>we aren't building enough houses>zoning and building will fix everythingthen explain why homes cost more every year in my flyover hometown despite 1) YoY population decline every year since 1980 2) fewer employment opportunities and 3) incredibly lax zoning and minimal red tape
>>524385319>1) YoY population decline every year since 1980 2) fewer employment opportunities and 3) incredibly lax zoning and minimal red tapedemand exists i other countries and america is the golden eggthe uh golden goose who would live in your town is supposed to be some entrpreuner but the society is not built to support his industry or eve nthe visage of hist person yet and the act and tasks of making that change would be revolutionary especilaly just to get people's attitudes away from now ppetty nation state conflicts of interest
people have to logistically and communicatively grow up like an extra head of space to accomadate concepts uniting many former dualismsim about half an hour through th e movie and already shaky logically from tire so i figured i would rest a bit but i also can't sleepwhat is new besides what i mentioned before about just actually modelling international trade on some public board that people can see the cliffnotes of?
russiahmmso it's basically fewer employment opportunities which has already been said and the homes wouldn't become cheaper but more affordableit's a question these days if people actually should expect to save money while working and under what conditions for which professions and with what externalities such as health bills
firstly my belief has been that sustainability is achieved as is happiness by people who have 1.5 kids per generation for 2 generations would halve the population so if this is unaffordable the question next becomes if there was a lack of proper discipline in the citizenry
migrants can come but under the guise they have no advantages to so speak of while we're investing in the developments of their home countries and providing nests to future industry that perhaps one day will allow people who have an american lifestyle to prosper somehow despite all known physics
there are countries that are getting their licks in for now we assume it would be easier to make nuclear or etc if cooperation is achieved across continents because the rockies sit atop valuable watertables as far as runoff is concerned and security has decided to be particular about itthe opportunities also would reasonably open up to the professionals of other countries because ours are busy doing things in other countries for the most part, this is actually the b tier set of tasks but we would need some trust
america believes in the individual transcending national boundaries and ties via a persons own network and other etc is the natural extension of the ideology and nationalism at the stage it becomes viable would only snuff the very idea of the country being an incubator for freedom itself
globalism is bound by the idea that local areas have their particulars though and as with any other kind of particulars obviously like duh you still have people who care about the local football team
>>524385319Homes are now financial products so boomers can watch line go up. Their value and function as a home is no longer related to their prices. Any politician trying to stop this would betray the baby boomer generation, their largest pool of voters.
if you want to put america first specifically because this is about americans then first of all the really successful ones are not presently talking to you, secondly, the rest will face external competition, but the local knowhow of what the culture really is still broadly has people keeping to cultural lenticular circumferences
>>524385319There isn't a housing problem. If you don't own a home you are just poor. There has always been a segment of the population who are poorfags who are never able to afford a home. The majority of millenials own the home they live in. Millennial homeownership passed 50% during the pandemic and has continued to increase.Adjusted for age, homeownership for Millennials and Gen Z is basically the same as it was for older generations when they were the same age. The overall homeownership rate for the US population has been consistently in the 60-70% range since right after WWII, there is no reason to expect that to change in the foreseeable future.Your peers the same age as you are buying houses. You are just a poorfag.
>>524387970boomers have hefty decisions to make about the future of financing america and the value of personal property as an idol across generations and industrial and demographic shifts and you not helping them or yourself undertand the significantly complex operations of the world means you're just voting for communism in the end hence my flag catch up dirt eater
>>524388010>Adjusted for age, homeownership for Millennials and Gen Z is basically the same as it was for older generations when they were the same ageThe chart you posted shows otherwise, and even indicates a decline of ownership for Millenials. You are just a retard that can't even read a graph.
They don't want paragraph spamming schizo's owning homes and to be quite honest I don't blame them after reading this thread. I don't want you living next to me, in fact I don't want you alive in general.
>>524388010it'll probably look like this
>>524385319>cost more every year in my flyover hometownthose towns also have restrictive zoning laws, you just aren't smart enough to know it
>>524385319Too many bagholders probably, can't sell for less or they'll lose their shirt
>>524388217basically when people are planning on inheriting it goes fewer now more in the end
>>524385319jews probably
>>524388010>You are just a poorfag.i make $143k a year, should be close to $150k when i get my raise. how much do you make a year?
>>524389289$150,001. Kneel.
Boomers /thread
>>524385319When they say build more houses, they mean state-produced suburban developments that pump out 10,000+ single family units sold under market value like they did for the boomers.
>>524389337i kneel.
>>524389750i actually lived next to levittown, pa for 6 years. fun fact, he was a jew and he sold homes in neighborhoods that were not to be inhabited by jews.
>>524389750>>524389938oh and those homes, the same exact homes built back in the early 1950s, go for $300-400k depending on which square foot model they are.
so everyone gets the answer was 2 and i was talking about how and why to fix that all through yesterday and now and it has a little schiz oa do with duels cool
russia
ah they both live and neither are executedare we moving on?
>>524388147Not it doesn't. You just don't want it to show what it clearly shows, because you don't like the facts conflicting with your assumptions about this supposed "housing problem."The homeownership curves are remarkably similar, considering it shows data across 60 years and 4 different generations of Americans. Especially considering the other relevant factors that have changed significantly over that same period, such as people getting married and starting to have kids later in life. Most of the gaps between curves are relatively minor and have more to do with larger trends in the overall housing market hitting the different generations at different ages.
dungeon masteroh i get it now
