But Nick (and by extension, all far-right people) came off as an utter sociopath in this interview. Any normal healthy person watching this is going to think he's nothing more than a hateful maladjusted loser, and they are going to (reasonably) apply that observation to all far-right individuals and movements. This wasn't a win for anyone who isn't already locked inside a self-brainwashing echo chamber. Yes, I'm white and no, I don't hate white people. You can oppose woke leftist bullshit without being a sociopathic edgelord.
Jai Hind to the NickPoster.>>524393538>Yes, I'm whiteLmao no you are most certainly not, saar. - 10,000 Izzat for pretending to be white.
>>524393538>Any normal healthy person watching this is going to think...No one cares what the normalcunt group thinks. They're increasingly irrelevant and powerless.
>>524393538Nick is not right wing, he's a leftist. Like all leftists his ideology is built on resentment and jealousy. He wants to overthrow the current order because he's a weird manlet who can't fit into current society.
The Haitian Massacre wasn't funny.The Trail of Tears wasn't funny.The Armenian genocide wasn't funny.The Holodomor wasn't funny.The Holocaust wasn't funny.Generalplan Ost wasn't funny.The Cambodian genocide wasn't funny.The Rwandan genocide wasn't funny. The Gazan genocide isn't funny.
>>524393780>The Holocaust wasn't funny.
>>524393855That scene and pic related were admittedly a bit much. Although Ralph Fiennes' character legitimately was an unstable psychopath in real life. The SS tended to deal with the Jews and Slavs in a much more detached way, for the sake of their own sanity. Also, as a code instilled by Himmler that they were selfless agents performing these atrocities in the name of duty alone.
>>524394116>SELF-HATING MIGAJEETI'm honored that you think I'm Indian or that you think I give a shit about Trump. It really is touching.>>524393636
>>524393538Any mentally healthy person wants to slaughter all the browns, as well as all the kikes and whites who stand in our way.
>>524393636>IzzatI have never heard that word at any point in my life outside of /pol/ in the last few weeks. >>524394116>Jews are paying people to anonymously smear someone on the internet This makes no sense. They can just anonymously smear someone themselves, or they can just get actual bots to do it. I guess they don't care about saving money that much after all.
>>524394290he's the only one that uses it, he's a mentally ill jeet paid to reply to a bot, don't give him (you)shttps://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/image/YGDXTaP9lWp4LJRbtXgwjQ%3D%3D/
>>524393538He admitted to being racist just to take that arrow out of Piers' quiver. I don't even consider Nick a racist and I think he denies it as well, he just didn't want to do the sparring of words that Piers would then make him do to play a clip then force him to defend it.
>>524394365>a mentally ill jeet paid to reply to a botThat doesn't even make sense. Also I'm seeing more people that aren't me bombing your threads. Hell yeah.
>>524393538Me mum mate. Stop giggling right now!https://youtu.be/sbSt6ylOX1E
>>524394365Weird. >>524394277You weren't always like this. It isn't too late to drop all this shit, anon. Don't tell me you're happy. Everyone who talks like this is miserable inside and is putting on a performance to cope.
>>524393538Normal people aren't watching anything with spic fagtes in it. I know what youre saying though, cause he looked fine to me
(((>>524393538)))>But Nick (and by extension, all far-right people)
>>524394617>You weren't always like this.when I saw my first buggerbeard shitrag on the bus going downtown with my mommy, I immediately felt the same way so yes I always was "like this". The only thing that has changed is that now I think people like you deserve the same fate as the buggerbeard shitrags.
>>524394617is not weirdjews have been doing this for decades, at first it was the JIDF but then they outsourced to cheaper entities, NGOs, spammer farms
>>524394634I saw a clip of Joe Rogan and Shane Gillis talking about how funny Fuentes is earlier and thought he bested Morgan
>>524394688A. Someone who gets the spotlight from a fringe subculture is going to be its representative to outsiders, whether they are an accurate representation or not. That's just the way things are, and this applies to all subcultures. People who aren't into emo don't care that My Chemical Romance isn't TRVE emo, or that Ghost isn't TRVE metal, etc.B. Most far-right people legitimately come off as just as if not more sociopathic than Nick did. There's a tiny minority who don't, like Jared Taylor, but then they get constant pushback from everyone else in that subculture for not being hateful and genocidal enough. Don't try to bullshit me that this isn't the case. I've been around long enough.
>>524393538>utter sociopathwhy? he just said "ok, I am racist and sexist" and turns out that Morgan didn't have any more arguments.Nick simply bested cancel culture which wants you to squirm "ohhh, there is CONTEXT, I did not really MEAN IT" - "ok, I am a racist, what now?" - *crickets*.He has many flaws but this interview was based.
>>524393765
>>524393855>The Holocaust wasn't funny.HOLLY JOLLY
>>524393538>Any normal healthy person watching this is going to think he's nothing more than a hateful maladjusted loserWhen the cohort of those "maladjusted losers" continues to expand I don't think it will matter how normies feel about it.
>>524394936>gets the spotlightthat's a nice way to say spammed on /pol/ about a thousand times a day. didn't read the rest of your post. kill yourself
>>524394493>>524394943Him admitting to being racist wasn't that bad in and of itself. He certainly could have spun that in a more thoughtful and nuanced way, though, instead of immediately coming off as a whining loser. The real problem is the simping for genocidal dictators, and the way it seems to be coming from some nihilistic edgelord contrarianism where everything is a joke.
>>524393538The clip of him being asked if hes racist and him just laughing was pretty funny. Other than that I didn't watch it or care because nicks a fag.
>>524393538nobody cares about being called names anymore stupid faggot
If you are under 30, white, and male, you thought Nick "won". Literally everyone else who watched that interview saw a little gay Mexican faggot trying desperately to be an edgy boy.
>>524395323>thoughtful and nuancedhello, therapyspeak?>simping for genocidal dictatorshe didn't do any of that during the interview.
>>524395410My dad is a late 60s boomer and he agrees with nick stupid cunt
>>52439519980 more years>>524395239The absolute state of far-right discourse >>524395428>thoughtful and nuanced is therapyspeakCope.>he didn't do any of that during the interview.Yeah he did. He defended idolizing Hitler and Stalin as cool. >>524395482Your dad thinks Hitler and Stalin were cool?
>>524393780>>524394115>>524394617There is no a single iota of material evidence to support the hypothesis gas chambers were used as a form of mass execution.The holocaust is a fabrication.Your tone policing of White people will end. No one cares about the social morays of a dying society. Grow up.
>>524395239He isn’t spammed. /pol/ is a shit board where nothing happens anyway.Nick threads, which we barely get, are interesting. Other threads are boring boomer slop.
>>524395410>if you have any testosterone at all you think Nick wonTrue
>>524395588My dad taught me that the holocaust was lies since I was a boy dumb faggot
>>524393538nick fuentes is a crazy radical right wing extremist and thankfully he's a tiny minority that will never gain real power and influence. The reality is that 90% of normal people aren't racist and once Democrats win the next election all the right wing rhetoric propped up by Trump will disappear and eventually white people that are are racist will die off and the new generation supporting love and peace between all races will take over.
>>524395615>Your tone policing of White people will end. No one cares about the social morays of a dying society. Hey, say what you want about me. But lay off the eels.
>>524393538"normal healthy people" drove us into the current shitshow with their pathetic weakness towards psychopaths.
>>524395766>the new generation supporting love and peace between all races will take over.People on here will fight back against this claim by saying it is impossible, but the truth is they are rabidly opposed to such a future regardless of its possibility. They don't want peace. They want war. It's why they constantly have to fill their minds with doom porn whenever their hatred starts to subside. It's legitimately some kind of sickness.
>>524395482He probably thinks Clav was "based" for running over some spic, too. Anyone who is a real adult sees Fuentes, Clav, and the like as stupid punks.
>>524396722your kike shilling no longer has power here, jew
>>524395588he specifically talked about aesthetics and them attracting a following.get over it: nobody cares about the Holocaust anymore, it has been 90 years now. in fact, we should very much care about moving on (see pic rel)How do you recognise a foundation myth? It fulfils three functions.1)It explains the origin and structure of the world (and society).2)It defines ultimate good and evil (and from those definitions are derived the values that are used to justify the holding of power).3)It determines what is held sacred in that society.For modern Westerners the story of WWII has become their foundation myth. It fulfils all three functions.1)We live in the ‘Post-War World’. The lines on the map, the institutions, the sense of what era we live in, all arise from the starting point of WWII.2)Ultimate evil is Nazis. Ultimate good is opposing Nazis. The values derived from these definitions are anti-racism, equality, diversity, anti-nationalism and so on.3)The only thing that is held sacred, that cannot be denied or mocked in the contemporary West, is the Holocaust.The problem is that all three functions are backwards or negative.Instead of the origin event being one of fertility and new life, it was a conflagration of death and destruction.Instead of ultimate good taking the central position in the story that slot is occupied by ultimate evil. Everyone knows that Adolf Hitler, the personification of evil, holds the centre point of the WWII story.Instead of that which is held sacred being something mysterious and sublime it (the Holocaust) is an obscenity.Having a negative foundation myth means the tree of life for Westerners is poisoned.
>>524393538kys after buying an ad >picrel of Piers "MAD FLAVA" Morgan
>>524393538SLAY, JEWSLAYER!!
>>524396989A. I can empathize with things that happened way longer ago than that. People on here are constantly crying over Christ's passion and that was 2,000 fucking years ago. "It was 80 years ago, bro" is such a stupid argument. B. Nazi Germany was a tyrannical dictatorship. The American ethos has always been opposed to this. This isn't something they had to be psyopped into thinking. C. The post-war "myth" has succeeded for almost 80 years in preventing major European military conflicts by establishing that we no longer tolerate larger countries massacring smaller countries for chauvinistic bullshit, until Russia invaded Ukraine. Which is why the outcome of that war is so important, and why the war itself essentially proved once and for all that Russia isn't part of "us".
>>524397162???
>>524393538White Nationalism: Fuentes advocates for preserving what he calls America’s "white demographic core." He has described himself as a "reactionary" and promotes the idea that the country should be a homeland for white people, frequently warning against the "Great Replacement" conspiracy theory (the idea that white populations are being intentionally replaced by non-white immigrants).Christian Nationalism: He identifies as a traditionalist Catholic and advocates for a Christian-centered government. He rejects the concept of "Judeo-Christianity," asserting that America was founded as a white Christian nation and should return to being a "Christian nation" where non-Christians—specifically Jews—would not hold office or influence.Anti-Democratic & Authoritarian: Fuentes has voiced support for autocracy and a "Catholic monarchy" or "Catholic Taliban rule" (in his words, "in a good way"). He has expressed admiration for historical dictators, including Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, and Joseph Stalin.Immigration: He calls for a total moratorium on immigration and "re-migration" (the deportation of people currently in the country) to maintain a white majority.Antisemitism & Holocaust Denial: Fuentes is a prominent Holocaust denier, famously using a "cookie baking" analogy to question the death toll of the Holocaust. He frequently blames "organized Jewry" for societal problems and has called for a "holy war" against Jews.Misogyny & Social Issues: He describes himself as a "proud incel" and a male supremacist, arguing that women should be disenfranchised (lose the right to vote) and that they are too emotional for politics. He has also promoted extreme anti-LGBTQ+ views.Foreign Policy: He holds an isolationist "America First" stance, particularly opposing foreign aid to Israel. He views the U.S. government as "Jewish-occupied" and argues against foreign interventions that he believes do not serve the white Christian interest.
>>524398442Part of the problem with Fuentes is that these positions are either completely ironic or deathly serious depending on who he's talking to.
>>524398442thanks ChatGPT
Problem is you're assuming Piers was interviewing in good faith. Why do you think he had all of Nick's greatest hits ready to play? And a video of a random jew telling everyone to buy his book (kek)? Right out the gate he doxxed Nick's dad to try wind him up. Piers is a creature of tabloid journalism; his entire MO is getting under his guests' skin with shitty arguments. So Nick's only viable defence was trolling him, which he did rather well.
>>524398801>Problem is you're assuming Piers was interviewing in good faith.I didn't assume or imply that. But Nick knew what he was getting into and no one forced him to agree to do the interview.
Nick is the next hilter and im tired of pretending he's not
>>524393538>Nick>far-rightSo you're genuinely retarded. Right.
>>524399151Nick sleeps all day, gets fast food, and then makes it late to his own livestream.
>>524399225Name a current figure who actually meets your definition of "far right" that more than 1% of the US population has even heard of.
>>524399082>Nick knew what he was getting intoAs does anyone watching the interview. Most of his views are pretty basic bitch traditional conservative/christian nationalist values, like his views on women's role in society; it's a rejection of modern liberalism. He just calls out jewish influence on top of that. You're either gonna subscribe to those viewpoints or not. An interview like this was never gonna be an honest analysis of Nick's thoughts; Piers just wanted some controversy for ratings, which is exactly what he achieved. So like I said Nick's only option was to troll Piers, to laugh in the face of boomer liberalism as a signal that he rejects it.For comments like "Hitler was cool," anyone that recoils in horror and puts on a big performance to act offended was never gonna be Nick's target audience anyway. Objectively the footage of all the Nazi military displays etc. are cool to most guys, which is why most of us enjoy war games/movies. Anyone acting offended just isn't being honest, or is a libtard and a lost cause.
>>524400662Regardless of his views, Nick came off as a pathetic immature manchild. I also disagree that the majority of "traditional conservatives" want to take away women's right to vote, or want a totalitarian theocracy. >Objectively the footage of all the Nazi military displays etc. are cool to most guys, which is why most of us enjoy war games/movies.You can acknowledge that without defending totalitarianism or minimizing atrocities.
>>524399151He's fantasizing about becoming the next Stalin. It's what far left communists like Fuentes does.
>>524395687>Nick threads, which we barely get,They have been at least one if not multiple every single day about Nick. And even if the thread is not about Nick, spambots flood other threads and spam him there.
>>524401122>came off as a pathetic immature manchildlike which parts specifically? if Nick had tried to have an honest longform discussion on each point Piers would just shuffle along to the next clip - it was all just probing for weaknesses. These tabloid shows aren't really ever going to be a source of intellectual debate.>I also disagree that the majority of "traditional conservatives" want to take away women's right to vote, or want a totalitarian theocracy. I agree. Nick will advocate to pull people further right on those issues but it'll likely remain unpalatable to most. But it was Piers' show, if he actually wanted to dig into that discussion he could've. >defending totalitarianism or minimizing atrocitiesI don't recall him actually defending or advocating for a Nazi regime. He just said the aesthetics are cool?As for the holocaust, I think he only comments on it so far as to point out the hypocrisy; every genocide can be commented on or reanalysed, but that one's off limits? Why? It's even a criminal offence to do so in many european countries. I don't think he'll vehemently argue in favour of a specific number of deaths or whether it happened, it's more a tactic to point out the kind of religious dogma we're forced to abide by on the subject, likely due to the level of influence jews have in policy making.
>>524398564>Part of the problem with Fuentes is that these positions are either completely ironic or deathly serious depending on who he's talking to.This is true. Like a jew, everything he says and its authenticity depends entirely on whats most beneficial to him in the moment.
>>524397444https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PccbL1GUNCUPiers was bragging to Nick about loving tampons so now he's Mad Flava Morgan
>>524402011>like which parts specifically?That was the overall impression> if Nick had tried to have an honest longform discussion on each point Piers would just shuffle along to the next clip - it was all just probing for weaknesses. These tabloid shows aren't really ever going to be a source of intellectual debate.I didn't say otherwise, but once again Nick knew all this going into the interview.>I don't recall him actually defending or advocating for a Nazi regime.He wants an authoritarian theocratic society. I agree he doesn't want actual Nazism, especially since he wouldn't make the racial purity cutoff. But he absolutely wants a dictatorship of some form. >As for the holocaust, I think he only comments on it so far as to point out the hypocrisyHe and his followers are laughing at dead jews with the whole "me mum died in the holly" shit. I don't doubt that dude's family members were actually murdered by the Nazis, and that's not funny. Just because the Holocaust happened and was awful, that doesn't imply that white people have to surrender their countries to third-worlders or any other bullshit that people start implying when you don't laugh with them at the Holocaust.
>>524393538>But Nick (and by extension, all far-right people) came off as an utter sociopath in this interview.No, he didn't at all. I'm not even antisemitic, but Americans and Jews have been playing the holocaust victim card as a final move to shame people into silence, and no further comeback.Nick demonstrated that the fatigue has gotten to the point where people are saying "I don't care about the victims" like people used to bend over backwards to avoid being labelled a racist and now they no longer deny it. Calling out the truth as it is, and saying "I am a racist" if you are a racist has its pros and cons but at least it's the truth. Was it better when everyone was lying or in denial?
>>524402396>I didn't say otherwise, but once again Nick knew all this going into the interview.So then what would you have had him do? If intellectual discussion was off the table he may as well make it entertaining.>authoritarian theocratic societywell it's one of many possible prescriptions to remedy the direction our society is moving in currently, which by most metrics is getting worsethe thing is he's only doing a talk show, not running for office; it doesn't really matter if he has views you disagree with because he's not imminently going to have them all implemented... in fact the establishment still wants to cast him out entirelyas an example he's almost entirely against the death penalty, whereas I'm absolutely for it - people can still think for themselves when hearing from him>are laughing at dead jews with the whole "me mum died in the holly" shitI think again he's just making an overtly cruel rejection of the attempted emotional blackmail by having some random jew he's never heard of telling him to back off. By making a joke of it he was basically just telling him to fuck off. Because really what is so dangerous about the actual points Nick makes on his show when he's speaking seriously? He just gives names and explanations of how the most influential, richest jewish billionaires organise in their own self interest. That's it. He's obviously not advocating for genocide, he just doesn't want to be ruled by a tribe that puts their own interests before his. Piers could've asked about it, but again he didn't.
Nicker fatigue
>>524403709>So then what would you have had him do?Either don't do the interview at all, or act more like Jared Taylor. I don't think Fuentes is intelligent, mature, and/or composed enough to do the latter, though. >as an example he's almost entirely against the death penaltyWait what?>He's obviously not advocating for genocideNot right now. He's advocated for a holy war against Jews, and while I don't think he agrees with Nazi racialist pogroms against Jews, he almost certainly agrees with past Christian religious-based ones. He also has a history of denying his more radical positions as just ironyposting whenever it's convenient for him.
>>524393538>came off as an utter sociopath in this interview.no they didn't fuck to the nursing home boomer
>>524404176I haven't really watched jared taylor so I can't speak to that, but either way he's just his own character; he has an edgy sense of humour but can still articulate his thoughts well when it actually comes down to it>Wait what?https://xcancel.com/FuentesUpdates/status/1998814978267140432#m>Not right now.cmon man... it's a holy war in the sense that judaism is so antithetical to christianity I guess, but to start asking for crusades? jews would love nothing more than to have him start fed posting shit like that... I think you can rest assured it won't come to that lol
>Any normal healthy personare you sure that's a real thing?
>>524393538Why would he engage in good faith with someone who wasn’t engaging in good faith?
>>524393538>You are bad because you are a virgin>Therefore having sex is a virtue>Which would make Andrew Tate a saint>But he is also bad>Don't talk about my wife who chose me for money and tweets about wanting to have sex with other peoplePiers lost hard, I can tell you the downtrodden youth of today who will never own a house can sympathise with Fuentes because boomers stole everything and left us with nothing, and boomers are totally ignorant to the harm that they have inflicted upon society
JEWS PAY STINKY PAJEETS TO SMEAR FUENTES ONLINE:https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/%22exposed%20FBI%20rat%20running%20an%20FBI%20honeypot%22/SELF-HATING MIGAJEET POSTING THIS PASTA WITH HIS INDIAN FLAG:https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/text/139a5u%2A/country/IN/order/asc/https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/image/YGDXTaP9lWp4LJRbtXgwjQ%3D%3D/BECAUSE OF THIS:https://rumble.com/c/nickjfuenteshttps://twitter.com/NickJFuentes>Piers Morgan is a LITERAL KEKhttps://rumble.com/v7311fe-piers-morgan-is-a-literal-cuck.html>NICK FUENTES X SNEAKOhttps://rumble.com/v72zxt2-nick-fuentes-x-sneako.html>Richard Spencer Interviews Nick Fuenteshttps://rumble.com/v72x0s4-richard-spencer-interviews-nick-fuentes.html>Jewish Mafia Initiates HOSTILE TAKEOVER of the Mediahttps://rumble.com/v72uljm-jewish-mafia-initiates-hostile-takeover-of-the-media.html>Piers Morgan Interviews Nick Fuenteshttps://rumble.com/v72rnle-piers-morgan-interviews-nick-fuentes.html>Steven Crowder Interviews Nick Fuenteshttps://rumble.com/v72m5wk-steven-crowder-interviews-nick-fuentes.html>Bradley Martyn Interviews Nick Fuentes | Part 2 https://rumble.com/v72iwhw-bradley-martyn-interviews-nick-fuentes-part-2.html>Jack Neel Interviews Nick Fuenteshttps://rumble.com/v727mqo-jack-neel-interviews-nick-fuentes.html>Tucker Carlson Interviews Nick Fuentes https://rumble.com/v70vq3w-tucker-carlson-interviews-nick-fuentes.html>Nick Fuentes on the PBD Podcast https://rumble.com/v6zd1l0-nick-fuentes-on-the-pbd-podcast.html>White People are DONE with Black Violence https://rumble.com/v6sb2vf-white-people-are-done-with-black-violence.html>The Effort to Delegitimize Criticism of Jews https://rumble.com/v6s6jv9-the-effort-to-delegitimize-criticism-of-jews.html>It's Time to Tell the Truth about Jewish Power https://rumble.com/v4y2yc3-its-time-to-tell-the-truth-about-jewish-power.html
>>524394550This one is better.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uxwYlf_vGF0&list=RDuxwYlf_vGF0&start_radio=1>>524395323Hitler and Stalin killed me mum and dad, buy me book
>>524404746based xcancel user>I haven't really watched jared taylor You should. He's by far the best and most professional interlocutor when it comes to white nationalism. >but either way he's just his own character; he has an edgy sense of humour but can still articulate his thoughts well when it actually comes down to itHe was easily baited.>>524404844Yes. Come on now. >>524404970He didn't have to do the interview. >>524405084Him being a virgin wouldn't even be brought up if he didn't want to dictate how everyone else has sex, and didn't constantly whine about how much he hates women and how we wants to take their rights away.
>>524394116>>524405164
>>524405268>Him being a virgin wouldn't even be brought up if he didn't want to dictate how everyone else has sex, and didn't constantly whine about how much he hates women and how we wants to take their rights away.How is what he does in the bedroom relevant to the conversation at all, how many women do you have to pump and dump before you are allowed to say that women have too many rights?Women have sex with drug dealers and criminals, sexual status is irrelevant and Piers is using it to attack Nick's character not his arguments
>>524405676Why should anyone take seriously your opinions about women, sex, and marriage when you have no experience whatsoever with women, sex, or marriage?
>>524397412>we no longer tolerate larger countries massacring smaller countries for chauvinistic bullshit, until Russia invaded Ukraine.why do you niggers always have the most retarded takes you have to shoehorn into everything?
>>524405883I don't see an argument here.
>>524395410Shut up jew, why bother trying this? You and Piers lost, NJF won.
>>524405863>you can only talk about marriage if you have been raped in divorce court>you can only talk about sex if you become a degenerate and give in to hookup culture or risk getting raped by divorce>if you haven't fucked a women it means you have never, ever seen or heard onekekI mean, I know you are baiting, but it's been like... 3 generations already...? Or something like that, where majority have grown up in a divorced "family" and see shit for what it is. Like, c'mon.
>>524405975
>>524393538If you are with Nick you are against JD, Vivek, Ben Shapiro, and the rest of the Republican Party
>>524406340Did you intentionally miss the part where this applied solely to Europe and the last 80 years?
>>524406439You can very easily be against all of those people.
>>524406490Ukraine is not really Europe so if it doesn't apply elsewhere in the world it doesn't apply there.Not to mention the wars in former Yugoslavia which is in Europe and therefor belies the nonsense of your agitprop.
>>524405863Then does Piers having two marriages make him more authoritative on the subject?>Why should anyone take seriously your opinions about women, sex, and marriage when you have no experience whatsoever with women, sex, or marriage?Because its true that women don't have the same intellectual capacity as men, that they aren't held to the same level of accountability for mistakes and you can't argue your way out of this one that is why you use ad hominem
>>524406510so you're basically a democrat
>>524406611The last 80 years have been a comparatively unprecedented period in terms of a rejection of chauvinistic wars of conquest compared to virtually all human history before it. Fucking deal with it.
>>524406710No. Democrats like Islam.
>>524406439The same people who cover up for Epstein?
>>524393538QUIT SPAMMING EFEDS
>>524406705>Because its true that women don't have the same intellectual capacity as menShould the half of men with a below-average IQ not be able to vote either?
>>524393538>dying boomers watch and they seethe>annoyed Gen X watch and they don't know what to make of it>millenials watch and they either like or hate the guy as they did before >Gen z watch and laugh at the whole thingNo matter how you weave it, Piers Morgan looked like a massive retard
>>524393538He's le internet absurd guy
>>524405268>He was easily baited.into reaffirming positions he already held? Piers would show a clip of him and so he'd say "yes I agree with myself," and rather than Piers pressing any further he just called Nick a racist or misogynist and moved on - considering Nick has had such a massive increase in his following, would it not be worth actually asking why he holds those views, how he came to them, what a world would look like with them implemented? They're clearly resonating on some level. Piers is just stuck in the liberal boomer mindset that can't even compute an opposing worldview.
>>524406814Yes voting should be earned, I have always held this position morons and NPCs have too much power as it is
>>524395410Im 31, whiter than anyone on this board, and I think he won. He shoulda said he could get pussy anytime from groypettes though. I know some girls who would def bang Nick.
>>524406717>killing people because they don't follow the imperial orders from DC is not chauvinism actuallyCan you libshits even stop yourself from writing complete and utter insanity or is it compulsion like when we I write nigger?
>>524398442I've been watching a lot of his content lately and the Christian Nationalism part is wrong. He's just a regular Nationalist.He DOES think that government officials should be Christian, but otherwise he's for separation of church and state. If he's said anywhere he wants to bring back sodomy laws or some shit please correct me though.Anyways the reality is that young straight and mostly white men have been oppressed by the boomers in government and their birthright and future was sold off for cheap foreign labour; it's natural for them to be upset and until either the boomers all die or actually give young men what they want and rightfully deserve things will just get worse. Jordan Peterson has been talking about this for over a decade now and people just haven't been listening, and he is one of the boomers. Nick Fuentes is actually one of the more moderate voices in his movement and nobody is taking him seriously either.
>>524393538Piers stfu you loser bitch xD
>>524405164>>524393636Sorry, I had some family time
>>524394617Had a nigger as friend when i grew up with sleepovers and all.When we were 15 one of my friends of another group robbed his best friend for weed and guess what the little nigger did?He came to me with a 30cm hunting knife because i was the skinny White kid and the one that robbed his best friend was a 3 year older 6.2 and 115kg turk.He nearly stabbed me while i let him in in underwear and bathrobe because he was one of my childhood friends.Still have a scar on my hand because i had to push his knife away.Also all that while my mom was in the other room.Thats what niggers are and i will kill as many of them as i can
