>524263197
Dick desensitization from being a gooner + condom = feeling absolutely nothing. You can't even tell if it's in. Stop watching porn and jerking off. I'm telling myself this too
>>
File: 1746759906413930.png (326 KB, 670x754)
326 KB
326 KB PNG
>>524262856
https://archive.is/eLecT
Look into Clipping next.
>>
>>524263197
Not having a mutilated dick helps
>>
File: game over.jpg (216 KB, 1384x540)
216 KB
216 KB JPG
>>524262703
The game is over, as I am fond of saying.

The women won. They are in control of the eugenics program and the multi-trillion-dollar pussy reward system — a highly symbolic fertility ritual. But they are in control of much more than the reproductive apparatus. They control not only the men and government of the United States of America but through the power of pussy and the susceptibility of men and government officials, fiat currency manipulation by the Witches of Fiat Currency at the Federal Reserve System, a large army of simps and "backers" (this is a technically incorrect use of the term) who are fighting to maintain control of the Frankenstein monster they created called Onlyfans (in a war I fear we are going to lose), and even the Republican form of government they created which inevitably—and I would argue by design—fosters centralized female matrilineal control and assures only a handful of "pre-selected" men must be sacralized to control an entire country, they control the entire world.
>>
>>524263225
Oooof
>>
OP posts this same homosexual incel demoralization lie every day.
>>
>>524262703
Why does this jump from 0 to 1-3? The question should be rephrased
>0 (I'm an Incel)
>1 (I'm married)
>2+ (I'm a slut)
>>
>>524263344
Cut dick + Porn Addiction + 5% of chads fucking 90% of the women + demoralization + sterilization thru drugs/ food/ and contraception= the Population Control (((they))) want
>>
>>524262703
Its overrated
It always was but now everyone realizes how completely overrated sex and dating trully is
Men want woman to bear their kids, nothing else, everything else is peacock dance around the fact.
Women dont know what they want but monkey see monkey do and they are false consensus tricked into thinking that will miss something out if they dont do runaround on carousel.

My wife, 15 year younger than me and mother of 3 of our children had a grandmother that told her when she was teen or so and started looking like a pretty girl
>you can be with with many men publicly without even having sex with them and people will never forget that you are a slut
>or you can be degenerated whore for your husband and people will ever know

Pick your poison women
>>
>>524262703
>How is civilization going to maintain itself
It's not.
That's what women can never grasp. There is no victory condition for them where they establish the matriarchy and then rule over the nation happily ever after, because once they establish their matriarchy, the nation simply dies since men will refuse to work or die for something they have no stake in.
>>
File: 1742260801315655.jpg (16 KB, 295x300)
16 KB
16 KB JPG
>>524262703
>44% are sex having with more than one woman
>8% are rotating a bunch of women like rng
I know /pol/ likes to shit on women, but it takes two to tango and there's an epidemic of womanizers that would've been executed or hung from a tree a century ago for ruining women.
>>
>>524263364
It's not eugenics, it's dysgenics. Eugenics would involve incentivizing the most intelligent and creative people to breed, not the government giving tax-payer money to single mothers to shit out more criminals and halfwits.
>>
>>524262856
Shut up. The incel epidemic is real, and you're a shill for downplaying it.
>>
>>524262703
>>524262742
>56% of young men reported zero sexual activity in the past year
on twitter, and only 20,000 votes out of the 200,000,000 males in the country. weird. almost like you are a lying kike
>>
i've had like a dozen guys in the last year so not sure what the problem is
>>524263197
okay but i don't need an std and it feels the same for me
>>
File: uncletedcabin.jpg (12 KB, 275x183)
12 KB
12 KB JPG
>>524262703
Instead of committing to who they must, women are chasing commitment from men they wish would commit to them, and they're chasing the same small percentage of men that are attractive at a second's glance, that they "swipe right" on, using a single's app.
The logical conclusion is a large population of childless, unmarried, women, incapable of changing their circumstance (roastie epidemic). Many men, like myself, believe the only point of marriage is to have a family. If the old hag aged out of reproduction, what's even the point? She's nothing but a liability.
The average Millennial is 37-38 years old. In five years tops, the roastie epidemic will be undeniable.
10 years tops, Prostitution is legalized.
I can even see a future in which women live in highly secured commie blocks, working remotely, getting things delivered to them because they'll be afraid to leave the building.
Best move for men: Leave the cities ASAP. Don't wait like you did with Silver, get out NOW. BUG OUT, while you still can. Live in your car, a tent, an Uncle Ted cabin, just purchase that piece of land and high-tail it. The cities will only get worse. They will not get better in our lifetime.
>>
>>524263912
Ok, anon, find something proving it wrong. There are surely some studies saying that the pussy and dick distribution is even across the field, right? Since its such an obvious lie despite this shit being reported by PEW years ago.
>>
File: 1424676399899.jpg (30 KB, 600x600)
30 KB
30 KB JPG
>>524262703
I don't care
>>
>>524262703
>found that 66% of young men are single while the majority of young women were in a relationship
How does that work
>>
>>524262703
>20k responders
Wamp wamp
>>
>>524264396
just keep changing the number every time and it will never matter
>>
>56% of your men
It's more like 80% actually. Men increase their body count, women decrease.
>>
>>524264095
>Ok, anon, find something proving it wrong.
oh no i dont have to do that. i dont believe your study at all since it doesnt prove itself. ez pz
>>
>>524264396
It turns out the 'sexual revolution' was entirely about women just wanting to be a part of a harem for Chads. Seriously.
>>
File: 1752900440332105.png (214 KB, 734x1075)
214 KB
214 KB PNG
>>524263470
the fall of rome came after women's rights
>>
>>524264512
Yeah but how many chicks can pull it off
Chads not rotating 6 and 7s when he can play 8–9s
>>
>>524262703
>while the majority of young women were in a relationship.
No it just means the majority of young women are getting banged by that 8% and classify that as being in a relationship.
>>
>>524264705
Situationship
>>
File: IMG_1675.png (693 KB, 714x900)
693 KB
693 KB PNG
>>524263545
Female selection is Fisherian Runaway, a directly opposite force of natural selection or eugenics. It’s arguably dysgenic, of the dysgenic forces
>>
>>524263364
Fuckboy Extermination Squadrons when?
>>
>>524264522
women just make shit leaders, so it is inevitable.
in a patriarchic household, it on average works out in everyone's favor because the patriarch will be the most experienced and thus capable of guiding people. it might appear that he's only sitting on his ass and giving orders, but those orders are backed up by experience and lead to an outcome that's better than just the sum of the individual contributions, so everyone wins.
in a matriarchic household, the matriarch just uses her power to terrorize everyone 24/7 to remind them of who is in charge. anything actually getting done is irrelevant because it's only about power consolidation for the sake of power, not about actually doing anything useful with it.
>>
>>524264821
people who claim that women are an agent of evolution do not understand how evolution works anyway.
it's not a hard cut on the population were certain traits are eliminated within a single generation. there is not even any clear answer to which traits are desirable and which aren't most of the time.
it's just a slow process where deviations pop up, spread more or less strongly, and then disappear again or become dominant, depending on the question if they are favorable or not.
limiting your genetic pool down to 10% within just one generation would rather be the opposite of evolution. instead of having a wide variety of traits that can be exposed to the trials of time, you are now locked into one niche and if you chose poorly, this will have disastrous consequences.

there is no guiding force behind evolution, it is simply a process that happens over time, and dependent on the environment. a trait that might be beneficial today might as well be a drawback 4-5 generations down the road, when the conditions have changed.
right now being a dumbfuck retard who leeches gibs and fucks every dumb hole he can get his hands on definitely leads to more offspring than being an upstanding and productive citizen, but it would backfire quickly as the host is overburdened by the parasites and can no longer feed them.
>>
>>524263225
>Muh familial honor
>Muh izzat
Shitskin.
>>
>>524262703
what is a woman tho?
>>
6 years celibate now, I wish I never had sex in the first place and stay caste.
>>
>>524263508
Total Fuckboy Death!!
>>
>>524263177
Make her pursue you or it won't be worth it.
>>
>>524264684
they would plap the 6-7 when the 8-9 is ignoring them
>>
>>524262703
I'm 37 and in 2025 it's been 5.
>>
>>524264396
It's self reported and women, so totally worthless data.

Statistics where the status is self reported are unreliable. Involve women and it's completely false. They report what they feel, not what can be proven.
>>
File: IMG_2008.gif (335 KB, 220x122)
335 KB
335 KB GIF
>>524265168
Yes, I agree. The diversity that women argue for doesn’t exist in their mating or sexual selecting. Giving them back the key to mating leaves out valuable outlier traits that are clearly productive or useful. Indeed, the institution of monogamy was helpful in diversifying genetic traits, and then you let nature and reality select what survives. Letting women do it is literally retarded and will lead to extinction, cosmically.
>>
>>524262703
depends what audience this youtuber caters to. if its your regular minecraft lets player or some sort of vidya ""enthusiast"" the only females they are aware of are 2d anime. if its chad based, general interest channel then its another whole story. besides, lets not forget that 90% of internet users are just that - they rarely met women, because they dont even want to. you think those who watch youtube for prolonged time and browse web go out clubbing or some shit? never. thats like entering a church as asking who there believes in God? well obviously everyone. survey should be done in public, in real life, on the streets or smth.
>>
>>524264684
All 6s and 7s and below have infinite options in their phone. The women who have a stable bf got into that relationship in high school
>>
>>524265663
All right, there was one done among male university students and 66% said they had not had sex while at university
>>
>>524265718
my ex gf showed me her phone once
it's utterly insane how many men she could hit up
on apps, websites, old friends, it's utterly insane
she pulled up one dating app and she was scrolling endlessly
through random dudes trying to hang out with her
this is a woman in her mid forties with four daughters
>>
>>524265824
can you even imagine what it's like for the hot young ones?
it's no wonder they act the way they do they are oversaturated with choices
>>
>>524262703
>56% of those who answered reported that they had ZERO sex in the past year. That's more than half of the young men..
This is useless because the sample is not random.
>>
>>524265790
ok if its true, then its a legit survey. i would like to know which uni it was done? and which faculty? reminder that IT students rarely experience sex. how about business,economics,politics?
>>
>>524264684
six seven WOOH
>>
>>524265824
>>524265881
Young women are more aware of their astronomical sexual value than ever, all the way down to teenage thots
>>
Why bother anymore? I’ll die fighting instead. Revenge for the lives unlived.

No teenage romance? No wife before 30? No virgin gf?
I want more nihilistic shooters.
>>
>>524265902
We wouldn't be able to find the source of the study. The telegraph article that sources it is (((paywalled)))

Total journalist death I guess
>>
>>524266129
It’s not astronomical, it’s just because men don’t have wombs are women are retarded
Ok, maybe there is something astronomical about the math
>>
>>524262703

The trick is to hunt down those guys getting 11+ and kill them.
>>
>>524264396
They share a few guys but they don't know it
>>
File: 1659751103539195.png (13 KB, 250x197)
13 KB
13 KB PNG
>>524263364
>>524263996
What's really fucked is that women are getting "what they want" in an immediate, short-term sense but it's a pyrrhic victory, because like >>524263996 said, what they're really chasing is commitment from a high-level male and the sex, which for a lot of guys would be the whole point, is more of a test drive for them while searching out the ideal husband (or at least, sperm donor). But even though they're directly responsible for the 80/20 rule they never seem to grasp its implications, i.e. that even if every guy out of that 20% settles down with a roastie in the end that still leaves the other 60% left with no chair when the music stops.

And by the time it reaches that point there's no going back for either party. The women are too used to being picky to admit what their realistic options are and the still-available men are so used to be being out of the game they don't want to even play any more. You wind up with bitter, childless women or singe mothers and a bunch of men so apathetic and (justifiably) misogynistic they can't be bothered to pluck the remaining low-hanging fruit because they realize it's not even worth it. Everyone loses in the end.
>>
>>524267805
Yet they sit around in friend circles and at work talking about the exact same std they suddenly got
>>
>>524263996
> If the old hag aged out of reproduction, what's even the point?
Top 0.1% here. A harem of old gals is great for grandmothering duties, for teaching your wives how to wife properly, and are outstandingly submissive sexually when you want to be serviced the way you like it. Not only that, but their age means they don’t get knocked up.
>>
File: IMG_3456.jpg (24 KB, 436x210)
24 KB
24 KB JPG
>>524262703
>66% of young men are single while the majority of young women were in a relationship
>the gender ratio between men and women is 1:1
with whom are they having those relationships?
>>
>>524263769
Found the idrama lab poster.
>>
>>524270861
>with whom are they having those relationships?
Older men, and "situationship" harems with the Chads.
>>
>>524270861
Dogs, donkeys, dildos, lush, lovense, phones, bottles, drug addicts, homeless people, dubai sheikhs, johns… and their bosses
>>
>>524262703
I do 3-4 young 18 year old ladies a week, but I also live in Thailand .
>>
>>524262866
Colloquially, it does. The majority of people know that the phrase "been intimate with" is synonymous with "had carnal knowledge of". If that confuses you, I wanna know what part of bumbly fuck you're from where you havent had access to the internet or greater American culture for the past 10+ years.
>>
File: IMG_3957.gif (1.5 MB, 512x284)
1.5 MB
1.5 MB GIF
>>524262703
Fags
>>
>>524262703
>tfw too 50% of men who can get pussy
Lmao you guys are fucking losers
>>
>>524262703
>What the fuck is going on exactly?
low birth rates means low supply of young women for young men. older men still want young women so now you have too many men competing for same (shrinking) demographic of young women. end result = many single young men. this in turn leads to social instability and decline of living standards (because men aren't doing anything anymore).
>>
>>524263225
line was too long
>>
>>524262703
i report 0 sexual activity in the last 35 years
>>
File: 1766542770800757.png (2.67 MB, 1255x2256)
2.67 MB
2.67 MB PNG
>no sex for more than seven days
How is this even possible?
How do they survive?
Puzzling!
>>
>>524262703
It's over for us non-Chaddites but we can play vidya and have fun voting for far right stuff for lols.
>>
>>524272067
>i report 0 sexual activity in the last 35 years
I'm tempted to ask if you had it before...
But, even if you're bretty good at it, it's just sex.
>>
>>524262703
How can people be sexless in 2025 when Grindr literally exists?
>>
>>524272073
You're talking out of your ass with the "white history" ones in the bottom right, Sanjay. All of that Wolf of Wall Street stuff is actual garbage though
>>
>>524262703
I am someone who had lots of sex, I was never someone to have one night stands.
I generally had friendship/date then sex.
Alot of guys skip straight to the sex in their minds without the baggage that comes with it. There's actually effort that goes into it, and sometimes its just not even worth it. Sometimes you just don't want to waste the time or you are pre-occupied with other things.
>>
>>524272232
because heterosexual men are heterosexual. they want to fuck a pussy, not an asshole
>>
>>524262856
>t. Idrama lab outing themselves
>>
>>524269612
lmao. just ask girls where they met the guy they're in a situationship with
>friends (they're all dating the same guy)
>instagram (they're all dating the same guy)
>dating app (they're all dating the same guy)

>>524264396
have you considered thinking about it? take 10 guys and 10 girls, 2 guys date 8 of the girls. 80% of girls are dating, 20% of guys are dating. you're assuming it's 1 guy for 1 girl, you're assumption is wrong.
>>
>>524264396
They're banging older men, no shit. I never had sex until I hit my late 30's. It's never been so easy.
>>
>>524271943
not really. I had sex with 3 girls last year but none were very intimate with me they just used me for my huge achlong. yes this makes me sad. I won't respond to ur replies
>>
>>524262703
A jewtuber with a channel full of content tailor made for virgins gets such an outcome? This truly boggles the mind.
>>
>>524272388
The guy Wolf of Wall Street was based on was Jewish, naturally.
>>
>>524272892
kys, faggot retard



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.