EU anons, are you glad that the Trump administration is sanctioning EU officials who are censoring freedom of speech in the EU?
>>524300702Yea
>>524300702yes but would be better if we stop doing it by ourselves, like stop electing women into eu parliament
>>524300702None of these problems would exist if we just banned US social media in Europe 2bh
>>524300705First off Romanian social media is just going to another country and stealing a purse from a woman in Germany
>>524300706damn you destroyed him
>>524300702moloch's strongest chomo soldier
>>524300702We fucked up lads.
>>524300702>>524300709Why does Europe consider freedom of speech extreme?
>>524300710Or bonkers
>>524300702i hope both meet a very terrible fate that would leave historians shocked and disgusted by its overblown cruelty, eine schneise der verwüstung, ein meer aus tränen
>>524300712Werner Herzog ladies and gentlemen! Cue the intro!https://youtu.be/SAuqQr5YtjY?si=pAJkHNjsDSeVchW6
>>524300713kek
>>524300702he should do even moreair strikes on whoever thought the cookie pop up shit was a good idea
>>524300712What is your ideal overlord excruciation scenario, germanon?For me, it's crucifixion, but additionally flensing a strip of skin off a different part of their body every thirty minutes or so and throwing a fistful of salt in the wound.
>>524300702>fight online hate speechBut who decides what's considered hate speech is?
>>524300702muh free speech
>>524300712Based
>>524300717George Soros.
>>524300702>US sanctions on the ICC judgesnot a peep>US condemns foreign quangos trying to use the EU to censor American media and control their access to the internetRULE OF LAW IS UNDER ATTACK
>>524300721To be fair the whole reason our country even exists in the first place is because a European country's court that doesn't represent us attempted to enforce rules upon us and it pissed us off to the point that we declared an independent nation. The ICC's jurisdiction is the literal antithesis to our constitution
>>524300722It really isn't. Also the US can't really pull that card on one hand but then use third party courts on the other as a way to target specific individuals (or bail out others).
>>524300722The US exists because the UK wanted to ban the slave trade and the US threw a fit.
>>524300723As a nation that only gained independence from Britain because they literally didn't want you anymore, I don't take the opinion of your people seriously in regards to my country
>>524300702Dear americans,Please work on your marksmanship skills. Every able-bodied citizen should be able to make a shot like this. You can't pride yourselves on being a gun culture if you can shoot worth shit.
>>524300724Meme argument, slavery actually continued in the British empire past the point where they banned it. In fact slavery did not get fully eliminated in the British empire until 1833 long after the independence of the United States. It's not even arguable.
>>524300702Boring just released the pdfiles of Trump.
>>524300727Read the primary documents and seethe. Your 'Founding Fathers" wouldn't shut up about slavery and how much of an injustice it was for British Parliament to even consider robbing them of their "property".
>>524300729Your historically wrong and revising history. Slavery was not fully abolished in the empire until 1833 where the slavery abolition act was put into place by the British Parliament. Even to that point slavery still existed in the Raj until 1843 East India company act. It's a silly argument created by British people who have no clue about their own history.
>>524300730https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRoP_u_1SpM
>>524300730You're*
>>524300731You're ignoring the whole argument about taxation without representation which was the main reason for succession from the British empire. It's silly to state that the whole reason for succession was based on slavery alone. That's something some retarded lefty at a community college would get an d on a history paper for stating
>>524300733>taxation without representationAfter the US declared independence, the only people who could vote were free, rich, White men, who formed only 6% of the American adult population. So the American congress wasn't any more representative than the British parliament, American independence didn't accomplish anything for the average American.
Imagine being so lonely that you have to discuss muh free speechz on christmas evelol, you guys are pathetic
>>524300706
>>524300722The ICC is separate from this scenario. It's not European, it's part of the UN and ultimately the US is to blame for "international law" and the loss of face due to hypocrisy in not following itBy contrast, the attempt to regulate American internet companies is because the Eurocrats don't have the power or the means to impose a "great firewall" (iron curtain) and create a European internet under their control, so they presumed to use leverage over American internet infrastructure to achieve their goals. In a similar way that Five Eyes spies on Americans and manipulates the media on behalf of the "blue team" in America (in a way that the formal American government can't officially do), they presumed that direct state control of internet censorship would be willingly outsourced from America to the EU.
>>524300734Yeah and the British empire no longer exists for that same reason if we're talking about things in the past.
>>524300726>he thinks that was a real assassination attemptLay off the sahti, Pekka.
