[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Electron from near neucleus shell to upper shell creates a soft-xray.
Electron changing direction near the neucleus creates a soft-xray.

What if an inner electron that, after fission, is no-longer needed, that had bound the 2 pieces,
being ejected or released creates the gamma ray and the hard xray?

What if, being that the fusion fuel uses neutron-laden actnides of elements; the fusion is not of
4 protons as suggested, but instead 4 neutrons come in close proximity, 2 lose their inner electrons which are unnecessary and ejected or released
producing the soft-xrays. Unneeded excess neutrons in the system create free fast neutrons. Some free protons come in close enough proximity in the plasma to an ejected electron to capture it as an inner electron to form a neutron for a time; which later decays to standard hydrogen
(The soft-xray producing electrons perhaps moving from the inner-electron to the close-to-nucleus orbital?)
>>
>>524300630
Nukes are fake, and real nuclear science is all kept secret anyway. None of the real research is available to the public domain.
>>
File: shinobu-oshino-shinobu.gif (1.05 MB, 498x401)
1.05 MB
1.05 MB GIF
Would white people be mad?
>>
>>524300695
This isn't public domain research.
Did you not see the word "inner electron"?
It is a thought experiment using the "neutron is a proton+inner-electron" idea.
>>
>>524300808
None of the research material you find on the internet on the subject of nuclear engineering is real due to proliferation risk. It's all kept under lock-and-key at key institutions.

Everything you find on the internet regarding nuclear science is made up science fiction slop masquerading as real, reproducible science. Good luck reproducing any of this, by the way.
>>
>>524300949
It isn't public domain research: it is a thought I had in the shower.

What are you talking about?
Anyway I have books from 1952 atomic energy commission that were then classified in the 1970s. Not from the internet.
>>
>>524300949
>Thought you had in the shower under water is from the internet
Did you read any word in the thread?
>>
>>524300949
>Good luck reproducing any of this, by the way.
Getting snippy now?
Why?
I'll go back in the shower and have the same thoughts: reproduced.

You mad about something?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.