[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1749949503377.png (762 KB, 1228x1214)
762 KB
762 KB PNG
How long would it take Germany to make a nuclear weapon if they had the restrictions taken away?
>>
>>524614674
Enriching uranium or plutonium is the only part that would slow them down. But they could likely have a nuke within months if they did it all on their own.
>>
>>524614674
Half a year maybe?
>>
>>524614801
the paperwork would be the biggest hurdle
>>
>>524614674
It takes Germany 15 years to build a civilian airport (Berlin Brandenburg). Now do the math!
>>
File: 1591362634607.webm (1.1 MB, 600x600)
1.1 MB
1.1 MB WEBM
>>524614674
>Be Germany
>Basically kikes
>Do not want nuclear power
>Probably do not have any reactors for making nuclear materials.
>Do not have any nuclear materials.
>Cannot process nuclear materials.
>Do not want to spend the hundreds of billions perhaps trillion euros on any of those.
>Derrr probability 0.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001
KYS retarded nigger
>>
>>524614834
The paperwork alone would take two years or more. Courts would be bombarded with appeals. In Germany every local resident and his dog must be asked for approval and then you have the environmental activists and the animal rights activist and...
>>
>>524614674
The hardest part would be making the plutonium which you get from a nuclear reactor and Germany has now not got any of those.
>>
>>524614674
Average kraut with a backyard shed and a full set of Wera or Wiha hand tools? Probably a weekend project.
>>
>>524614674
Germany's first nuclear weapons (4 total) were made in 1940s under programs directed by Heisenberg . They awaited for a missile system to deploy the nukes as they didn't have an aircraft large enough. Germany tested 1 bomb
The other three were captured by General Patton and 1 was given to the Soviet Spy Oppenheimer to test.
The last two were dropped by the Freemason Truman on the two largest Catholic cities in Japan, a war crime.
The
>>
>>524614674
15 years.
Unless you count our politicians as restrictions, which of course they are, then it will take 8 or so.
Eliminate environmental and safety concerns too? 4 years.
>>
Now if we were to rely on others to do most of the work, like reprocessing it could probably be done in two.
Building the necessary reactors and reprocessing infrastructure in itself would take 3 years at minimum, and only then can the uranium and plutonium be produced in quantity, 6 months at least, then the refinement and construction.
So 4 years is a pretty tight schedule.
Improvisation isn't the German way, like building shabby unsafe reactors and factories that will have an accident once a year at minimum, like in the Manhattan Project.
>>
>>524614834
Nah, when they really want it done, they can sort out any paperwork in about four-and-a-half hour.
Trust me, we know this around here.
>>
>>524614674
They are considered a threshold state which means less than six months.
The US has nukes stored in Germany and Germany could easily take them, like physically pick them up with 12 guys and arm them.
>>
>>524620855
You think we just have the plutonium laying around? That's not legal.
We also have no nuclear power plants and consequently no fuel to speak of, not least because we also have no reprocessing plant. France does this.
Will France give us plutonium? Not lightly.
Also no uranium enrichment facilities. Again we would have to ask France.
Of course there's plenty of surplus enriched uranium and plutonium laying around, but only in nuclear weapons states, and the non-proliferation treaty makes that difficult to export.
If you import that shit you might as well simply buy a warhead.
>>
>>524621442
>We also have no nuclear power plants and consequently no fuel to speak of, not least because we also have no reprocessing plant. France does this.
>Will France give us plutonium? Not lightly.
Kek, we are litterally producing the fuel rods for french nuclear plants.
>>
>>524614674
2 years
>>
File: nuke hoax books.jpg (173 KB, 1040x756)
173 KB
173 KB JPG
After discovering nuclear fission for energy in 1938, Germans understand that 'nuclear bombs' do not exist at all.

In 1932 Jewish physicist Leó Szilárd got excited reading that 1914 H G Wells novel on 'atomic bombs', and Szilárd began selling the idea to fellow Jewish scientists, finally convincing fellow Jew Albert Einstein to join him in promoting the 'nuclear bomb' story to FDR and the US government, right after Germans in Berlin discovered nuclear fission energy for power plants in late 1938.

Szilárd was too foreign, Einstein too aged & lacking in social skills, so a 3rd Jew, the young, social & energetic J. Robert Oppenheimer, with his Communist wife and brother, was selected to lead the theatrical enactment of the 'nuclear bomb' hoax in the Jewish & Freemason Manhattan project.

Everyone needs to know:
- Hiroshima & Nagasaki are now totally proven to have been chemically firebombed like Tokyo or Dresden (a 66-plane fleet of chemical firebombers hit Hiroshima, not a 'lone B-29 flying solo')
- Mushroom clouds are standard in chemical blasts, you see them all the time as Chinese factories explode etc
- Those old 'nuke blast' videos are clearly doctored

It was the ideal 'terror hoax', and the fact that Hiroshima did not suffer anything new, was already in USA's then-famous Reader's Digest magazine in 1946. Stalin's Russia, Oppenheimer's commie friends, were allowed to join the scam in 1949, becoming the 'Best Enemy Money Can Buy' with the fake 'Cold War' (Antony Sutton). Then UK, France, China, Israel ...

Crisp summary
https://www.henrymakow.com/2020/07/nuclear-bombs-do-not-exist.html
free books online
'Death Object: Exploding the Nuclear Weapons Hoax', by Akio Nakatani
https://archive.org/details/8d-0de-2
'Hiroshima Revisited: Evidence that Napalm & Mustard Gas Helped Fake Atomic Bombings', by Michael Palmer
https://mpalmer.heresy.is/webnotes/HR/download/hiroshima-revisited.pdf
>>
>>524621537
Producing those doesn't necessarily involve weapons grade material though, although MOX fuel has plutonium in it, and using low-enriched uranium is also possible.
Still that's not our plutonium we put in there (if we make MOX fuel at all, which I have some doubts about).
If so then certainly it shouldn't be too hard to steal some. Causing a nuclear explosion with plutonium is very easy. We could create a real shitty bomb in a day.
>>
>>524621654
That's like saying fire is totally real but you can't set a house on fire, only build stoves.
>>
File: IMG_6431.gif (1.34 MB, 250x355)
1.34 MB
1.34 MB GIF
>>524614674

> Germany
> restrictions taken away

The minutes it took to call the Kremlin.

Modern Europe is based on keeping German face in the mud
>>
>>524614674
Germany is too gay, they'll all be on vacation for months



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.