So was Hitler the Second Coming or what?
>>524317241Nigga hitler and the Nazis were disgusted by the church and wanted to exile them from their culture as it directly undermined Germanic traditions.
>>524317348No Mohammed. That's another Jewish lie.>"Hence today I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: In defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord.">Mein Kampf 2.27 (Dalton translation)
>>524317241yes
>>524317348jesus would be disgusted by todays church too
>>524317625if jesus was on hitler's side why did he lose pathetically and kill himself?
>>524317790Jesus lost pathetically and killed himself too, retard
>>524317625You clearly are an amateur when it comes to Hitler’s worldview and the Nazi philosophy. Hitler was never a servant of the church, or a participant of the belief. When he speaks of the lord, he is not referring to Jesus, or the Christian interpretation of the lord. His enemy was in fact the church, that includes all its various forms. It manifested primarily through attacking the Jewish religion as it was the most damaging to the Germanic culture, while covertly, the Christian church was the secondary objective. Here is a direct quote from Himmler supporting my statement: The Reichsführer-ᛋᛋ Field Command PostHH 24/43.5. March 1943.“It does not surprise me in the slightest that the churches would proclaim such things from the pulpits. I KNOW THAT THE CHURCH IS OUR ENEMY, and I also know that the stupidity of many individuals who still follow the Church is considerable. Likewise, I fully expect the Church to harm us wherever it can, both as a collective body and through many individuals. But since I know this, I do not get upset by every individual case. In fact, I would even be surprised if they did not do so. I only intervene in cases where the damage caused by our enemies, whether overt or covert, would be too great. In many other cases, I do not even think about taking action or letting it upset me."— Heinrich Himmler
An additional quote from Himmler further solidifying that the church was never an ally of Germany but in fact an enemy:Original transcript of Himmler's May 5th, 1944 speech:"We are NOT Christians - THAT IS OVER, but there has never been one among us who did not believe in a God."
>>524317241>Was drowning but saved by a priest Maybe
>>524318228Heil victoryHeil wotanSieg heil viktoria
More on Hitler and the Nazi philosophy:>The dominant misunderstanding of the Second World War, and especially of Nazi Germany, lies in the insistence on framing it as a purely political, economic, or racial conflict. At its core, It as a war against what I define as “the church,” not as a building or a denomination, but as organized religion in all its forms. The church being any system that invokes the divine in order to extract obedience, dissolve accountability, and override human conscience.>The church functions as a parallel sovereign within states. It presents itself as morally superior, transnational, and timeless, while operating as an internal entity that undermines state authority. It reshapes law, morality, and loyalty by appealing to something divine and therefore unquestionable. Once something is declared divine, resistance collapses, because opposing it becomes heresy rather than judgment. In this way, organized religion represents the greatest danger to human consciousness; it removes responsibility from the individual and relocates it in an abstract, untouchable authority.>Hitler’s system represented a prototype for a state without this kind of church. I am not claiming it was perfect, moral, or without flaws. I believe it deliberately eliminated organized religion as a rival authority and replaced it with myth, legend, pagan symbolism, and national destiny. This was not accidental or malicious. It was an attempt to restore what I see as an ancestral Germanic order, one rooted in mythos and cultural identity rather than centralized dogma. Christianity, in my view, was never indigenous to Germanic culture; it was imported, foreign, and incompatible, originating in desert civilizations and migrating north by attaching itself to emerging states in order to siphon power.
>Organized religion replaces legality with absolution. Crime becomes sin, consequence becomes confession, and accountability dissolves into forgiveness administered by intermediaries. This allows individuals to escape responsibility not through law, but through ritual.>The targeting of Jews fits into this broader structural conflict. Not in a simplistic or purely racial sense, but because Judaism, as a system, resembles what I define as a church. It has elders, interpreters, teachers, and an internally coherent moral-legal framework rooted in divine authority. It functions as a people without a state operating within states, which mirrors exactly how churches behave; transnational, internally loyal, and legally distinct. This resemblance is not incidental. It reflects a deeper opposition between homogenous nation-states and systems that transcend borders while claiming moral supremacy.>The concept of a transnational moral authority is inherently destabilizing. When morality and law are allowed to exist outside blood, land, and shared identity, a nation becomes vulnerable. Its people no longer prioritize their own group, culture, or survival, but instead submit to external arbiters of right and wrong. While those arbiters may sometimes offer valuable insights, there is no guarantee they will act in the host nation’s interest. This creates an opening for corruption, manipulation, cultural erosion, and eventual collapse.>When morality is monopolized by an organized religious structure, whoever controls that structure effectively controls the population and the state. This is more dangerous than any myth-based or culturally grounded system because it claims divine inevitability and suppresses dissent entirely. In contrast, myth, legend, and national symbolism do not claim universal moral jurisdiction. They bind a people inward rather than subordinating them to an external, eternal authority.
>It is incorrect to frame the Nazi model as merely exchanging one form of oppression for another. In my view, the church is not just another power structure but one that is fundamentally incompatible with Germanic culture. Pagan belief systems were never centralized, priest-dominated, or dogmatic in the way organized religions are. They were decentralized, symbolic, and culturally embedded rather than institutionally enforced. For that reason, I do not see the Nazi rejection of organized religion as a lateral shift in domination, but as an attempted restoration of an older cultural order that preceded foreign religious imposition.>What distinguishes Germanic pagan traditions is not simply their mythology, but their lack of centralized authority. There was no universal priesthood, no singular interpretive body, and no claim to absolute moral jurisdiction over all people. Myth functioned as narrative and identity, not as an instrument of legal or moral coercion. This decentralization, in my opinion, made such systems fundamentally different from organized religions that consolidate interpretive power and demand submission.>These traditions were not universalist or abstract. They were kin-based, land-bound, and pre-state. Morality was inseparable from lineage, territory, and obligation to one’s own people. There was no ambition to govern humanity, only to preserve the integrity of the group. This is fundamentally incompatible with systems that claim universal moral jurisdiction over all peoples.
