Is he right? Are Christians a bunch of race mixing degenerates with a race fetish?https://x.com/jerr_rrej/status/2010402727285637123
I'm not saying he's right, but it's kind of interesting how judaism is both a religion AND a race, so they can say thay race mixing is inherently against their religion. Meanwhile they encourage others to do the opposite.
>>525762324if you reduce race down to biology, you're irredeemably stupid.
>>525762324Fertile brown pussy is made for BWC, amen
>>525762523israel is potentially the most mutted nation in the world, retardthere are nordic jews, ethiopian jews, indian jews and more
>>525762324retarded take
>>525762324>we hab to destroy da church if we wanna be the real Christians, amirite fellow real Christians? Dis is because christians now are [insert propaganda villian here] and if we get ridded of da christianity we will be really really real christians then.This is your brain on protestantism with a dash of leftist-designed right wing propaganda
>>525762324>>525767130for the most part churches have abandoned preaching Jesus, repentance and biblical doctrine in favor of not being offensive to people and bring their member numbers up.we live in the last church age, the lukewarm church, after all.a personal relationship with Jesus can be done by your own in your closet so most people dont see a reason to attend church services.its sad, but that the reality we live in.
>>525767130>>525767449as to say, the churches destroyed themselves essentially.
>>525767449>>525767474>its already over so give upEverything you said is correct only for protestant "churches" which today are nothing but social clubs for those who are still ignorant of the true faith thanks to their cultural conditioning and generations of protestant lies. Protestant "churches" are not churches, they are modernism factories masquerading as churches. It is easy to say "the church has fallen" if you remove Catholicism from the equation, but if you give it its rightful place (as the primary and historic model of Christianity) it becomes clear that protestantism is merely a multi-headed beast of continual corruption that takes whatever shape it needs to in order to weaken Christianity through modernist propaganda. Saying "the church has fallen" is not a correct way to describe the phenomena that troubles you, you should instead say "protestantism is working".>we should have a personal relationship with JesusYes, and this is the Catholic position of seeking God's grace and personal revelation in your own life as a new man in Christ. When presented through a protestant lens the same idea effectively means: "don't read about the saints, don't examine the catechism, or any historical precedent for what Christianity should be - imagine Christianity to be whatever you want Christianity to be, rely on personal interpretation and kick out anything that is old or religious" which of course is a recipe for what you describe: a thousand forms of watered down pseudo-Christianity.>most people don't see a reason to attend church servicesAnother modernist protestant crutch is to defame "organized religion", to say you are "spiritual but not religious", to say "Christ hates the church", which is of course nonsense that relies on emotional leading and not reason. Christianity from its earliest days encouraged (and rightly so) all forms of working together and living as one family united in Christ. Does a soldier scoff at the idea of being part of his army?
>>525769307>Does a soldier scoff at the idea of being part of his army?That's not in the bible
>>525770419I did not say it was, it was an analogy to showcase that the idea that you are presenting is absurd:>omg do we really need churches, JUST, augh, amirite? muh closet is good enough for real ChristiansDoes the insane idea that Christians shouldn't be a part of a Christian community (aka a church) have any other relative context to support that position? Are soldiers just strong lone wolfs who win wars all on their own or are they part of an army for a reason? Do they work as a team for a reason? Do ships need a captain and crew who works according to his needs? Would every sailor just doing "whatever he thinks the ship needs" and ignoring the captains "so called authority" ever get them to the next port? Do see how it is a seemingly simplistic idea related to "personal freedom" that carries the hidden subtext of:>Stop the rituals!>Hide the relics!>Destroy all sacraments and devotions!>Do not let them perform mass!>Do not go to confession, just #repent and that can be as simple as forgiving yourself or just chilling>Do not encourage baptism, just take a shower on your own instead or whatever you feel like is better than that icky religious stuff.It is not some sort of dominant position to think "we don't need churches to be Christian", it is irrational and leads to watered-down Christianity. The church is the body of believers working in union and doing God's will. Yes you are an individual believer with your own progression and perspective, sure, but that is nothing new and not some power move to absolve you of the obvious path of studying the bulk of Christian history in favor of your own musings (which without a proper foundation are inevitably tainted with bizarre personal interpretations). It is a modernist idea to weaken believers and make them become ignorant of the work which Christ called us to do: to love each other as he has loved us. That can't happen from inside your closet, my friend.
>>525770419If we were in medieval Europe do you think saying "We don't even need the Church!" would be a popular idea or would be an absurd thing to say? The church was the central administration for all things as all things existed as a part of God's design. It is only in modern times that the atheistic fervor (which formed as a result of the degeneration of Christian society thanks to ever devolving protestantism being the public relations team of Christian living) has delivered us this hyper-individualist perspective. First "we don't need the Catholic Church, we only need the Bible" then "we don't need churches at all only the Bible" then "We don't need the strict interpretations of the Bible only our own lax personal interpretations" then "We don't need the Bible, Jesus was merely one of many good teachers, like Ghandi" then "We don't believe in God" and finally "We are satanists, amirite my fellow antagonists of all things religious? We don't actually believe in satan we're just trolling Christians.". That is how it has gone for many of our would-be Christian brothers and sisters and it is all due to protestant interpretations needing to distance themselves from things that are "too-Catholic" to the point that they write out the faith entirely in favor of signaling that they are cool to modernists and not anything like "old mean Christianity".
M'lady
