This is what the US government should have posted today btwImagine including salmon, avocado, and nuts as shit people should eat every day lol
>>525336349you know root vegetables are carbs right?
>>525336349PEATERS are in control. JERF protocol is merely an intermediate step. Trust the plan.
>>525337012Yes, but they are mostly starch. Carbs in the picture refers to sugars primarily
>>525337012Starch is a separate macronutrient and shouldn't be lumped into simple sugars seen in carbs, imbecile.
>>525336349kino except for pic rel
>>525337315>>525337426Potatoes have a gi of between 70 to 90, higher than white table sugar. Your body process them exactly the same.
>>525336349How do you feed 300+ million people liver? There's only 1 liver per animal and they're relatively small.
>>525338774Liver would be the most infrequently consumed food according to this chart
>>525338774chicken liver, one each.
>>525336349glad to see fellow peaters, fuck all these PUFAniggers and their inferior mitochondrias
>>525338927Yeah. And still, we don't produce that many bee hives, and if you're constantly siphoning off the honeycomb then the bees suffer for it. Can't grow all those carb/fruits year round, let alone to the capacity, can't fish that much (oceans are already fucked), can't produce that many eggs without ruining the chicken (most eggs today are watery shit due to the factory conditions), can't grow that many vegetables for the total population, etc.
>>525337954yes, they give you energy and make you more insulin sensitive. they should be eaten all the timeand that is an oversimplification as wellhttps://www.drmcdougall.com/education/information/glycemic-index-not-ready-for-prime-time/mcdougall explains this very well. the glycemic index is being misused and misunderstood. >The findings from the GI demonstrate the falsity of the popular notion that the rates of absorption are a matter of “simple carbohydrates” versus “complex carbohydrates.” The gut is not a passive sieve that allows molecules to pass based on their size—rather it is an active membrane with an “intelligence” that purposefully allows selected nutrients to enter at the correct rate and in the correct amount. The large numbers of carbohydrates found in our foods have a wide variety of chemical compositions and physical structures—as a result of complex interactions, they are digested and absorbed by the human small intestine into the body at different rates—giving rise to diverse blood sugar and insulin responses.>...>Many people stake their whole health future on the GI. However, from the practical viewpoint of daily use, GI is too complex and changeable to precisely guide a person to the correct food choices. Different studies find widely varying GI values; for example, sweet corn has been found to have a GI of 37, 46, 48, 59, 60, and 62.1 Cooking and cooling changes the food’s GI. The ripeness of the food increases the GI. Disrupting a food’s dietary fiber by grinding, and also removing the fiber, make carbohydrates more easily absorbed, increasing the GI. Mixing foods together results in a GI of the meal that cannot be predicted from the GI of the individual foods. Therefore, even with great effort you will likely be way off your target GI.your blood sugar is supposed to rise when you eat. your body runs on sugar aka glucose.
>>525339855>your blood sugar is supposed to rise when you eat. your body runs on sugar aka glucose.Yes, I know. I am probably the only person on this board that will agree with you. Every cell in the body is fueled by glucose.
>>525339314>can't grow fruit etc year roundbut you can dry them and can them and and andgrains are carbs and they store for years, even in pre industrial times what are now peruvians used to freeze fry potatoes and got about 90% of their calories from themthe natives here ate mostly corn beans and squash, which also store well through the winter. surprisingly they ate very little meat in comparison to carbs. >can't grow that many vegetables for the total population, etc.https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/the-world-has-a-surplus-of-food-so-why-cant-we-eliminate-hunger/article34709360/>Starvation does not happen because of a shortage of food. And starvation does not happen because there are too many people. There is plenty enough food for all the world's people – in fact, with a little effort, we could double the amount produced. Governments are paying farmers to cut back their harvests, as we have run out of storage space....>The world currently has a third more rice and wheat in storage than it is expected to consume, sell or turn into fuel in 2017. The combined world surplus of wheat, corn, rice and soya recently passed 670 million tonnes, or enough to feed all of China for a year.
>>525336349crazy how many different variations of stupid diets there are
>>525340319i am just making the point that table sugar and potatoes are not even close in the way the body processes themand there is an error in his article, where he says that sugar causes obesity, which is untrue. he even says himself that humans have a weak and inefficient ability to make body fat from carbs. in healthy people carbs are stored in the liver and muscles as glucosehttps://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1394223/?page=1sugar makes you more insulin sensitive as well. this means your body cuts back on insulin production when you eat sugar.
>>525340897>Neither high nor low GI carbohydrates results in excess calorie consumption or weight gain. In fact, a high-carbohydrate diet is crucial in preventing weight gain in those with a tendency for obesity.7,8 Carbohydrate consumption promotes satisfaction of the appetite and higher GI foods do this even better than low GI foods—because the elevation of the blood sugar after eating is one of the key mechanisms in satisfying the appetite and reducing food intake.9 Worldwide, populations of hundreds of millions of people who eat high GI potatoes (Peruvians) and rice (Asians) are trim and active for a lifetime. Compare this worldwide observation to populations of obese people living in the USA, Australia, and Western Europe who feast daily on low GI sugars, fats, meats, and cheeses.>According to a statement by the American Diabetes Association, “…there is little evidence that total carbohydrate is associated with the development of type 2 diabetes. Rather, a stronger association has been observed between total fat and saturated fat and type 2 diabetes.”10 Multiple studies have shown an inverse relationship between the amount of carbohydrate consumed and the development of diabetes.11 Populations of people worldwide who eat diets centered on high glycemic index carbohydrates, like rice for rural Asians, and potatoes for people in Peru, are essentially free of diabetes.13,14
>>525340897Yes and you piss out any excess.
>>525341163my point was that both veg and fruit are considered carbs. imo the veg should be labeled carbs and the fruit should be labeled sugar. Pedantic? Maybe.
>>525341487carbs are a wide ranging category, simple sugar, starches and fibre are all carbs. i think it is more profitable to understand things on a deeper level than to just start drawing lines in the sandvegetables have very low calorie density and don't do much to feed you, but there are vitamins and minerals etc. fruit generally has a much higher calorie density which allows us to actually function. lewis and clark survived on pawpaws quite well when they ran out of food.you can eat carrots, for instance, all day long and never get enough calories. on the other hand, you can eat 3 bellyfulls of oatmeal a day and have energy enough to live on. so while there are carbs in veggies, it is mostly fibre. your gut can use this though, but it's simply not viable to be a saladatarianthis is why for millenia people ate mostly grain with a small amount of veg on the side, and fruit when it was in season or dried. most people in most cases in history, and today in the poorer countries, eat a diet of mostly starch with very little meat. these are the healthiest people in the world btw, with great musculature and dentition. mcdougall breaks veggies down into starchy and non starchy vegetables. so it's ok to make conceptual categories, but to be useful they need to map to the terrain, so to speak. and if you want to nerd out on potatoes, i have a four hour presentation for you. and yes i watched it, pic relatedhttps://youtu.be/v60u4plA1TAhttps://youtu.be/NhGG9ihM4xQ
>>525336349>no leafy greensno wonder every swedish post on this board is sub 90 IQ
