Looks like we are considering our own nukes in an European context.https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/atombombe-usa-verteidigung-bundeswehr-groenland-li.3365668>“The year started brutally,” Pieper emphasizes. The behavior of the United States clearly shows that Germany and Europe can no longer reliably depend on the U.S. and its nuclear umbrella. His conclusion: “Germany needs its own nuclear weapons.” Above all, mobile tactical nuclear weapons. “Weapons that (can) counter the ultimate threat posed by Russia,” says Pieper. His advice: “Get out of bed and get to work. In the end, what has always applied still applies: when things get serious, you stand alone.”Get nuked mutts
>>525795267>CDU foreign policy expert Roderich Kiesewetter has also shared Pieper’s article. Kiesewetter does not have an easy standing within the CDU/CSU parliamentary group because of his positions, >but few members of the Bundestag are as well versed in security policy as the retired colonel. Kiesewetter is now floating a bold idea—also intended as food for thought for the chancellor’s National Security Council. >The frequently voiced consideration that Germany could shelter under the French nuclear umbrella, even though France’s arsenal is militarily limited, also entails political uncertainty from Kiesewetter’s perspective. >In the next elections, the far-right bloc around Marine Le Pen could emerge victorious.>“The issue is handled only with kid gloves, like a raw egg. But we have to deal with it—especially with regard to a Greenland scenario and its consequences for NATO and for relations with the United States,” Kiesewetter told the Süddeutsche Zeitung. >According to security experts, similar internal deliberations have long been underway in countries such as Sweden, Finland, and Poland.>“If American protection ends, another form of protection must take its place. It cannot be in Germany’s interest for a nuclear arsenal to develop around us without us being part of it,” Kiesewetter emphasizes. >Germany could contribute financially to a European nuclear shield without assuming leadership. “Experts estimate a development period of around five years. I personally assume closer to ten years.” >And yes, there would be complex questions to resolve: who would have command authority, what the decision-making mechanisms would look like, how deployment would work, where the weapons would be stored, and where tests would take place.
Why do you guys all wanna die so bad? Does it really suck that much being European?
>>525795382But it would be really funny to nuke mutts.
>>525795471Oh, you.
>>525795267Be funny to see trumps response to Europe saying they were going to make nukes after Israel just claiming Iran was motivated military strikes.
