[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: images.jpg (9 KB, 225x225)
9 KB
9 KB JPG
>if ur against bombing Maduro ur brown
>We're protecting America from narco terrorism
>Libs are so mad lol
>If u aint with us ur with the terrorists

Magacult spends 10 years crying about 'neocons', 'regime change wars' only to start repeating Dubya era propaganda the moment Epstein's bestie starts his own regime change war. Never want to hear another of you retards whining about John Bolton ever again.
>>
File: 1744102744455329.jpg (78 KB, 673x771)
78 KB
78 KB JPG
>>524615971
No one cares about non-whites getting bombed.
>>
File: lv_0_20251226100838.jpg (570 KB, 1080x1274)
570 KB
570 KB JPG
>>
>>524615971
Bush was right. You aren't ready for the Bushpill.
>>
>>524615971
>the moment Epstein's bestie starts his own regime change war.
We’re not at war yet though.
Why is every liberal talking point about something that either happened way in the past or something that might happen in the future?
>>
No shit
>>
>>524615971
I unironically supported the Iraqi / Afghanistan wars from a western imperialist standpoint.
We're eventually going to be forced into conflict with China and possibly Russia.
That area has 2 things that we need desperately. Land and oil.
Too bad that we're too much of a fuckup to secure both.
>>
>>524616302
If you're going to do it then it needs to be done in an actual imperialist way rather than just leaving both countries a few years later. Iraq ended up with a huge amount of Iranian influence in its parliament and taking out Saddam was a huge win for the Iranians.
Afghanistan could have had the 3000 troops that remained there by the last years of the conflict stationed there forever and it would have been stable because the Taliban were stuck in the hills from that, but again, the US fucked off so it was all a waste.
>>
>>524616423
Afghanistan is unironically more stable and safe now under the Taliban than they were under Bush and Obamas puppet government.
These people are literally fine when they’re not constantly forced to defend themselves.
>advance along with the rest of the world
>be well respected worldwide for your mathematical discoveries
>get conquered by communists
>fight back and win
>start rebuilding society
>immediately get bombed back to the stone age by the US
>start rebuilding society
>Jews start funding ISIS and sending them against you
Afghanistan is actually too good for the Middle East. They’ve proven that they can be civilized and build themselves up, multiple times over.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.