>Gets Jammed Lmao.
Poor Mossad has to resort to using pigeons and smoke signals. And you're laughing.
>>525810720
>>525810720>Elon Musk claims Shartlink is unjammableMay I see it?
Someone set up the hardware on the ground poorly. Doesn't mean there's anything wrong with the satellites or their signals.
>>525811056Saaar saar Shartlink is powerful like lord Hanuman!!!
>>525810720>RF signal that is barely above the noise floor is unjammableat this point, it is the fault of the retards who listen to him
kek
>>525810720>>525810831
>>525810720>it's cloudy outside todayITS JAMMED
>>525810720honestly, why doesn't Iran shoot down starlink satellites? ITU-T rules says Iran is within their rights to do it by now.
>>525811936That would require high precision orbital strikes. From the israeli footage, we already saw they were non-precision strikes. >Why cant they make them like thatImagine targeting your kitchen table. At least it is stationary relative to earth, it has precise gps coordinates available, it doesn't fucking try to move.Now imagine your table going 10km/sec. If you get the timing wrong, you're bombing yourself
>>525811863>not PUSSY IN BIO
>>525812352but I was told Iran had amazing missile tech....either way, elon is technically violating an international treaty if he isn't turning off service to Iran if they really banned it.
>>525811936>honestly, why doesn't Iran shoot down starlink satellites?it'd be far too expensive to knock out the constellations as you'd only get one per direct-ascent asat missile. you'd need to develop a co-orbital kidnapper satellite that can go from satellite to satellite as it disables them. iran doesn't currently have the ability to do this.you could probably disable them with a high energy laser on the cheap though.
>>525810720Scamlink
>>525810720jamming would mean high loss or no connection at allwhich this doesn't show also why are they checking speed to bulgaria from all places
>>525813274You only need to get a few and then they all go downhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kessler_syndrome
>>525811936>why doesn't iran commit an act of war against the USyou are retardedalso ITU-T is protocol recommendation and purely voluntary >>525812576i'm guessing you're again referring to the ITUthe ITU is entirely technical regulations and recommendations to prevent systems from interfering with each other in harmful ways
>>525810720Niggas don't know about starshield
>>525813889Sneed's Feed & Seed (formerly Chuck's)
They must have some way to recognize the signature and hop wavelengths. Solutions thst leap to mind-- Broadcast each link across ALL wavelengths. The signal lock isn't the wavelength, but rather an encription pattern.I know from Astronomy that you can resolve 90% of an image with only a few bits and pieces of lense. You might be able to do something similar here. So the infomation is actually sent across all frequencies, where the data is held in the difference between freqiencies rather than the modulation of amplitude. That way your signal is never locked down to a specific frequency, or even a specific band of frequencies. If they try to jam a band, most of the information should still come through. -- Another idea is on the recieving end. Set up a paired reciever (node A, node B) that is able to directionally locate the signal. Then you only accept signals from above. That way jamming won't work
>>525816089Jamming is just a giant white noise generator. Even if you switch freq, and the end user devices are legally allowed to transmit/receive on the new freq and is actually capable of listening on that new freq, The white noise generator can always increase its em interference range. Its like trying to listen to someone whispering while you're in the middle of a rock concert. Only extremely high amplitude low bitrate signals have a chance of resolving.
>>525816466Yeah butif they just jam every single frequency they'll interfere with their own shit. This is clearly something more targeted than that.
>>525816466How I imagine it works>packets are sent across a selected frequency>this frequency changes all the time and the source-location changes all the time because satellites>but, there is still an identifiable signature that is being traced by chinese softwareWhat I'm suggesting>instead of modulating amplitude to send data, modulate frequency>this means the entire spectrum is awash in your data instead of being neatly confined to one frequency>the difficulty here is parsing the signal, you can still modulate amplitude as well, so selecting your signal from the tangle should be straightforward enough>since the information transmits across a frequency derivative, any patchwork interruption can be smoothed over rather easily. Kind of like how a telescope can resolve an image 90% of the way even if only a few fragments of the imageplate are useable (hence combining image plates of numerous telecopes across earth can effectively generate an earth-size telescope even if most of the image-plate is missing)Another way to go is directional imagingm make an AB sampler so that it only resolves frequencies coming from a certain direction. That way frequencies transmited at ground-level have no effect. Kind of like placing a circular tube over your telescope to filter out light pollution, so incident light can only fall down from one direction
>>5258107200,01 Mbps Still faster then what i had with 56k Modem...
>NOOOOOOOOOOO I NEED MY HIGH SPEED BROADBAND INTERNETthe only reason this is even a problem is because reporting has shifted from words to pictures and video. and with the ease of faking them, those are becoming worthless anyways.you can absolutely tell everyone about whatever barbarism is going on with text. Pic says 0.15 MB/s. 1 letter is 1 byte. That's 150,000 letters PER SECOND you can communicate the ills of Iran to the world with.furthermore, if this is targeted towards starlink then what about every other kind of radio? hf, vhf, uhf can't possibly all be jammed, the rf spectrum is too large. amateur radio operators can and do talk around the world with couple dozen feet of wire.nobody that's actually seriously interested in maintaining communication during a crisis would have zero backup to starlink.
>>525810720How did Iran do it? it thought they were a third world shithole
>>525819072China
>>525810720EVERYBODY GET UP IT'S TIME TO SLAM NOW WE GOT A REAL JAM GOIN DOWNWELCOME TO THE SPACE JAM
>>525819110I imagine it's Russia as it both captures and jammed Starlink in Ukraine for 4 years now.
>>525811936and what exactly do you think the USA would do to Iran if they tried?
>>525810720He is a liar. He lies about all of his projects in order to inflate his own net worth.
>>525810720You mean Indians lie about deliverables?
first of all, impossible to jam nationwide, simply unrealistic, however its likely they could manage it in an area like Tehran and it would be prudent if you were the Iranian Govt to invest in hardware for this purpose. That being said, the screenshot clearly shows that a connection is still possible, and text and even a screenshot seem to be possible to send, so.... the whole point of Iran's "jamming" is rendered null and void since information is still freely being shared. There is also good ol HF radio which impossible to fully jam considering the wide plethora of frequencies. Iran will never be able to get a full comms blackout, not in 2026. Radio and sat comms are simply too accessible to the average joe.
>>525819110This, just turn on some Chinesium water cookers and the entire RF spectrum becomes unusable.
>>525810720I wonder if you cannot just track the satellite dish via drones surely they will glow like a bright sun with thermal vision. Also much like the radars the US uses for the air defense they expose themselves if you have a good satellite system that should be possible to track via drones as well.
Also, there are established ways to overcome local area jamming, military GPS has a built in feature which allows the military to increase beam strength by physically pointing directional satellite antennas at an area to give a 10x+ fold increase in signal strength which is not easily overcome since the signal is encrypted and the receiver will ignore any non encrypted signal. The same can technically be done with Starlink, if Elon really really wanted to, they have that capability.
>>525819610>HF radio which impossible to fully jam considering the wide plethora of frequenciesNot entirely accurate, HF is a much smaller frequency range compared to microwave. HF spectrum is around 27MHz wide, just one of the Starlink bands is multiple GHz. What makes HF more difficult to jam is simply scale, if Iran wanted to jam HF they could but it would require physically large antennas compared to the tiny chip antennas used for GHz/microwave. The USSR made massive infrastructure investments in huge antenna farms to jam shortwave western news radio. They wouldn't even need to be very close to the target given HF propagation. But HF operators aren't computers, so if their signal gets interrupted they can frequency hop, use directional antennas, or simply live with the noise if they can still pull a signal out. Amateur radio is essentially based around trying to pull out weak signals and there are entire protocols based around this. Starlink and other digital comms are more concerned with throughput given good conditions, and suffer from the cliff effect where if SNR drops too low you get zero throughput because of the protocol, analog comms can still pull some information out.My guess is as others have said, the Starlink protocol may be partially reverse engineered and jamming efforts are concentrated on using some heuristic to interrupt sessions given the properties of the Starlink protocol.
>>525810831Just think, those pigeons were supposed to be carrying some Jews sins.
>>525810720well, was unjammable
>>525810971probably as legit as the claim that they jammed sattelite communication across their entire nation of 636,372 square miles with most of it being mountains
>>525811936the pbo is corrupt and they cant load the server to record a video (they pay for RHS streamed from north korea)
