[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: pepeAnnoyed.jpg (25 KB, 525x384)
25 KB
25 KB JPG
So when Biden gave money to Ukraine, he was a "WAR HAWK!!!" but when we invade, kidnap, and regime change, it's "there's no war?"
>>
>>525100295
Anon anything /pol/ says really means might makes right.
>>
Yeah, it's easy to understand if you're not retarded. OTOH we were paying to shoot missiles at a nuclear power in some never ending war scenario. OTOH, we grabbed a dictator and whisked him away and that's the end of the "war."

I'm sure you know the difference and are just questioning, but to what end? You'll never amount to a hill of beans with this gay shit, OP.
>>
File: smirk.jpg (12 KB, 355x386)
12 KB
12 KB JPG
>>525100295
Winning is good and throwing money at losers is bad. It's that simple OP.
>>
>>525100470
But there was no U.S. war with Russia. In both cases we risked war. Both gambles = no war.
>>
>>525100821
>But there was no U.S. war with Russia.
Could have been.

>In both cases we risked war.
One's a much bigger risk than the other.

It's easy to understand - most people don't want to have a nuclear war with Russia even though that was the plan. I understand that Europe won't be relevant on the world stage again unless Russia and the US nuke each other into dust, but that's no longer the actual plan. You can tell it was the plan too.

Anyway Europe will just have to thrash around with Russia for a while instead.
>>
>>525100295
Congress decides what is a war and what is not.
They have no said this is a war. So it isn't.
Nothing difficult about this kids.
>>
>>525100295
Invade??

Kys
>>
>>525100615
Literally this. Just win and nobody cares except losers (browns)
>>
File: 1736303560010209.png (362 KB, 706x761)
362 KB
362 KB PNG
>>525100295
I see your problem, you are trying to reason the actions of a real estate promoter and reality tv personality with the national interest.
>>
>>525101209
China and Russia are Venezuela's allies. Ukraine is a proxy war. That's about the same risk.
Remember when Hillary wanted a no-fly zone over Syria and we all said "that would cause war with Russia" despite being a proxy state?
>>
>>525100295
>>525101889
I have Groyper fatigue
>>
>>525101929
>China and Russia are Venezuela's allies. Ukraine is a proxy war. That's about the same risk.
Wrong, Ukraine and Russia border each other, that vastly increases the risk. And Ukraine is being used as a launching ground to attack Russia directly.

Sorry chum. Ukraine project's donezo. We're Monroe Doctrine now. Europe is all grown up and out of diapers and ready to take on Russia by themselves finally.
>>
>>525102259
That risk is balanced out by the fact that proxy wars happen all the time - Ukraine was no different. Directly invading one of their allies and killing an Iranian general is way more direct and opens the door for China to invade Taiwan and Russia to do more fuckshit.
>>
File: Fi347aOaEAE0CmH.png (351 KB, 490x598)
351 KB
351 KB PNG
>>525101970
>Groyper

Yes, groy, scan your id to get in the AF event and be sure to say you are a good groy online so we know who you are. Follow the leader.
>>
>>525102476
>That risk is balanced out by the fact that proxy wars happen all the time - Ukraine was no different.
It is though, due to the geographical proximity to Russia. You keep saying this doesn't matter, but it does.

>Directly invading one of their allies and killing an Iranian general is way more direct and opens the door for China to invade Taiwan and Russia to do more fuckshit.
So? Let's face it - the US was never going to save Taiwan. It's the same reason the British gave up Hong Kong. There's no practical way to defend it. We're not doing nuclear war over Ukraine or Taiwan either.

Just relax. Latin America needs more attention. We've learned that.
>>
>>525101224
Did Congress declare war on Russia?

>>525101282
Naw, Delta Force was there on a student visa

>>525102598
>It is though, due to the geographical proximity to Russia. You keep saying this doesn't matter, but it does.
Syria doesn't border Russia. When Hillary wanted a no-fly zone, everybody called her a war hawk who would start shit with Russia. Seems like indirectly fucking with Russia/China is only okay when Trump does it.
>>
>>525102982
>Did Congress declare war on Russia?
Look it up, faggot.
>>
>>525104905
I'm being rhetorical, fucktard. They didn't, so it makes no sense to call Biden a warhawk if all you care about is "muh congress"



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.