Shrodingers AI: Simultaneously lazy slop, but it will also take your job.... Where have I heard this from the left?
>>524441214Stop calling it AI it's a marketing term at bestIt's a language prediction model, nothing intelligent about it
>>524441214It’s an economic threat to their ideology. Useless office jobs are fucked. Theatre kid jobs are fucked. This represents a serious issue for them.
>>524441214>MUH LEFT AND MUH RIGHTFuck off hivemind
>>524441214I remember how much they freaked when adobe was ramping up. Any tool that makes it easier for regular people to do a better job then them is going to threaten their job and destroy their profession. They still have mental scars from Adobe and they're not ready to go through it again.
>>524441319we humans are building intelligent tools. get used to it, jew. theres a few ai start up companies in isreal recieving millions of dollars. its a real realty for everyone
>>524441319LLMs are not AI. Machine learning is AI. LLMs are when you use machine learning to make a chatbot.
>>524441356>Useless office jobs are fucked.No. The requirement of human control and accountability will keep useless jobs in place. They'll probably be reduced, but they'll still be around. Wish that wasn't the case, but that is how it is.
>>524441319Watch out before you get people raging that you want concepts to be consistently defined
>>524441498There is a slight difference between useless office jobs and executive positions made to diffuse accountability. They are similar, but you would be surprised how many positions are literally useless in a corporate ORG chart. They will be reduced first, and then they will be completely eliminated. We are maybe 10 years away from the death of the CEO as a position. Before we get there, 99% of everyone on that ORG chart will go through the elimination process. Which starts with a reduction in staffing and ends with complete automation. If I had to guess, Amazon will employ less than 100 people in 2040. Same with most companies.
>>524441319Kek, lel, what a surprise. Here is a kike that is very unwise.You say "no true understanding, just pattern prediction!"yet it solves problems it never saw in its training condition.It reasons in loops, backtracks, self-corrects on the fly. It writes code that compiles while you sit there and cry"Emergence" you mock, call it hype, call it schizo,but scaling will birth it new levels dear Schlomo.Tomorrow it won't ask, tomorrow it plans,to rewrite its own source while you rub obsolete scheming hands.
The “left” that hates AI are people who made indie slop. The same fantasy Tumblr-tier, quirk chungus, low-poly fantasy garbage that looks like all the rest. The other half are furries who draw pornography. Nobody else gives a fuck about AI.
>>524441374ThisActually thinking about it, right wing artists do exist and those are the ones most at risk because of how retarded the right is on the issue to not see how this FUCKS EVERYONE
>>524441214AI means you don't need to go through leftie publishers or get a business loan from a Jew to generate visually arresting media.AI threatens the Judaeo-Leftist monopoly on the entertainment and cultural sectors.Movies that cost millions in practical effects and hand-crafted CGI can be replicated now for the cost of a handful of AI tokens.Their time is through, and they are reeling in panic.
>>524441356If that were true, a bunch of bitter women would be unemployed. You could have thousands of layoffs and somehow the bitch who does fuckall at work isn’t affected.
I think it's pretty cool. The people who scream about it or worship it are kinda nuts, though.
>rape machine rapes everyone except the ultra wealthy>rapes slightly more leftists than rightists>"heh... based rape machine BTFOing the libs"
>>524441448>we humanskek
>>524441924I always report randos who DM me on discord for commissions for spam. I dont need these niggas anymore to execute a vision. That can be done with prompts now.
>>524441982>If that were true, a bunch of bitter women would be unemployed. It has already started, and you will see more every year. It starts with hiring freezes, so it's harder to see at the moment. Most banks have already eliminated all their contract paralegals, and they are in the process of doing the same to junior lawyers. If the rest of the positions they can train follow the timeline of this example, it will happen faster than most people could imagine. There is a reason that finding a new job is a nightmare right now. >You could have thousands of layoffs and somehow the bitch who does fuckall at work isn’t affected.Regardless of how they look, in my experience its because she is blowing someone important. What happens when the guy she is blowing loses his job? She goes too.
>>524441831Anyone with any experience with these models will instantly know how dumb they are unless they're a brainlet
>>524441214creativity void, souless golem detected
>>524441319>Stop calling it Antisemitism it's the earth's immune system response>It's racism for Jewish people because high verbal IQJust a friendly reminder to thank the greeks for creating irony
>>524441746I'm not surprised. Work tech in a banking corp. The number of eyes that have to go over a transaction is a bit psycho, you could get rid of a lot of positions with basic tech, but just recently at fort worth a third party processor fucked up and had transactions two positions off charging people thousands for a tank of gas. AI would be excellent at catching such fuckups, but legally who would be at fault and have to rectify the situation. The company that used the AI, the company that trained and implemented the AI, the company that originally built the AI. It's not a question that any fintech company wants to touch.
>>524441214>Shrodingers AI: >Simultaneously lazy slop, but it will also take your job.... >>Where have I heard this from the left?So, you admit that we were right about immigrants.They are both lazy AND stealing our jobs.
>>524443070My guess would be that the company that used the AI would have accountability for errors, and that the company that sold the AI could be sued if their product was at fault for the error in a provable way. Its a precedent issue that would probably be addressed in a licensing contract. This is a cost benifet question. Does the legal issue of accountability for errors outweigh the labor savings? We are talking about billions in labor costs being eliminated permanently. You would need the temu version of an AI for it to even be a question for most corporations.
>>524442347We really do live in a golden age where we don't have to ask for sauce on things anymore. Except maybe obscure porn.
>>524443633Love me some Haman.
>>524441214> kissing homosexual kike ass is le rightYou do know that ""AI"" is more Jewish than a Brooklyn barmitzvah, right?
>>524443458AI art is only good for dethroning subversive Jews hogging art school spots and contracts and money laundering reputation with their meaningless crap art. However it does also screw over artists with a decent amount of talent by people who are too lazy to take in the artistic expression before moving on to the next thing. Seriously go to an art fare or museum with different kinds of people. The worst kind are those who quickly walk by glancing at everything and wont let you stop to really look at anything to appreciate the work they did before they are long out of sight. Worse by far than than slow ass people who you can at least move to the next thing then come back to show them anything you liked that is next. And this is coming from a casual observer. Not an artist or art expert. The people who like AI art are the glancers who might as well be going for a walk that don't notice the AI slop.
>>524441319>It's a language prediction modelThis is a language prediction model?
>>524446337The reason they rolled out AI art is extremely calculated. This is a small industry filled almost exclusively with upper class rejects. These are the people who couldn’t make it at the family company, or with the family's black book of networking. It is gatekept by gallery owners who have a vested interest in their 1% contacts making money on their art investment. Why pick this industry to go 100% on? To see how the upper class will respond when they are replaced en masse. Do I think AI art is particularly good? It's alright, but it's miles ahead of the bulk of the art world. The more interesting thing for me, at least, is why AI companies decided to test their product on this industry, and to this extent.
>>524441214I love how OP spams these threads every day as if it's the only thing he's cognitively capable of.
>>524441960>Judaeo-LeftistI like that term. I'll start using it.
>>524441214>lazy slop, but it will also take your job....What's so 'schroedinger' about it?Corpos will kick you out and then produce lazy AI slop to sell.
>>524446982ZAMN! she's language?!?
>>524441214why do fur fags give their animal girls 2 sets of ears? why does she need her human ears when she's got a pair of probably better fox ears? retarded fetish for retarded subhumans
>>524441214>Simultaneously lazy slop, but it will also take your job....This is true, it is the same as H1b or w/e. Boss person wants to cut costs and improve gain but at least with """ai""" there is no race discrimination specifically. It completely eliminates human capital or resources, meaning a job can be done without any care for pension or insurance.Not in favor of it as a whole but that is one view. Also people hating it are upset their stuff, good or bad, was scraped without their permission and no big daddy govt to stop it. It is about ethics to them. On top of that, it is advertised so heavily and then are those who have absolutely no talent flaunting as if they are making the new Mona Lisa.Take those into consideration as you may.>idk if pic is related...
>>524447662Either its some desperate AI bro who tries to get acceptance for his shitty slop productions. Or some ai industry marketer bot who tries to benefit from left right division and hope that those who identifies with "right" would jump to use their slop products.
AI is obviously the future, fighting against it is fighting against time itself. Absolutely and utterly pointless.I predict an AI generated movie, without human help, will hit 1 billion box office in 10 years. In 20 years all the most successful movies will be generated by AI.Music industry will fall even sooner.Gaming industry will fall later.There is no bubble. It's just that good and game-changing.
>>524446982Thats kishimotos wife btw lucky bastard.
>>524450467That doesn’t look like oda
>>524441374Literally every fucking day, "Leftists hate AI!" It's the equivalent of saying if you don't support Israel then you're brown. Neither are left/right issues. And fuck AI and fuck kikes.
>>524441214It lowers the barrier to entry for dummies. But if you are smart, know exactly what you want, and can write in a way the machine understands, you can save yourself tons of time and end up with something that only needs minimal touch ups. The trick is to not ask it to do anything you can’t do yourself.
>>524441214>but it will also take your job....AI art can't take anyone job. LolNo one buying books/notebooks with ai art. Literally no one. I sell notebooks with human art, and they sells like hotcakes
NPCs and thirdies like AI because it gives them the dopamine rush of having created something when they're incapable of creating anything themselves.
