Every white man on the streets is a "homeless vet" according to the far right even though most of them are drug addicts incapable of help. Many of them have been handed council flats, trashed them, refused to pay rent and then been evicted. These are not "homeless vets". These are not homeless because a Muslim was prioritised ahead of them. They are druggies.In any case, it is from the strangest of affairs that the far right on /pol/ would be so concerned with homeless vets on the streets given that day in day out there are threads in the catalog attacking them as Zogbot filth and traitor scum and even calling Muslims based for killing them - "Based Chad Muslim defending his land, that's what that sucker for the kikes gets for engaging in banker wars"If this is your attitude towards these alleged "homeless vets" why would you even care if they freeze to death sleeping under a bridge?
this thread reeks of curry
True
>>524367123man you sure need to fuck your life really hard to end up homeless as a vet in a first world country. dont they have great benefits after retiring? in any case ending up homeless after being a vet is a massive red flag that you are a retard
>>524367123Why do you blame immigrants/Muslims for "homeless vets" I don't.>but then attack vets as zogbots anyway?Because they ARE zogbots.Any more stupid questions?
>>524367751You might not personally but plenty on britpol do"these fighting age men put up in hotels while our boys are on the streets, there's homeless vets on the streets while we house illegals!"This is said on your side of the pond too pertaining to Latin American immigrants. Here the same rhetoric is used by Tommy Robinson and the patriot circuit. All these people have hundreds of millions of followers who echo what they say so it's hardly a minority view among the Right.
