reminder that you should read books and educate yourself instead of replying to the same bait spam threads
and become more aware of the jewish worldview and how much control the jews have? no thnx
>>524454947Which book should I read anon
>>524455355>nobody is replying to my fucking shill memeflag thread so now im shilling the image in other threads>>524449964post hands and flag you filth
>>524455355well not necessary, books can also entertain you, writing in movies and games sucks>>524455442read whatever you want, politics, history, fiction, a programming manualwhatever cranks your shaft the most
>>524455616>read whatever you want,Ok dude this is what I'm actually reading rn
>>524456367you've been reading this for years now.
>>524454947Can you recommend some books then retarded nigger?
>>524454947
>>524456367Reported for antisemitism. WE WILL NOT TOLERATE ANTISEMITISM ON THIS WEBSITE
>>524456546>you've been reading this for years now.Mate you've been reading the Torah for 2200 years and that's fake too
>>524456598
>>524456639Carrier is a mediocre scholar. He is boring.
>>524456688Yeah, but what does that have to do with the fakeness of the Torah and the New Testament?
There isn’t a constant, repeatable recipe for effective political partisanship. Reading is good for boosting your overall brain performance, but you should never assume that what you are reading will be useful tomorrow.
>>524456756The Torah has been augmented heavily but the NT we have is 99% authentic as Jesus dictated it to his disciples.
>>524456610>He doesn't have the free will to take what he wants from other men and shape it to his needGuess getting fucked is in your nature, posting the images and works of others.
>>524456876>but the NT we have is 99% authentic as Jesus dictated it to his disciples.Nonsense, 90% of Mark has been copied directly from the Septuagint, and most of the rest was copied from Hellenic literature. There is virtually no "historical" material at all
>>524456943Historic it isn't exactly. You miss the point mate, it is a work of revelation. Jesus had the 4 gospels written in this way for a reason. There is no Q, the 4 gospels were written in tandem. The contradictions are there for a reason.
>>524457021>There is no Q, the 4 gospels were written in tandem.Ah, the magic fairy explanation for the synoptic problem
>>524456756The Torah isn't that important for jews and it's the only true part
>>524454947Philosophy books are for midwits thay need to be told what to think, fiction literature is basically netflix series tier, history books are propaganda at best, only diadactic schematic books matter yet I wouldn't consider them reading per se. Books are overrated, you're supposed to think, reading is no difference than listening to some faggot podcast
>>524457155it's the simplest explanation really. Jesus (the real one not the imposter that was crucified) dictated the gospels to his disciples, that's why they are so alike. Any other explanation gets you into inexplicable problems.
>>524457290>it's the simplest explanation really. Jesus (the real one not the imposter that was crucified) dictated the gospels to his disciples, that's why they are so alike.Yeah, either that or Matthew, Luke and John were just copying from Mark
>>524457408No. You are insist on the old way of thinking. They weren't copying they were adding for a reason. Each gospel is trying to tell a different message. The 4 gospels should be written together, saying that there are contradictions misses the point. Only then they can be understood. for 2000 years Christians haven't come close to deciphering them and sadly never will.
>>524457528>The 4 gospels should be written togetherRead together rather.
>>524457528>for 2000 years Christians haven't come close to deciphering them and sadly never will.I deciphered them for you two minutes ago. Mark wrote his Gospel, other Christian-ish sects from across the street didn't like some of it so they produced their own versions, copying word-for-word most of the time but making "corrections" when it suited them. Boom, one New Testament as ordered
>>524457687I expect more out of an English man. Do you really think that this could actually have happened? the whole rival faction theory is silly. The NT is a work of elaborate revelation and myth, the writers knew what they were doing, of course all according to the Master, the Lord.
>>524457687there aren't any evidence of such factions even existing. The early Christians were uniform.
>>524457808>Do you really think that this could actually have happened?I just explained to you, how it actually happened> the whole rival faction theory is sillyEvery single book in the New Testament is written in opposition to some other sect. Not just Paul's epistles, but even the Gospels.>>524457906>there aren't any evidence of such factions even existing.Ummm, what? What about the Ebionites, the Encratites, the Valentinians, the Alexandrian school, the Montanists, the Marcionites? For that matter, what about the worshippers of John the Baptist, Simon Magus, and even Paul?
>>524458131You insist still I see. Only when you release yourself of the scholastic scholarship of the last 2000 years will you see it. Rival factions write pamphlets not gospels.
>>524458131>Ummm, what? What about the Ebionites, the Encratites, the Valentinians, the Alexandrian school, the Montanists, the Marcionites? For that matter, what about the worshippers of John the Baptist, Simon Magus, and even Paul?what evidence is there that they wrote the gospels or even knew Jesus. The so called Paul never met him even he admits. Jesus was only known to the very few, the real one I mean.
>>524458275>Rival factions write pamphlets not gospels.Yes, they also write fake epistles which are a billion words long. See the Book of Romans as a good first example.
>>524458131Dennis Macdonald has come close to this realization. He has realized that the gospels copy each other in a certain manner based on older Greek myth. Tell me know what rival factions can do that?
>>524454947/pol/ posts infographics and has threads dumping info that consolidates the findings of experts and thousands of years of esoteric truths, I don't need your gay ass books
>>524458354>what evidence is there that they wrote the gospels or even knew Jesus.What evidence is there that Mark, Matthew, Luke and John even knew Jesus?
>>524458428Bingo. Paul's epistles are a work of facetious blabber. But not the 4 gospels. As I said they are too similar despite the specious contradictions.
>>524454947Oldfag here. Been here since 2015.What is this thread? The quality of threads has been getting worse in recent years.
>>524458487>Dennis Macdonald has come close to this realization. He has realized that the gospels copy each other in a certain manner based on older Greek myth.Umm, what? Macdonald argues (for example) that passages in Matthew, which are not found in Mark, are based in Greek Myth. Not that the Gospels themselves were written in the style of Greek myth. (The actual literary form the Gospels are imitating, if any, are the Ephesian Tales.)
>>524458657True. They probably are. Because again they were written as revelation and myth. But for a reason. Macdonald however blunders and falls back to the Q hypothesis and thus cancels out his work. But credit to him for seeing what he was able to see.
Lately I'm reading the Chronicles of Brother Cadfael. The stories take place in middle ages England. They're really entertaining and soothing, since the characters live in a /pol/ world.
>>524458131>>524457808You're an Englishman and a Jew, you should be plotting on how to screw the rest of us over and force your tranny BBC porn fetish on the rest of us, not bickering it out here on /pol/!
>>524458804I'm not a Jew.
