This document makes so many references to co-conspirators, whose names are redacted. Why are the co-conspirators redacted? This is a violation of the Epstein Files Transparency Act by the Trump administration. And its the same throughout the entirety of the Epstein files. These aren't "active investigations" anymore, because they are 20 years old. If there are "active investigations" at this point then they're being used to provide legal impetus for the FBI and DOJ to protect the pedophiles. They are not real investigations and if much more time goes by the pedophiles will be dead from old age.>https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1256-04.pdf
I posted the wrong document FFS, here is the right one (but the document in the OP also involves the protection of co-conspirators)
>>524345492Why do you shills keep bringing up Epstein? The elections are over. You lost. It don't matter how many times Trump flew on his plane or whatever. You are a loser.
I will remake this thread afterwards. With the proper OP document posted. Here is the link to the document posted in the OP, which is also relevant>https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00037630.pdf
