Do artists deserve to be replaced by AI?
they absolutely dotheres no reason some retard doing deviantart should be paid the price of a lawyer
I think artists can sell art to whoever wants to pay them for jt
>>524552337if someone will pay then that's the price it's worth
ARTISTS are unimaginably empowered by AI.Little craft faggots will be destroyed and I will facilitate their mass suicide with genocidal aplomb.
>>524552337If some retard is ready to pay 220€/h an hour for a completely worthless and replaceable faggot? Go for it. Good for him. Retards deserve to be scammed.
>>524552337Yes fuck commies
>>524552337>Commercial illustration work>Charging far less than any other area of commercial work including marketingThis is the very best ragebait you could come up with?
>>524552337I'm an artist that went to art school and Yes, they absolutely do. They deserve it for making my life so hard during all the collaborations I had to do with other artist. A lot of them are narcissistic assholes and terrible people. Even the collaboration I'm working on now my back hurts from carrying the entire project. The worst are the rich kids that went to art school with no skills, talent or creativity. They either trace or copy something to give the illusion of having skill or do some random bullshit and use words to justify it and sway the teachers. Anyway most people claiming to be artists aren't artist but actually artisans because they work on a product and not actual art.
>>524554060At those rates, the illustrations better come with multiple blowjobs.
>>524552337that'll be $4000 dollars, goyim
>>524554060I mean... if you compare end project to end project, per company to company, sure. But we are talk7ng about paying a furry fetish artist any amount above 250 USD per piece is deranged.Commissions should, at most, go by 100 USD, and only if the artist is good
>>524552337Did you make that image because you spelt commissions wrong idiot
