I can prove Trump redacted the names of 10 powerful pedophiles. Due to the government designation of "10 co-conspirators", these names can be used to concretely prove Trump protected the pedophiles.Pic related references 10 people named as "co-conspirators" by the United States, but whose names were redacted in the files.>https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00037362.pdfQuery "co-conspirator". Here are a few examples:>https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1256-04.pdf>Are you aware that [redacted] was a co-conspirator, named as a co-conspirator in the case involving Jeffrey Epstein?>[redacted] was one of the co-conspirators, physically, in the nonconstitution agreement, is that correct?>Do you know, you mentioned earlier today that [redacted] was one of the listed co-conspirators.>How did you come to learn that [redacted] was covered by the nonprosecution agreement?2 more documents where co-conspirators are mentioned, but the names are redacted.>https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00020105.pdf>https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00021941.pdfHere is a document in which every defendant's name has been redacted, except for Jeffrey Epstein and 2 companies which he owned (Hyperion and JEGE).>https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00016013.pdfHere is a document which references apparently unreleased photos of co-conspirators. Even potentially identifying filenames were redacted.>https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00037630.pdfHere documents make reference to "co-conspirator statements", which do not appear in the files, even in redacted form.>https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00025062.pdf>https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00010154.pdf>https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00029590.pdf
In my opinion, for the protection of powerful, and prolific, pedophiles, the president should be impeached
