Why did Americans refuse to wear masks during COVID?
>>524547425>twitter rando has an opinionfuck off retard next time before you post consider offing yourself instead
>>524547425Not not about masks or anything else you're thinking of.They used morphine with some other drug in the hospitals. Stopped their lungs functioning. Quite litterally the medical system was killing people, you survived the cull.
>>524547425Better question: why didn't faggots stop having shit sex during AIDS?
>>524547425Do people actually believe the thin paper masks actually do anything?
1. The government lied and said masks did nothing2. They did this so the government could buy up all the masks left after the chinese bought everything THEY could3. Then the government flipped on a dime and told everyone to wear cloth masks4. The cloth masks did literally nothing other than cause drama due to government tyrannical overreachResearch showed that masks did nothing, IN TWENTY-TWENTY (2020). This research was published, misinterpreted, and ignored for political reasons for years until the Ukraine war broke out and distracted the media, which allowed the government to back down and save face.
>>524547599That's a different issue all together. Don't look to deeply into "bug chasers"
>>524547584>>524547425Not to mention Japan didn't count people with gunshot wounds or other various comorbidities etc... as covid deaths. I doubt their hospitals got 10k per covid death either. Also you're a jew.
>how did they do it?They didn't -- nothing you were told was true, you stupid, mouth-breather, max vaxxed nigger-cattle.
>>524547678Oof, before 2020 thohttps://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/megan-fox/2020/05/14/neurosurgeon-says-face-masks-pose-serious-risk-to-healthy-people-n392431>- Lahme et al.,in 2001, wrote that “surgical face masks worn by patients during regional anaesthesia, did not reduce the concentration of airborne bacteria over the operation field in our study. Thus they are dispensable>https://europepmc.org/article/med/11760479>-Figueiredo et al. in 2001, reported that in five years of doing peritoneal dialysis without masks, rates of peritonitis in their unit were no different than rates in hospitals where masks were worn>http://www.advancesinpd.com/adv01/21Figueiredo.htm>-Bahli did a systematic literature review in 2009 and found that “no significant difference in the incidence ofpostoperative wound infection was observed between masks groups and groups operated with no masks>https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/751a/cd427c20c8dc7d1fbc1b45eead104286f481.pdf
>>524547959>- Bahli in Sweden, recognizing the lack of evidence supporting the use of masks, ceased requiring them in 2010 for anesthesiologists and other non-scrubbed personnel in the operating room. “Our decision to no longer require routine surgical masks for personnel not scrubbed for surgery is a departure from common practice. But the evidence to support this practice does not exist,” wrote Dr. Eva Sellden.>https://pubs.asahq.org/anesthesiology/article/113/6/1447/9572/Is-Routine-Use-of-a-Face-Mask-Necessary-in-the>- Surgeons at the Karolinska Institutein 2010, reported on obstetric, gynecological, general, orthopaedic, breast and urological surgeries performed on 827 patients. All non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries, and none of the non-scrubbed staff wore masks in half the surgeries. Surgical site infections occurred in 11.5% of the Mask group, and in only 9.0% of the No Mask group.>https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.05200.x>- Lopp & Edwards reviewed the surgical literature in 2014 and found “no statistically significant difference in infection rates between the masked and unmasked group in any of the trials.>https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD002929.pub2/full>in a 2014 review based on four studies and 6,006 patients, wrote that “none of the four studies found a difference in the number of post-operative infections whether you used a surgical mask or not.>https://europepmc.org/article/med/25294675>Salassa and Swiontkowski, in 2014, investigated the necessity of scrubs, masks and head coverings in the operating room and concluded that “there is no evidence that these measures reduce the prevalence of surgical site infection
>>524548003>https://journals.lww.com/jbjsjournal/Abstract/2014/09030/Surgical_Attire_and_the_Operating_Room__Role_in.11.aspx>Da Zhou et al., reviewing the literature in 2015, concluded that “there is a lack of substantial evidence to support claims that facemasks protect either patient or surgeon from infectious contamination>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0141076815583167>L Brosseau, M Sietsema. Commentary: Masks for all for Covid-19 not based on sound data. U Minn Ctr Inf Dis Res Pol. 2020 Apr 1.\>https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/commentary-masks-all-covid-19-not-based-sound-data> N Leung, D Chu, et al. Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks Nature Research. 2020 Mar 7. 26,676-680 (2020).>https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-16836/v1> S Rengasamy, B Eimer, et al. Simple respiratory protection – evaluation of the filtration performance of cloth masks and common fabric materials against 20-1000 nm size particles. Ann Occup Hyg. 2010 Oct; 54(7): 789-798.>https://academic.oup.com/annweh/article/54/7/789/202744
>>524547959Why can you only post like 10 lines now? This site is for tik tok brains now, sad times. You can let this thread slide under all your bait threads now Jeets and Jews.
>>524547959I was specifically referring to masks and the covid-19 virus particles. That research was completed and published in 2020, and it was like mid-2020, not late. We KNEW by June/July that masks did fucking nothing. We also knew by then it was approximately as deadly as the common cold (it is a common cold virus) and there was no need for any kind of hysteria. The media dragged it out and created a panic, on purpose, to interfere with the election.
>>524547425japan didnt let jewish doctors and shitskin nurses euthanize its elderly.
