>>524548528> retarded non sensical scenario to advance jew D&C narrativesPiss off, kike rat!
Non-Christian white easy
>>524548528go home mahmoud
>>524548578> meme flag> opinion discarded
>>524548528ETHNOSTATE ADMITTANCE:People allowed in the European ethnostate: hard working Europeans, ugly europeans, brown eyed Europeans, blue eyed Europeans, disabled europeans, European doctors, European scientists, European billionaires, fat Europeans, dumb Europeans, smart Europeans, beautiful europeans, disfigured Europeans, criminal Europeans, good Europeans, evil Europeans, fat Europeans, Europeans.You know who's not allowed in the ethnostate?hard working Jews, ugly Jews, brown eyed Jews, blue eyed Jews, disabled Jews, Jewish doctors, Jewish scientists, Jewish billionaires, fat Jews, Jewish doctors, dumb Jews, smart Jews, beautiful Jews, disfigured Jews, criminal Jews, good Jews, evil Jews, Jewshard working Africans, ugly Africans, brown eyed Africans, blue eyed Africans, disabled Africans, african doctors, african scientists, african billionaires, fat Africans, african doctors, dumb Africans, smart Africans, beautiful Africans, disfigured Africans, criminal Africans, good Africans, evil Africans, Africanshard working chinks, ugly chinks, brown eyed Chinks, blue eyed Chinks, disabled chinks, chink doctors, chink scientists, chink billionaires, fat chinks, chink doctors, dumb chinks, smart chinks, beautiful chinks, disfigured chinks, criminal chinks, good chinks, evil chinks, chinkshard working arabs, ugly arabs, brown eyed arabs, blue eyed arabs, disabled arabs, colored doctors, colored scientists, colored billionaires, fat arabs, colored doctors, dumb arabs, smart arabs, beautiful arabs, disfigured arabs, criminal arabs, good arabs, evil arabs, arabshard working coloreds, ugly coloreds, brown eyed coloreds, blue eyed coloreds, disabled coloreds, colored doctors, colored scientists, colored billionaires, fat coloreds, colored doctors, dumb coloreds, smart coloreds, beautiful coloreds, disfigured coloreds, criminal coloreds, good coloreds, evil coloreds, coloredsjust get out.
>>524548927I am home, Amerimutt.
>>524549153Based Finnish
>>524548528Test
> 4 posts by this IDSurprisingBut yea obviously non-christian white Europe
>>524548528>Non-Christian white EuropeThat's peak Europe.
>>524549164>i am home amerimutt no, youre not. go home.
>>524548528>didn't capitalize Whitekys shlomo
>>524548528Do you see WW2 as a religious war or a political race war? It’s relevant to your question
>>524548528youre being replaced by jeets.Americans came from Europe and America was just fine as White and Christian.
>>524548528i would choose white communism over nonwhite natsoc
>>524548528GERMANIC FOURTH REICH EUROPE
>>524550249Political race war.
>>524548528Neither are a possibility. Its like asking if you prefer dry water or cold heat.
>>524548578Christianity is the OG kike D&C tactic
>>524550739That’s what everyone thinks, but it’s incorrect. I can post stuff, if you’re interested, to prove it’s a religious war as opposed to a global race war.
On the origin of the war and the church:>The dominant misunderstanding of the Second World War, and especially of Nazi Germany, lies in the insistence on framing it as a purely political, economic, or racial conflict. At its core, it as a war against what is defined as “the church,” not as a building or a denomination, but as organized religion in all its forms. The church being any system that invokes the divine in order to extract obedience, dissolve accountability, and override human conscience.>The church functions as a parallel sovereign within states. It presents itself as morally superior, transnational, and timeless, while operating as an internal entity that undermines state authority. It reshapes law, morality, and loyalty by appealing to something divine and therefore unquestionable. Once something is declared divine, resistance collapses, because opposing it becomes heresy rather than judgment. In this way, organized religion represents the greatest danger to human consciousness; it removes responsibility from the individual and relocates it in an abstract, untouchable authority.>Hitler’s system represented a prototype for a state without this kind of church. I am not claiming it was perfect, moral, or without flaws. I believe it deliberately eliminated organized religion as a rival authority and replaced it with myth, legend, pagan symbolism, and national destiny. This was not accidental or malicious. It was an attempt to restore what I see as an ancestral Germanic order, one rooted in mythos and cultural identity rather than centralized dogma. Christianity, in my view, was never indigenous to Germanic culture; it was imported, foreign, and incompatible, originating in desert civilizations and migrating north by attaching itself to emerging states in order to siphon power.
>>524550800It is possible, Jews are just in the way. Whites are making up a smaller percentage of Europe's population and they're less religious now than the past 1500 years.
On Germanic tradition, paganism and Jews:>This replacement did not represent a new oppression but rather a reset. Pagan traditions did not rely on priestly intermediaries who monopolized morality. They were cultural, symbolic, and collective rather than institutional and absolutist. In this sense, Nazi Germany sought to free the conscience of the people from religious structures that allowed individuals to evade accountability by hiding behind divine forgiveness, priestly absolution, or moral outsourcing.>Organized religion replaces legality with absolution. Crime becomes sin, consequence becomes confession, and accountability dissolves into forgiveness administered by intermediaries. This allows individuals to escape responsibility not through law, but through ritual. By dismantling clerical mediation, the system I am describing sought to force responsibility back onto the individual and the collective, removing the escape hatch that religion provides.>The targeting of Jews fits into this broader structural conflict. Not in a simplistic or purely racial sense, but because Judaism, as a system, resembles what I define as a church. It has elders, interpreters, teachers, and an internally coherent moral-legal framework rooted in divine authority. It functions as a people without a state operating within states, which mirrors exactly how churches behave; transnational, internally loyal, and legally distinct. This resemblance is not incidental. It reflects a deeper opposition between homogenous nation-states and systems that transcend borders while claiming moral supremacy.
>>524551091Its not. Europe can either be brown and islamic or white and christian. Those are its only options.
>>524550800The more religious - the more brown and the lower IQ.
How religion subverts nations:>The concept of a transnational moral authority is inherently destabilizing. When morality and law are allowed to exist outside blood, land, and shared identity, a nation becomes vulnerable. Its people no longer prioritize their own group, culture, or survival, but instead submit to external arbiters of right and wrong. While those arbiters may sometimes offer valuable insights, there is no guarantee they will act in the host nation’s interest. This creates an opening for corruption, manipulation, cultural erosion, and eventual collapse.>Confining morality and law to blood and soil strengthens internal cohesion. It forces a people to act primarily in their own collective interest, to protect their identity, and to maintain sovereignty over their legal and moral systems. I acknowledge that this model introduces risks, including dogmatism, suppression of individualism, or racial superiority. However, I believe that from a strictly pragmatic and state-survival perspective, such a system is more resilient than one governed by transnational religious authorities.>When morality is monopolized by an organized religious structure, whoever controls that structure effectively controls the population and the state. This is more dangerous than any myth-based or culturally grounded system because it claims divine inevitability and suppresses dissent entirely. In contrast, myth, legend, and national symbolism do not claim universal moral jurisdiction. They bind a people inward rather than subordinating them to an external, eternal authority.
>>524551204So europe was brown and low iq when it ruled the world? Must be some of that BBC revisionist history.
>>524548528why not both?
>>524548528Christians are my brothers. If you really want to exlude yourself, so be it. I’m not siding with anyone who is my enemy. I will help you along the way but I won’t trade places. That is not what turning the other cheek means. You cannot demand of me loyalty over the Body. You don’t understand that I am a zealot and you are not. You larp online, my spiritual beliefs go with me everywhere I walk and never leave my mind. They compel me while you pontificate about race. I’m about my family. My family belong to God.
Blood vs Religion >It is incorrect to frame the Nazi model as merely exchanging one form of oppression for another. In my view, the church is not just another power structure but one that is fundamentally incompatible with Germanic culture. Pagan belief systems were never centralized, priest-dominated, or dogmatic in the way organized religions are. They were decentralized, symbolic, and culturally embedded rather than institutionally enforced. For that reason, I do not see the Nazi rejection of organized religion as a lateral shift in domination, but as an attempted restoration of an older cultural order that preceded foreign religious imposition.>What distinguishes Germanic pagan traditions is not simply their mythology, but their lack of centralized authority. There was no universal priesthood, no singular interpretive body, and no claim to absolute moral jurisdiction over all people. Myth functioned as narrative and identity, not as an instrument of legal or moral coercion. This decentralization, in my opinion, made such systems fundamentally different from organized religions that consolidate interpretive power and demand submission.>These traditions were not universalist or abstract. They were kin-based, land-bound, and pre-state. Morality was inseparable from lineage, territory, and obligation to one’s own people. There was no ambition to govern humanity, only to preserve the integrity of the group. This is fundamentally incompatible with systems that claim universal moral jurisdiction over all peoples.
>>524548528And if I chose neither out of spite?
>>524551341Your “blood” wore out while my “religion” has lasted 2000 years. My God’s blood washes away sin. Your blood cries out from the soil to my God.
The reality of organized religion and the subversion of civilization:>Organized Christianity, and organized religion more broadly, follows a recurring civilizational pattern. It migrates across regions and cultures, attaches itself to emerging states, adapts its outward form to local customs, and then gradually extracts sovereignty by positioning itself as the ultimate moral authority. This is not unique to Germany, but a structural mechanism that has repeated across history, weakening host states by creating a competing center of legitimacy that transcends borders and generations.>Organized Christianity, and organized religion, operate as a parasitic civilizational structure. It does not belong to any land or people, yet it embeds itself wherever power exists. It migrates across civilizations, reshaping its appearance to match the host culture while hollowing it out from within. It latches onto states, monarchies, and empires, siphoning legitimacy, authority, and obedience until the state no longer governs itself, but governs on behalf of an invisible moral sovereign.>Universal morality, when imposed through transnational religious systems, is not a moral advancement but a strategic vulnerability. It allows foreign values, interests, and agendas to enter a population under the guise of righteousness. Ideas can be injected slowly, invisibly, and with moral immunity. Culture can be eroded from within without armies, without invasion, without resistance, because opposition is reframed as immoral or sinful. In my opinion, this is one of the most effective tools ever devised for weakening nations; convincing a people to turn against their own identity, instincts, and state in the name of a higher, external moral authority.
>>524551188I refuse to worship a god of slavery, genital mutilation and compound interest, even if said god is European. If anything, our God is Deus Pater, Woden, Dagda etc. Not Yahweh.
>>524551459No one expects you to convert ranjeet. You're just around to make liberals feel good about helping the lesser races of the earth.
>>524548528the religion could be anything, i just want white europe
How the church undermines a state:>This vulnerability is not accidental. Transnational moral systems can be weaponized deliberately. Guilt becomes asymmetrical, loyalty is reframed as immorality, and self-defense is recast as sin. A people can be disarmed psychologically long before they are conquered physically. This is not chaos; it is strategy. A demiurgic strategy.>When I draw structural parallels between Jews and church systems, I am not claiming identity, equivalence, or moral judgment. I am describing what I see as a functional resemblance: a transnational identity, internally governed moral-legal traditions, and continuity independent of host states. In my opinion, it is this structural similarity, not race or ethnicity, that placed such systems in opposition to homogenous nation-state models seeking absolute sovereignty.>The true danger of what I call “the church” is not ritual, belief, or spirituality, but the invocation of divine finality. The moment a system claims its morality is divinely sanctioned and therefore unquestionable, all resistance collapses. Human conscience is surrendered, not because people are evil, but because dissent becomes rebellion against the absolute. This is the most dangerous mechanism ever introduced into human society, because it removes accountability entirely while appearing righteous.
>>524551459>NOOO NOT THE HECKIN SLAVERY, MISOGYONY, AND RACISMS
This part answers your question OP >>524548528Churchill’s Christianity:>Regarding Winston Churchill’s June 1940 speech commonly known as “This was their finest hour.” This was delivered at a moment when Britain stood alone against Nazi Germany, after the fall of France. It is often remembered as a rallying speech, but I believe its deeper function was to frame the war not merely as military resistance, but as a civilizational and moral apocalypse.>In the speech, Churchill states that “upon this battle depends the survival of Christian civilization.” I believe this phrasing is deliberate and revealing. He does not say the survival of Britain alone, nor democracy, nor law, nor Europe in neutral terms. He chooses “Christian civilization” as the core object under threat. For readers unfamiliar with the context, this is not a throwaway phrase. It is a signal that the war is being framed as an existential struggle over moral authority, cultural legitimacy, and historical continuity, with Christianity positioned as the civilizational backbone that must be preserved at all costs.>Immediately after invoking Christian civilization, Churchill links it to “the long continuity of our institutions and our Empire.” I believe this connection exposes what is actually being defended. Christianity here is not purely theological; it functions as the moral scaffolding of an imperial order, a legitimizing tradition that binds law, authority, and obedience together. In my opinion, Churchill is not speaking as a neutral statesman, but as a custodian of an inherited moral regime that depends on organized religion for its authority.
Continuation of Churchill’s speech:>Later in the speech, Churchill warns that defeat would plunge the world into “a new Dark Age, made more sinister and perhaps more prolonged by the lights of perverted science.” To readers unfamiliar with the language of the time, this is a striking phrase. He is not condemning ignorance or backwardness. He is condemning modernity without religious restraint. I believe this is crucial. The fear being expressed is not technological failure, but technological success without clerical moral arbitration. Science is not rejected; it is condemned when it is no longer subordinated to the moral authority of the existing order.>I believe the term “Dark Age” is being weaponized rhetorically. Historically, the Dark Ages are associated with the collapse of Roman authority and the rise of the church as the primary moral and institutional power in Europe. In my view, Churchill’s warning reverses this history. He frames a future without the church’s moral dominance as darkness, even if it is technologically advanced. This reveals, to me, that what is feared is not chaos or barbarism, but a world in which humanity governs itself without divine intermediaries.>Churchill is constructing a narrative in which Britain stands as the last defender of a sacred moral order, and Germany is cast not merely as an aggressor, but as a corrupter of civilization itself. This framing transforms political conflict into moral absolutism, where compromise becomes impossible and existential language becomes necessary.>Churchill was not resisting a foreign power. He was resisting a future in which organized religion might lose its monopoly over morality, law, and legitimacy. The speech’s apocalyptic tone and its emphasis on Christian civilization all point to a deeper struggle over who gets to define right and wrong in the modern world.
>>524548528Why not a Christian White Europe like how it was for many many centuries, why does it have to be one or the other? Your subversive gay game is just that subversive and gay which makes you subversive and gay as well.
>>524551391Uncle your religion is another form of governing. You do not claim any divinity. To say you do is heresy of the highest order. No Jesus, no Mohammad, no Moses. Your loyalty must be to your blood and land; through that you serve god, nothing else.
>>524551900Because there is no such thing as Christian white Europe. When you say Christian, or Muslim, or Jewish, you remove any racial rights and borders.
>>524551650You are correct. Here's another quote from Churchill "Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in THE STRONG ARMS OF SCIENCE, THE SCIENCE AGAINST WHICH IT HAD VAINLY STRUGGLED, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome." - The River War, Volume II, Pg 248-50
>>524551954That's bullshit and you know it. In the past with Christians, Muslims, and even Jews there were clear racial seperations and borders seperating them all whether it be based on race or nationality.
>>524551650Christians caused the Umayyad Caliphate and the fall of Constantinople, leading to Ottoman takeover, which only ended in the 20th century with British and American artillery - weapons of enlightenment-European science, developed BY WAR, not by Christian dogma.
>>524548528Herro Chang
>>524552080Can you please point exactly where did those states exist in history? Because if you’re reffering to Islam, every single Islamic empire was a globohomo ethnic mix of every eastern race in one spot. Same goes for every Christian state. It’s only when they are pagans or secular do these empires enjoy homogenous societies.
>>524552148Meanwhile in ww1
>>524552185Can you point exactly where these globohomo states existed that you claim in the past for Christianity or even Islam where they had no borders at all seperated by different religious beliefs plus nationality differences? Even with these Christian and muslim nations they had clear defined borders, you are talking about a history that never existed.
>>524552224How do you not see the correlation between the appearance of Jesus and the fall of the Roman republic? Do you think it was by pure chance that during the entire reign of the republic, this Jesus never dared to show up and only when Caesar ended it, did he miraculously show up 60 years later larping as a king.The truth is, the Jesus you worship is a Jewish man propped up by the Jews of the Roman Empire as a bid to form their own puppet emperor. That is exactly why they crucified him, he was leading a rebellion against the state. There is absolutely nothing divine about him.
>they care are currently on path for non-Christian AND non-white EuropeGRIM
>>524552224And do you think WW1 was anything but a Jew-led destruction of whites, of monarchy and of German sovereignty? Do you think it's justified? If so, you're kinda proving the point of the OP that Christians are anti-white, don't you think?
>>524552309Man Google the demographic of the Abbasid state ffs. Then come tell me how the most racist people on earth (Arabs) were willing to accept being ruled by Persians, who are their arch nemesis by blood and ideology. It’s only through the invention of Islam did these empires manage to form. The Ummayid state collapsed so fast because it tried to replicate a prototype of the Roman Empire, where religion was a culture to be celebrated amongst the homogenous society. Abbasids brought them down in an instant and restored the rule of the Islamic church as law. Creating an empire with borders than spanned half the earth, and included every race imaginable, all mixing and undermining the host nation for their own gain. Similar to how modern Christian nations are degrading.
>>524552362No I dont, because I know roman history and you're a low IQ sandnigger who clearly doesn't.>>524552397I think ww1 was fought by very religious societies. Funfact science is a christian invention.
>>524552593Julius Caesar toppled the Roman republic around 46 BC, Jesus appeared around 27 CE.Roman republic lasted from around 509 BC, till its collapse.And you’re telling me Jesus never appeared during it and only when kings became the standard he does? And coincidently happens to be Jewish?
>>524552749fwiw, Osiris is basically the Jesus figure with similar stories, dating back to around 3000 BC/ Not to mention Mithra also.
>>524552749Caesar Augustus wasn't a king and yes. Unlike your pedophile prophet the message that the true God Jesus Christ came to spread was not of of earthy riches and power like some base warlord. As for the republic it had been dying for almost 200 years.>God is a jewI expect that kind of hubris from a jew but from a muzzie its kind of pathetic. Have some dignity ffs.
>>524552906How retarded are you. You are worshipping a Jewish man trying to grab power for himself and you call him God? Despite his entire story having no cohesion, constantly contradicts the historical events, and is evidently disastrous to nations, you continue to repeat the church mantra. Your race is actively dying, and you cling to an abstract idol built by Jews to undermine host nations. What do you call this level of ignorance.
>>524552906>Not of earthly riches he says, while the church sent the European continent into a dark age from how fucking subhuman they were with their desire for earthly pleasures.You can keep flinging shit at the pedophile prophet of Islam all you want, it won’t change your destiny or the reality that your race WILL die under Christianity.
>>524552593"science is a Christian invention" > muh Thomas Aquinas!Tell that to Aristotle, Archimedes, Auguste Comte, David Hume, Thomas Paine, Ben Franklin etc, the latter of whom contributed significantly to Empiricism and the former, whom laid the ACTUAL foundations of scientific inquiry...fuck those secularists! It's all thanks to Tommy!
>>524553007>How dare you mock the pedophile bandit false prophet!lol>>524553123My race will always rule over yours. Thats why God blesses my people and curses yours.
>>524553432Yes anon science is a christian invention and doesn't exist outside of christian civilization. You cant have science ins a world where theres no objective reality which is the basis of every non christian worldview on earth, including the progressive troonism that you worship. You confuse tinkering with science. Also Aristotle wasn't a scientist.
>>524553433>My race will rule over yours>Worships a sandnigger jew I can’t tell who’s worse you or islamists worshipping an Irani idol
>>524553432All these people you cited drink from the fountain of Greek Philosophy, which in turn drink from Babylonian and Egyptian scientific inquiry (the pythagorean theorem was actually a babylonian Discovery, not greek).The greeks were plagiarists of middle-easterners.
>>524553528Literally everything you just said is factually incorrect.
>>524553528Are you even white? Your negligence of race in every reply while clinging to Christian identity and claiming your knowledge of Rome tells me you are a Mexican living in America or a hybrid mutt. Why do you speak on behalf of whites while being brown?
>>524553821Wrong. Theres a reason christian are the only people that have had science and that science collapses in the science the money gaythiests get a hold of it. When and ideology can't even tell male from female because nothing is real and everything is a feeling then its not gonna produce much objective science.
>>524548528Lmao define Christianity? Theres a lot of denominations and even an atheist society can still live by the same morals as Christianity but just without god
>>524548528>everyone going to hell but white>everyone creating hell on earth but not going to hellHorrible choices.
>>524553821This is the real Europe without Christianity, you faggot ass jeet.
>>524553950Yes I'm the only white itt. You seem to think the hysterical cope of a shitskin threatens me in any way. I see your novellas of cope and laugh as the silly rambling or a slave race. Your White Gods have nothing to prove to you.
>>524554066Thoughts on the ICE raids trump has been promoting across the USA?
>>524548528>Non-Christian white EuropeUSSR>non-white Christian Europe1950s USANow choose.
>>524554247Based. Especially when they deport mudshits.
>>524550739The Saxons were conquered and relocated to other regions for raiding the Franks every time Charlemagne wanted to crusade Al Andalus.
>>524554352Original transcript of Himmler's May 5th, 1944 speech:"We are NOT Christians - THAT IS OVER, but there has never been one among us who did not believe in a God." _____________________Cited:Bundesarchiv: NS 19/4013 Rede vor Generalen auf der Ordensburg Sonthofen 5. Mai 1944 p.179>Himmler explains in a document to Meinoud Rost van Tonningen that the churches and its followers constantly try to harm the National Socialist movement.__________________________The Reichsführer-ᛋᛋ Field Command PostHH 24/43.5. March 1943.“It does not surprise me in the slightest that the churches would proclaim such things from the pulpits. I KNOW THAT THE CHURCH IS OUR ENEMY, and I also know that the stupidity of many individuals who still follow the Church is considerable. Likewise, I fully expect the Church to harm us wherever it can, both as a collective body and through many individuals. But since I know this, I do not get upset by every individual case. In fact, I would even be surprised if they did not do so. I only intervene in cases where the damage caused by our enemies, whether overt or covert, would be too great. In many other cases, I do not even think about taking action or letting it upset me."— Heinrich HimmlerKeep telling yourself the church is your ally and god.
>>524554568>Cope speech in the last days of a losing war.I dont care about that. The nazis were retards.
>>524554353Widukind retreated to Denmark during the Saxons wars to inform his Norse brothers of Charlecunt's Jewish takeover, which lead to 300 years of resistance called the Viking Age. The Vikings were defeated at Stamford bridge by King "Godwin", only for said King to be defeated by the Normans less than 3 weeks later at the Battle of Hastings. This lead to the influx of thousands of Jews into England who proceeded to trailblaze medieval religious torture over so called "heresy" and "witchcraft", and plundered the country with usury. Our women - who represent the future of our race - were hunted, burned and tortured over bullshit and so were our men.
>>524554966The vikings sold white slaves to muslims and jews. What kind of cope is this? Also the "vikings" were christian for centuries by the time of Stamford bridge.
>>524555149Yes, according to Christian/Jewish "historians", i.e. those who won in the end. Of course they're going to demonize them.
