Why mass surveillance is a bad thing? Would you accept it if it meant no more crime or violence like in the movie Minitory Report?I have nothing to hide so I don't care, it seems that most people against it are up to no good.https://www.instagram.com/p/DSr7VGNiBCx/?img_index=1&igsh=ZjN3ZDY0NWU3OWpl
>>524426320Kill glownegroids and torture them in Hell.
It's only bad if you have something to hide.
>>524426320Glowniggers are the scum of the Earth
>>524426320>Why mass surveillance is a bad thing? Because privacy and liberty is more important than "safety".ALSO, if the government track everyone and know everything, and become TRYANTS (like many times before in history), HOW DO YOU OPPOSE THEM???YOU CANT!!! Because like a DUMB KEK you have trapped yourself in a country where they have total power and control over you, and you cant even organise a protest in response because they will know and arrest you all before the sun rises.>Would you accept it if it meant no more crime or violence like in the movie Minitory Report?NOThe government is the BIGGEST MASS MURDER in ALL of history. More than all the wars and private murders combined by 10x. Never forget that.
>>524426320The worst complication I can think of is that it would all have to be publicly available for Freedom of Information Act requests.>Train AI to track your neighbor's movements over all recordings.>Task AI with the job to tabulate every traffic infraction, rolled stop sign, speed limit violation.>File each incident with local police with video evidence attached (automated by AI)>Police are required to investigate every criminal referral. Given the evidence, they have no choice but to send a ticket for each one.>Neighbor gets $20,000 in traffic tickets overnight. >Now offer that level of legal harassment to anyone against anyone as a service.Not to mention things like being able to stalk someone with pinpoint accuracy without leaving your mom's basement.
>>524426320The only people that need to be stripped of privacy entirely are billionaires and politicians. Instead they'll be exempt.
>>524426320You write like a foreigner. Consider going home.
>>524427103>The only people that need to be stripped of privacy entirely are billionaires and politiciansevery single politician, especially heads of state, should be forced to livestream their life 24/7
>>524427218>every single politician, especially heads of state, should be forced to livestream their life 24/7agreed, there is no reason a "public servant" should protest this.
>>524426320i will put my faith in glowniggers and the satanic 666 system when they start going mask off fascist against nonamericans and start getting this economy cleaned the fuck up. quid pro quo you black hearted faggots. at least pretend you want the citizens to prosper.
>>524426320Crime is already functionally not real. If you dont live in actual skid row you'll probably go decades without being the victim of a single crime even in relatively unpoliced areas. I never understood why people are so obsessed with crime when it's so uncommon.
>>524426320Your country gained independence by doing something illegal. The second amendment allows you to have guns and resist the government tyranny which would be illegal. Once they can ensure the "total security" they can change the laws into anything.
>>524426320>Why mass surveillance is a bad thing? Would you accept it if it meant no more crime or violence like in the movie Minitory Report?I wouldnt accept it at all. You are a kile if you are for it.
>>524427758*kike
>>524426320Because ultimately it's not used to prevent actual crime it's used to track dissidents.
