Nordic Nuclear Weapons and ICBM.Pros and cons ?
>>525804199I start with obvious positives+ Ability to destroy our enemies who threaten Nordic way of life+ Lowering our dependency of Amerifats and Eurocucks
you lot are currently under jewish occupation so there's higher odds those nukes will be used on your own white citizens than an enemy
If North Korea can so should we.
>>525804882Also some fucking thirdworld shitholes like India and Pakistan.
DO IT NORDS! DO ITGO NUCLEAR CONQUER GREENLAND DO IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
the con would be shitlibs with nukes
>>525804325The Nordic way of life like being physically dominated by small groups of middle easterners at home
>>525804199>prosmutts seething>conscosts money
every country that values their sovereignity should seek out nuclear armament imo
>>525804199Any states that wishes to retain its sovereignty has to develop, produce and maintain its own nuclear weapons.
>>525804199>prosits funni>consmore countries have them sooner they become normal and not scaaaaawy >>525804325>Nordic way of lifechugging coffee to cope with only having 2 hours of daylight? With nukes you can fix that too.
>>525804199Denmark already has a Nuuk on Greenland.
>>525807573>>525807734Every country with the capability already has them
>>525808067Anyone can do it, the tech is 80 years old.It's a matter of politicians having the guts to push for it and other nations letting the process be completed before invading or sabotaging it.A dirty bomb you can make in your shed and the materials are reasonably easy to come by (for a state, not a person). Enriching uranium is the bottleneck, especially when you don't have the necessary equipment or specialists and are being strangled by sanctions preventing imports of the necessary parts (see also: Iran). Since it's a club the members of which are eager to gatekeep others from joining, whoever attempts to ascend will have accidents and setbacks happen. See also: Iran again.
>>525808523I doubt enriching uranium is a problem for Nordics. We can do it in record time and under the budget.
>>525804199Let's check in on Norway...
>>525808729Well yes, these countries haven't spent decades cut off from most of the developed world, aren't constantly on the verge of a regime change, don't have a cunning and capable mortal enemy within a fighter jet's range, have their economies in order and are known to produce some of the brightest minds. They have the technical means to do it. Do they have the political willpower though?
Sweden already developed Nuclear weapons during the cold war, then didn't make any at the request of the US. If you didn't think they could be bigger cucks, now you know.
pros: yay we can nuke USAcons: it's probably gonna be mostly under swedish control
