Does the obsession with fair-skin among many non-European cultures have to do with European colonizers?
>>524484246No it goes way back, in the ME for example people of fairer skin are treated better and seen as more beautiful. Ironically it's white people who love tanning the shit out of their skin.
Everyone finds it more aesthetically pleasing>muh signifier of not working in the fields>muh long tan and handsome>muh western beauty standardscope
>>524484246Don't post my wife here.
Yes previously, fair skin was seen as beautiful for only women now it's seen as better for both genders.
>>524484246It has to do with nobles not working in fields.
>>524484246Yes but not in the way you might think. It's not because modern colonization, it's because ancient Aryans (Atlanteans) were all over the world teaching the other races as masters, these darker races have a genetic memory: white skin=intelligence, strength, beauty, etc.The same reason why white men tend to have hard fetishes for non-white women: genetic memory of back when white men was going all around the world mingling with the women of the tribes they conquered
>>524484246White skin is objectively beautiful, and all shitskins know it
>>524484246>Nephilim
>>524484246The more you have to slave in the fields the poopier you look.
>>524484246The same reason people left Africa
