What will be the impact of America's lack of meaningful Invention Secrecy regulations, particularly in light of the onerous costs of the very patent protection upon which our Invention Secrecy Act is predicated?In the past, the United States has derived decisive advantage from being first to have GPS and guided munitions, the first to have phased-array RADAR, the first to have nuclear weapons, et cetera.Those technologies came through talent pipelines in which essentially everyone who wanted to participate could do so. The NRO used to hire people right out of Secondary School in the 1960s and people who wanted to attend university could do so affordably.Since that time, a number of troubling developments have redirected that pipeline in a manner which ensure that intellectual property will go in every which direction except toward government research agencies.In the late 1980s, under pressure from President Reagan to reduce wasteful government spending, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office implemented an undeclared policy which took the rate of rejection for Pro Se patents from 15% to 97% in just a few years. This unofficial policy of indiscriminately rejecting Pro Se submissions has driven the cost of patents up to $10,000 each.The problem is that the Invention Secrecy Act, before it can empower the government to utilize or restrict a military-applicable patent through a gagging order issued to an inventor, requires that a person first apply for patent protection.Today, the government actually imports foreign spies to perform research at our universities due to a belief that America is not producing a sufficient number of young people interested in science and technology. There are, of course, plenty of Americans who are interested in science and technology, but unlike in the 1950s and 1960s, those who have that interest are told that they must pay upwards of $100,000 to obtain a Bachelor's Degree.
In such a climate, the vast majority of those with the interest and aptitude to pursue careers in R&D are not welcome in the workforce due to corporate policies designed to enrich universities by setting forth an absolute requirement that degrees be obtained, thereby allowing universities to charge any amount of money they like for a degree.The result has been that the very sort of revolutionary new technologies which will provide a decisive advantage to the wielder in the next war are often given away on the Internet by people who are told that their lack of a credential makes them unworthy to own their own intellectual property or to make project proposals. Instead of being appropriately classified, that information is being exploited by China and to a lesser extent by Russia, but only makes its way to the American government insofar as plagiarists who meet all of the absurd requirements listed in the Federal Acquisition Regulations take such work and claim it as their own.The average result of this system has been that a stunning transfer not of classified nor trade-secret technology, but public domain technology, has occurred and the consequences will likely be grave for the United States, which habitually discounts ideas from those who do not hold the right credentials and demonstrate the expected avarice through the obtention of a patent.What technologies will come to define the 21st Century? Thanks to the complete lack of any attempt to place restrictions on this information, I am allowed to show you.https://mega.nz/folder/YE5RzaRK#FqKLdtp5sdwxYr_7A37mewThis lack of control over technology also poses risks stemming from abuse of the technology by non-nation-state entities. The Hydrogen Anionization and Desification Mechanism, alone poses an absurdly high risk as the mechanism is likely cheaper to produce than a U.S. Patent.
If the government thought that the Epstein files were embarrassing, just wait
