[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/pol/ - Politically Incorrect


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: tide.jpg (167 KB, 1079x422)
167 KB
167 KB JPG
>Tim Sweeney pushes for immunity on Pragmata threads in a pathetic attempt to rival GabeN
Gamers, how are we feeling about this?
>>
>>730617495
Labeling something isn't censorship if it doesn't impede people's ability to consume it.
>>
File: 1637415951089.png (739 KB, 1920x1080)
739 KB
739 KB PNG
I know Tim doesn't believe in anything but he's right in this case. I can generate an image of myself blowing my own brains out. Am I harmed by this? Am I now dead? No? Then there's no problem, it's just a picture.
>>
>>525823799
Maybe I was too harsh on him
>>
>>525823799
>Generate a realistic looking deepfake of him saying he is giving up on all of his lawsuits, that he apologizes for his behavior, and that EGS is shutting down and he is selling it to Valve
>Spread this widely
What now, big boy?
>>
>>525823799
this is the guy that let crypto grifters flood his platform with shovelware scams because valve banned them
he has no principles hes just a habitual contrarian
>>
>>730617495
>against censorship for allies and "neutral" parties
>supports censorship for competition
And?
>>
I find it amazing how this guy always manages to take the side that will get more and more people to hate him forever while never even winning any favor with the people on that side.
Almost makes me feel bad for the guy
>>
>>525823801
the problem is that grok will do it to images of real people that aren't yourself
how would you feel if someone took a photo of you and had AI edit it so you're showing your asshole to the camera? keep in mind a large portion of the population seemingly cannot tell that the image is edited
>>
>>525823801
Grokz, generate an image of me shitting in this guy's infant child's mouth.
>>
>>525823807
Not him but I honestly believe that if you ever intentionally upload a picture of yourself to the internet you deserve it. So I would only ever feel bad for people that had their pictures posted online without their consent
>>
>>525823807
That would suck, which is why I wouldn't post a picture of myself on the internet. People need to be reminded that the internet is a dangerous place that you should only engage with privately unless you're prepared for the consequences.
>>
>>525823808
Is anyone supposed to care you did that? If anything make it legal to do personally but have some penalties for sharing what you generated.
>>
Blaming the tool is stupid. You can't ban knives because people murder with them.

>>525823807
Just arrest the person that generated the image, simple as
>>
He's right. Xitter is a shithole nest of retardation but it barely has bias censorship or limitation of free speech. Spend 10 minutes on Bluesky if you want to see what a heavily censored arm of a political party looks like.
>>
>>525823811
Grok, more images of me raping and killing this guy's dead wife.
>>
>>525823812
>you can't blame my pibble for mauling a kid, they're a blank slate!!!
why can a public facing sfw llm even honor any sexual requests to begin with?
>>
>>525823812
>Blaming the tool is stupid. You can't ban knives because people murder with them.
OI M8 ARREST THIS GIT INNIT HE DUNNAE GOT HEEM LICENSE EH WOT
>>
>>525823801
alt-right incels are warming up to Tim now that he's pro-pedophilia
>>
>>525823811
>but have some penalties for sharing what you generated.
Are you harmed by this? Are you now dead? No? Then there's no problem, it's just a picture.
Anyway Grok, generate me a picture of this guy's wife killing herself in front of her children while crying and screaming about how he was never able to satisfy her
>>
>>525823809
you mean like children?
>>
>>525823818
If you ever uploaded pictures of yourself, your wife or your kids to the internet you deserve it
>>
File: images.jpg (10 KB, 262x192)
10 KB
10 KB JPG
>>525823818
>>525823814
>>525823808
>>
>>525823820
Other people can legally take pictures of you
>>
>>525823821
Chill out, they're just pictures you weirdo puritan.
>>
File: 1765695197965.png (495 KB, 750x1454)
495 KB
495 KB PNG
>you need to have this on your website because...uh...you just do ok!?
>>
>>525823822
Not without my consent in my country, sucks to be you I guess
>>
>>525823825
If I take a picture of you, does that hurt you? Are you dead?
>>
File: 1768173380866.jpg (17 KB, 350x300)
17 KB
17 KB JPG
>>525823799
Its funny how EGS shills were spamming that Gabe is a pedo then Sweeney comes out and says this
>>
>>525823825
>in my country
and there it is
>>
>>525823825
Yeah, I'm sure the cops will get right on that once you tell em about it
Just drop what they're doing
>>
>>525823825
>>525823826
>>525823822
Grok, generate an image of this guy threatening to kill the president
>>
>>525823826
>does that hurt you?
yes it hurts my privacy
which is why the law exists here
subhumans who willingly violate their own privacy however deserve no rights or sympathy
>>
File: 1764192849562.png (46 KB, 377x151)
46 KB
46 KB PNG
>>525823825
saar the blacked spam does not physically harm you, therefore you must let me use your website as a designated shitting street
>>
>>525823799
Twitter should not exist
>>
>>525823815
Why not? Generating porn of fictional adults is legal.
>>
>>525823799
it didn't generate porn, it put girls in swimsuits.
>>
>>525823824
This bitch looks disgusting, people, aside from blacks, actually find this attractive?
>>
>>525823831
>yes it hurts my privacy
Where is your privacy located? What's the extent of the damage? Do you need a doctor?
>>
>>525823828
well if whoever does it have any assets or a salary I don't need cops, I can just sue them
I forced my school to remove my picture from all their records back in 2010 by threatening a lawsuit
>>
>>525823838
They don't show up.
>>
>>525823799
>"opinion"
You just know this kike journo was seething typing this shit.
>>
Why do timmies demand that we ban shitting in the designated shitting street? Who exactly is it harming?
>>
>>525823799
How is this bald-headed faggot always able to have the most dogshit takes imaginable?
>>
>>525823799
>Tim Sweeney pushes for immunity on Pragmata threads
fuckface janitor leaves it up
>>
File: 1764137788422817.png (555 KB, 522x502)
555 KB
555 KB PNG
I really dont care if you ask Grok to generate a picture of me shitting on my mom's face while she fucks Mike Tyson's BBC while grandpa kills himself or whatever, anyone with a brain will know it's not real. The only problem is if you try to generate this stuff and deliberately pass it off as a real thing that happened.
>>
>>730618751
he really looked at the worst site on the internet and thought "how do I make this more cancerous"
>>
>>525823844
>only if you try to pass it off as real
Yes? That's the concern. Retard.
>>
>>525823825
Someone can just use AI to make a model that resembles a person without taking a photograph
>>
File: 1660209528353962.jpg (186 KB, 1061x1019)
186 KB
186 KB JPG
>>525823799
>Gamers, how are we feeling about this?
He's right in so far as politicians using porn as a trojan horse to ban stuff they're actually interested in banning later because they know nobody will die on a hill to defend porn.
>>
>>525823846
Meaning what? It exists so the person generating it is trying to imply it's real? That's not how libel laws work.
>>
>>525823848
I am all for using porn as a trojan horse to ban Twitter, genAI, or both
>>
>>525823807
well yeah, but that's just how things are now.
anyone can turn an image into a video with ai and its going to trick boomers regardless.
>>
>>525823799
You can tell exactly who has and hasn't had their brain melted by AI exposure by seeing how they react to this twitter thing. Being able to undress any human being who posts their photo on twitter at will is absolutely "this has gone too far" territory, but some people have already harmed themselves so much they can't see it anymore. "The fact I can put your infant daughter into bdsm gear is fine, it's just a picture, it doesn't mean anything, grow up."
>>
>>525823799
The media lying about an honest man like Tim Sweeney like this is disgusting
>>
>>525823852
At some point in time people also understood why privacy was important. If you don't want other people fucking with your shit you better keep it secret.
>>
@grok fuck OP in the ass
>>
I will wear AR glasses and undress people in real time and you literally can't stop me.
>>
>>525823850
you're a retard because banning one social media platform will just be a precedent to ban others in the future
and genAI will never get banned, the best you'll get is banning regular people from using it
>>
>>525823809
>if you ever intentionally upload a picture of yourself to the internet
I've never done this but i assume family has uploaded pics with me in it to faceberg without asking for permission.
>>
>>525823852
Remember back in the day when posting your picture and personal information was considered fucking retarded? Maybe we can go back to those days now
>>
>>525823854
You are actively encouraged by apps to share images, you can't put all the blame on foolhardy parents, nor can you expect people to have anticipated that a nudification robot was going to be activated someday and given free reign of twitter.
>>
>>525823857
>banning one social media platform will just be a precedent to ban others in the future
not hearing a downside
>>
>>525823807
Why are you photos images of yourself all over the internet?
>>
File: 1766387223397476.png (252 KB, 541x741)
252 KB
252 KB PNG
It's honestly insane to what depths Tim is willing to dig himself into to maybe
MAYBE
SOMEDAY
Have a complete monopoly on game distribution.
As in an actual one, not the Valve "Literally everyone else is too stupid and malicious to ever compete with us" 'monopoly'.
>>
The idea that we have to ultra censor and control the internet just so people can safely overshare their private info online is just horribly distopian. The perfect diabolical deal between the government that wants control and tech companies that want your data.
>>
>>525823859
I've been saying that for years, unfortunately the generation younger than me (zoomers) have been conditioned into giving out as much information as possible, they would honestly be confused why someone wouldn't readily post their photo online. And I can only imagine it's worse for the people younger than that.
>>
File: good.png (43 KB, 264x232)
43 KB
43 KB PNG
>>525823857
>you're a retard because banning one social media platform will just be a precedent to ban others in the future
>>
File: 1749121848261.gif (446 KB, 250x250)
446 KB
446 KB GIF
>>525823857
>but then people who cant figure out what a vpn is wont be able to use social media
What's the bad part?
>>
>>525823864
You not having the right to generate porn of people and directly send it to them and anyone they know is some basic rights shit.
>inb4 a miscomparison to a public person, or doing something silly and harmless like playing tic tac toe on a guy's big forehead which people would still completely agree he'd be in the right to say you need to stop.
>>
File: 1704233214535025.jpg (9 KB, 225x225)
9 KB
9 KB JPG
>>525823850
>using porn as a trojan horse to ban Twitter
You're not banning twitter, you're banning opinions you don't like, which is sort of eh, you ban them today, tomorrow they ban you, the cycle of idiocy continues.
>genAI
People with infinitely deep pockets and military interests are creating AI, image/video generation is just a small thing. It's going nowhere.
>>
>>525823854
>>525823859
How many times does "you don't actually need to be the one to upload pictures of yourself to the internet" need to be repeated before you get it through your thick fucking skull? What do you expect people to do, live as a hermit forever?
>>
>twitter becomes more untouchable for advertisers, gets branded as deepfake central, loses users, website eats shit
>twitter gets fucked up by regulations, eats shit
Tell me why I should feel bad about twitter? I don't give a fuck, let it burn.
>>
>>525823871
/v/ has way too many twitter tourists on it unfortunately.
>>
>>525823870
>What do you expect people to do, live as a hermit forever?
Yes.
>>
>>525823807
Back in 97 my mon told me to never post my image online. Or tell anyone my real name.
I've followed her advice and it seems to have paid off.
>>
>>525823868
The thing is, I can do it and there's nothing you can do about it. There are many free models that can do this already. Trying to ban twitter will not solve this problem.
>>
>>525823799
This is literally what happened with the UK law BTW, within 24 hours it was used to remove political content.
>>
>>525823872
I know, and I'm here to tell them that they aren't welcomed anywhere. Their shithole home can burn and be destroyed, nothing of value would be lost.
>>
File: 1767644870182846.jpg (9 KB, 189x250)
9 KB
9 KB JPG
20 years ago if a woman posted a picture online people would Photoshop it into porn. Now it's this.
There's no meaningful difference and the solution is simple: stop posting pictures of you on the Internet.
>>
>>525823875
>The thing is, I can do it and there's nothing you can do about it.
I could come to your house and kill you for no real reason, that doesn't mean I have the right to do it because people didn't sufficiently try to stop me.
That's nigger thinking.
Quit being a nigger.
>>
>>525823799
Thanks Tim
>>
>>525823878
Photoshop required someone to actually buy or pirate the program and have a half-decent skill at head or body swapping in order to make a somewhat convincing fake whereas every coomer on Xitter can just say "@grok remove clothes" and have their request within seconds. It isn't comparable and, again, you don't actually need to be the one to upload the pictures of yourself.
>>
>>525823878
the ability to Photoshop someone into porn was a specialized skillset requiring specialized software, not an automated pornografier.
>>
>>525823878
There is a very meaningful difference when you constantly get a prompt to do it on every image, it''s literally what caused this whole thing now
>>
>>525823881
I have a model on my machine that can do this too. The situation is already out of control.
>>
>>525823878
@grok put in bbc anal
>>
>>525823879
In your retarded analogy you are trying to make visiting other peoples homes illegal because someone might murder. If someone makes you a deep fake and tries to present them as real, sue them, simple as. No need to censor anything
>>
File: 0wtf is this.jpg (36 KB, 750x676)
36 KB
36 KB JPG
>>525823799
Has this faggot ever had a good opinion in his life?
>>
>>525823878
but then how are attention whores gonna profit?
>>
>>525823886
>SHEEEET NIGGA, JUST BECAUSE I WANT TO STEAL SHIT FROM WALLMART??
>YOU TRYING TO SAY A NIGGA CAN'T GO TO WALMART JUST BECAUSE I WANT TO STEAL SHIT???
>SHIEEEET CRACKA YOU STOO-PEED
That's you.
That's what you actually sound like.
>>
>if you didnt want your posts screencapped and put on twitter you shouldn't have posted on 4chan
>>
>>525823890
4chan doesn't run on people posting personal photographs.
Twitter on the other hand...

It would be so fucking funny if people stopped posting any personal photos on twitter and traffic to the website drop off a cliff as people stop using it as social media.
>>
>>525823799
I unironically respect Tim a lot. Sure I'd never buy anything from his store, but he is correct about 90% of problems, plus he made google his bitch.
>>
>>525823882
>the ability to Photoshop someone into porn was a specialized skillset requiring specialized software, not an automated pornografier.
Ok and? You're fine with AI taking every artist/designer/shooper's job so why not with this too?
>>
>>525823891
"Social media" should fucking die. It's disgusting.
>>
>>525823893
No one said this.
>>
>>525823895
Everyone is perfectly fine with it though, so don't pretend now that it's something that you personally don't like.
>>
>>525823799
>bikinies are porn
Somehow Americans are more puritan than ever before
>>
>>525823893
I'm not fine with that either, and as I said here >>525823850, I'd be happy to see genAI as a whole get regulated more heavily as a result of Elon being an idiot
>>
>>525823896
not everyone is Indian, Rajesh
>>
Stop doing this so openly retards. The niggercattle CAN kill this if you piss them enough.

WE ALREADY LOST SO MUCH OF THE OLD INTERNET CUZ THE NORMALFAGS ARE WEAK TO THE "MUH CHILDREN" FEAR DO IT LOCAL FFS
>>
>>525823799
He's right of course, people have been doing this shit since photoshop existed.
>>
>>525823852
Retard
>>
>>525823857
>you're a retard because banning one social media platform will just be a precedent to ban others in the future
And this is bad, how?

Also don't forget Texas's anti anime law also includes AI created CP, so twitter is already breaking the law there.
The problem is Musk is a far right conservative like those who control Texas, so the fact they aren't going to prosecute him for creating and spreading CP shows the total hypocrisy of these anti porn laws too.
>>
>>525823903
Based chadservatives. Cry about it
>>
>>525823871
>Tell me why I should feel bad about twitter?
because it won't end there retard
>>
File: scoup.jpg (168 KB, 1280x720)
168 KB
168 KB JPG
>>525823903
>Musk is a far right conservative
>>
>>525823809
My mom babysits my niece on workdays and had uploaded new pictures of her basically every day to Facebook since she was born. The people who told us not to share personal information online are almost exclusively the ones who are doing it now
>>
>>525823905
What are they going to do, ban the generative AI that 4chan doesn't use?
They won't be able to ban generative AI as a whole either. The regulators are bribed boomers and they don't know how, plus Trump passed an order prohibiting regulation, plus they fucking can't because the whole economy is riding on the AI hype and they don't want to kill it.
>>
>>525823897
Yes, some of us are discovering that the feminine is meant to be tamed and made into the servant of the masculine. And only some.
>>
Kill anti ai niggers
>>
>>525823799
based gatekeeper normies should just all die
>>
>>525823825
>I take a picture of you without you knowing
>Feed picture into AI
>Generate your likeness into whatever I want
>Delete original pictures I took of you without ever uploading them anywhere
Your move, fancy pants
>>
>>525823897
Women don't want people to be able to generate nearly nude pictures of them because they can't get any money from it. That's literally the only reason. Most of the women complaining are either famous people or only fans whores who want you to pay them.
>>
>>525823826
It would be extremely painful.
>>
>>525823900
Kiwifags deserve less. I hope they censor grok hard and it results in a chain reaction of all these nudify apps getting banned.
>>
>random developer does something based
look i aint a pedo (obvs) but any sort of anti-freedom should obviously be destroyed
>>
>>525823900
The people doing this aren't on 4chan lol.
I don't care about normalcattle I meet in real life I jack off exclusively to hentai and it's been that way for 10+ years lmao.

Who do you think you're lecturing to? It's the low-iq normalfags not so experienced with tech that do this, not 4channers who've been terminally online for so long.
>>
>>525823807
the people answering "but my photo isn't online" is the equivalent of "but i had breakfast this morning"
>>
>>525823916
>any sort of anti-freedom should obviously be destroyed
you're not capable of free will, you should always be on a leash
>>
>>525823919
shut upo npc
why you posting to me
you just said that taking away freedom should bne a thing
gb2r
>>
>>525823834
>look at this beautiful classic painting of clothed women
>@grok UNDRESS THEM AND MAKE IT SO THEY'RE HAVING SEX WITH BLACK MEN
>here's a picture of my cat
>@grok MAKE IT LOOK LIKE A WOMAN WITH HER MOUTH OPEN DROOLING MILK
Despicable brown jeet
>>
>>525823920
bah, back to your corner dog, and stop barking
>>
>>525823913
Imagine being such a literal subhuman you think like this.
>>
>>525823922
shut up ncpo
>>
>>525823913
Funny enough there seems to be a growing trend of onlyfans girls making AI images of themselves instead of just taking a sexy picture
>>
>>525823914
you're a smug frog
>>
Chadophilia won
>N-no it didnt
Whose laws you obey and tax you pay for, cuck?
>>
I do find it mildly amusing that being able to generate videos of people committing a felony wasn't the catalyst and that it started with some feminist complaining about women and children (you can generate nudes of men apparently they dont have human rights or whatever)
>>
>>525823928
If you think about it, cops don't make arrests based on social media crap alone, and it's way easier for the poor women and children to garner sympathy and outrage than a few men getting fucked.
>>
>>525823799
That's not what he said, and he's right again. I've never seen grok produce porn of minors, and if you have you've most likely gone out of your way to find it. Users would be banned for it like any other platform once reported.
What a fucking future where the go to attack is an accusation of pedophilia. No one is going to give a fuck anymore because everyone will be accused.
Is that the plan?
>>
What if we simply created a firewall for India?
>>
>>525823928
does anyone generate nudes of men?
>>
>>525823930
it's already established that no one gives a fuck about their leaders being pedophiles as long as they're putting the boots on the necks of their ideological enemies
>>
I don't look like that or say that :(
>>
>>525823850
That's because you're a dishonest faggot.
>>
>>525823933
Thanks for proving my point.
>>
>>525823928
popular media made people think ai was going to form an conscience and rebel against the world then it turns out people themselves are driving the ai against you in every form, i wish we got the instant armageddon ending not the slow burn we are right now ffs
>>
>>525823799
Never knew he was this fucking based
>>
File: tim sweeney.jpg (461 KB, 866x1024)
461 KB
461 KB JPG
>>730617673
I love this little autist so much
The one thing I don't like is how he is a Dookie despite never going to Duke
>>
>>525823801
Why can't people like you see the implications of anything? Like, wow, you're so smart. A picture is different from irl. I never thought of it that way.
>>
>>525823940
>the implications
Care to share?
>>
File: 1742696088404.jpg (13 KB, 710x264)
13 KB
13 KB JPG
>>730623545
>>
File: 6759067945a.png (1.71 MB, 1995x1219)
1.71 MB
1.71 MB PNG
>>525823882
>>525823881
That's bullshit. Photoshop is like $10 and there are 10 minute tutorials everywhere if you wanted to make porn.
You luddite fuckers are just boring hypocrites.
>>
>>525823887
Practically every time.
>>
>>525823942
Indians drink water so stop drinking water
>>
>>525823799
>steam bans and kills kino games like brown dust
>meanwhile tim is fighting for more lolis
HOLY BASED
EPIC WON
>>
>>525823943
That's cool, now how many of those Photoshop deepfakes were even remotely convincing compared to the amount of effort it was required to put in to them? How many deepfakes were being made compared to now?
>>
>>525823799
Ban Twitter. Starve the data centers.
>>
>>525823947
Just integrate AI into your deepfake workflow and don't worry man, if your in the upper 1% your still fine.
>>
>>525823942
>7 minutes ago
>username censored
Very genuine post
>>
>>525823809
Retard, you’re describing the precise circumstance anon just described. No one getting genAI’d to spread their asshole is having it done with their consent.
>>
File: VHPr7kj.jpg (55 KB, 720x502)
55 KB
55 KB JPG
>>525823947
We've had deepfakes since the 2000s. Or did you really think those giant Xbox or Bush is a monkey edits were real?
>>
>>525823862
It will be assembled from years of security cam footage
>>
How is this different from me opening Photoshop and putting a celebrity in bikini? Why are people losing their minds over this?
>>
>From the retards that gave you capitalism and democracy, I present you...consent!
Kys kikes
>>
>>525823951
If you upload an image to the internet, you are consenting to it being used for any purpose.
>>
>>525823807
Who exactly is supposed to be convinced by this argument?
>>
>>525823952
Are you being dense on purpose? The issue is scale. Photoshop is accessible and there are tutorials everywhere, yes, sure. The need to make Photoshop edits yourself was still a barrier of entry that filtered lazy people en masse, and now there's a free (legally) option where you don't even need to spend an hour learning a new skill.
>>
File: eiwbmplqk9y41.jpg (17 KB, 340x450)
17 KB
17 KB JPG
Oh my science, we need to ban Photoshop because of how real these edits are!
>>
>>525823954
Read the thread, it's already been answered. It's much easier for the average person with no photoshop skills to do, and they can do it near instantly.
>How is this different
Okay, make a photoshop celeb nude right now and let us see it. Post it in a catbox.moe link if you have to. Let us judge your work.

You have 10 minutes, if no replies by then, you're wrong.
>>
>>525823832
Holy shit that is hilarious
>>
>>525823799
I mean the guy kinda comes off as a diddler
>>
>>525823955
good morning saar
>>
>>525823799
PC Gamer are going to get proper fucked for this and they deserve it
>>
File: 1760841800650225.jpg (58 KB, 616x639)
58 KB
58 KB JPG
>>525823960
I don't work for free
>>
>>525823900
I don't do anything like that but I don't mind when cloud AI gets censored, it just encourages growth in the local scene. Ultimately you're just making the freedom you're giving up more obvious.
Look at the current mess we're going through with windows 11, if microsoft had decided to prevent users from watching porn in the pre-XP era, their OS would already be dead or at least contained
>>
>>525823958
Die kike
>>
>>525823824
indians are becoming too powerful
>>
>>525823967
Kikes love AI slop though?
>>
>>525823799
sue the press tim
>>
>>525823960
>It's much easier for the average person with no photoshop skills to do,
>"we should ban guitars because peasants can play music on the street now"
>>
>>525823965
but grok does (or rather, it did until the public backlash), and lots of other models can do too

so you admit there is a difference, the models will do it for free, you won't

>>525823971
I didn't say that anything should be banned, just that there is a difference in tech. Go slide down that slippery slope headfirst, don't wear a helmet.
>>
they will never give you money for your generations

the end.
>>
>>525823958
>The issue is scale. Paint and canvases are accessible and there are classes everywhere, yes, sure. The need to make paintings yourself was still a barrier of entry that filtered lazy people en masse, and now there's a free (legally) option where you don't even need to spend an hour learning a new skill.
BAN PHOTOSHOP
>>
File: 2mejgk.jpg (102 KB, 1254x809)
102 KB
102 KB JPG
Oh my science, Photoshop will distort the truth forever! We must ban it!
>>
>>525823974
6/10 almost got me to type up a genuine reply
>>
>>525823945
indians only invented the concept of drinking diarrhea
>>
>>525823807
people could already do this with photoshop, artists can draw pictures of you being retarded, if you feel this strong about it don't put your picture online, no one cares that you're offended by some indian using grok to put a random e-whore in a bikini
>>
Grug no think cave painting should be allowed because other caveman paint himself fucking Grug's wife. Now whole tribe think is real.
>>
File: 1765106564683.png (712 KB, 1099x1331)
712 KB
712 KB PNG
>>525823969
>>
File: Pragmata.jpg (277 KB, 1920x1080)
277 KB
277 KB JPG
>>525823799
Pragmata is a great game.
>>
File: BatBoy_01.jpg (331 KB, 1200x1400)
331 KB
331 KB JPG
Oh my science, a real newspaper posted this photo of Bat Boy. It must be real! Ban Photoshop!
>>
>>525823981
my completion is way faster than that
>if you know what I mean
>>
>>525823982
It's too bad easy AI images weren't around during the Trump "pee tape" push.
>>
>>525823978
>people can already kill each other with guns therefore it's okay if everybody has a nuke
>>
File: pregnata.jpg (131 KB, 1160x720)
131 KB
131 KB JPG
>>525823983
Same.
>>
>anti ai nigger exposed as a gun grabber
>>
>>525823976
Almost made you self reflect, but zoomers are terrified of that.
>>
>>525823985
>people can already kill each other with guns therefore it's okay if everybody has a nuke
Yes.
>>
>>525823987
>Implying this isn't a thread of you retarded jeets trying to explain why the AI is good and right wing saar like personal responsibility isn't a thing.
>>
>>525823939
>The one thing I don't like is how he is a Dookie despite never going to Duke
I have a buddy that is a Miami U fan despite never once having set foot in Florida.
It doesn't matter that they've never been there, it just has to have a thing they like about the place. In my buddy's case it's the football team.
>>
>>525823990
Personal responsibility would include not blaming everything on Indians
>>
>>525823992
It would if retarded fucking jeets weren't filling the internet with nudes of other people because they literally cannot grasp the concept of controlling themselves not to and find the concept ridiculous.
>>
>>730625629
many people are in fact banned from driving cars
>>
>>525823993
>jeets weren't filling the internet with nudes of other people
Stupid zoomer thinks this started with Indians
>>
>>525823993
And before you open your mouth you retarded brown fuck.
It's not okay to make porn of people you find attractive because you think you can't control yourself, Christian Weston Chandler.
Like damn I know what a shithole your country is and how bad this nation has degenerated, but I feel like shouldn't have to explain that fucking CHRISCHAN shouldn't be the model for how you conduct yourself online.
>>
>>525823799
lmao media going hard. twisting and overexaggerating facts because they are paid to push censorship propaganda
>>
>>525823995
>Couldn't even go five fucking minutes
Unbelievable.
>>
File: 1752794087800701.jpg (346 KB, 1095x1200)
346 KB
346 KB JPG
>>525823913
>>
>>525823996
>It's not okay to make porn of people you find attractive
Why not?
>>
>>525823996
>It's not okay to make porn of people you find attractive
lmao what the fuck
>>
File: 1757616104680421.gif (426 KB, 220x190)
426 KB
426 KB GIF
>>525823996
>It's not okay to make porn of people you find attractive
>>
>>525823799
>Twitter has a legitimate pedophile problem
>you can just make a new account immediately if you get banned
>people posting real illegal content
>now theyre using AI to create illegal content
At least (((meta))) bans porn from their platform when its reported. Generative AI is a fad that will go away aside from niche use cases online though, the push to integrate it into every product now is both jewish and indian at the same time.
>>
Im just sad for the real human artists put out by this.
>>
>>525823980
>victims of kikery dont like more kikery
is it really hard to understand? If someone's mentally disabled and someone else influences them you dont put blame on the retard. You blame the root cause. Jews. Its always jews. Racism? Jews use that to keep us all divided from rising up against them. They pit everyone against each other before they can realize they have a common enemy.
>>
>>525823959
This is extremely dangerous for Microsoft's likelyhood. Ban it!
>>
>>525823799
kek anti ai fags are now using the think of the children tactic. AIGods can't stop winning
>>
File: cover_art.png (126 KB, 316x316)
126 KB
126 KB PNG
>Tim Sweeney supporting HER GAME.
Wow......in the same way a broken clock is right twice a day, even a faggot can actually have a based idea every once in a while.
>>
File: 1767457747831108.png (131 KB, 753x916)
131 KB
131 KB PNG
Timmy won against apple. He could be the one to take down these nu-journos once and for all. Fuck those parasites.
>>
>>525823799
>Americans want to send people to jail because imaginary children
lmao
>>
>>525824010
Only in this case, the children aren't imaginary? They're actual children posted on Twitter.
>>
ai is a pure evil, an attack on the human soul, we should fight it at every opportunity, if you love Christ you will AGREE with this post!
>>
File: 1750594430181852.png (312 KB, 918x702)
312 KB
312 KB PNG
what do we think cliffy has to say on all this?
>>
>>525824010
They're real children with imaginary pictures.
>>
>>525824009
i will suck his dog dick if he actually makes vidya journalism illegal
>>
File: 1538964128562.jpg (77 KB, 1024x922)
77 KB
77 KB JPG
>>525824012
This but unironically
>>
>>525823799
>but you should be able to generate naked pictures of children! IT'S FREE SPEECH.
Mr. Weeney you already look like a pedophile, you don't need to prove it.
>>
>>525824017
You fell for fake news, mr. reactionary
>>
>>525823799
Oh geez is it really controversial to even take Groks side here?
I am enjoying the tool a lot
>>
>Tim Sweeney is really going to bat for AI generated Child Porn
>>
>>525824020
>read a misleading headline and made up his mind entirely from that
>>
>>525823799
Oh cool, the thread I made about this got purged by the mods. Thanks faggots
>>
>>525823825
murder is illegal everywhere but it still happens
>>
>>525824021
Sorry Tim, you're a pedophile
>>
>>525823801
get your local government to make pictures of you killing yourself illegal and then we can talk chud
>>
>>525824024
Why would you double down on your retardation instead of admitting your wrong and made a mistake jumping to conclusions from a misleading headline? Whats the reason?
>>
>>525824026
>you are de being retarded
Don't care, pedo
>>
Ai should be eradicated, homosexulaity and transgenderism outlawed, and india blockaded and sealed off from the rest of the world for all time
>>
>>525824019
we cannot ban this
>>
>>525823917
>everyone is me!
>>
>>525823799
>normies arguing over limited online grokslop
local SD chads are in a whole nother galaxy of debauchery. I am truly grateful for the ignorance and lack of concern from the masses on this matter.
>>
>>525823913
women are uploading photos of themselves and are asking AI to edit it, too
Stop putting them on a pedestal
>>
>>525823807
my friend generated a very realistic image of me with Epstein on his plane
i posted it on my insta, i couldnt give a fuck
>>
>>525823799
I agree with his conclusion however I do think Twitter should be banned but only because I think everyone who uses it is completely retarded and it would be funny.
>>
>>525823807
>Perhaps if I ban this one website that is able to generate these images, the entire technology will disappear!
Whole planet full of retards.
>>
>>525824005
Trannies are anti nazi though
>>
>>525824035
>Making murder illegal doesn't stop murderers, therefore murder should be legal
americlap logic
>>
>>525824010
>Americans
>>
tim is incredibly based
he only looks bad when he goes against gaben, who is also based
>>
Lets say you see an image
then you go out there in the real world to do something solely because of seeing the image
What could you plausibly do for someone to go "we should ban the tool used to make the image" ?
>>
>>525824040
Can I ban all humans instead? Then nobody could misuse the tool and nobody else could do something stupid because of it.
>>
>>525823799
Right wingers are really going to die on this hill, huh? Kids can't see a tranny on TV but child porn on their social media feed is fine?
>>
>>525824042
if you see a naked baby when youre changing its diapers do you naturally go "this is porn" and whip out your penis?
>>
>>525824042
>Right wingers are really going to die on this hill, huh?
They blame videogames for creating school shooters, but people who use grok to make child porn does not make pedophiles. It's simple logic anon.
>>
File: 1581839059586.gif (1.73 MB, 415x405)
1.73 MB
1.73 MB GIF
>>525823807
The replies to this are retarded.
There are cameras everywhere, family members have likely uploaded images of you to the internet without you knowing, and if you've ever been issued an ID or a driver's license, congrats, your picture is in a database somewhere.
This is like saying you have no need for privacy since you have nothing to hide.
>>
>>525824045
the post itself literally said
>if someone took a photo of you
but anons can't read
>>
File: 1472905764779.jpg (10 KB, 205x201)
10 KB
10 KB JPG
>>525823857
>you're a retard because banning one social media platform will just be a precedent to ban others in the future
Fine by me, I want every single one of those big platforms fucking destroyed. Maybe then we'll return to an internet that isn't just 6 big websites who all hate and yet can't stop sharing screencaps from the other 5.
>>
>>525824042
Keep in mind there are people literally paid to astroturf support for Timmy's bullshit here and elsewhere on the web.
>>
>>525824048
Keep in mind there are people paid to act like you
>>
TL;DR: Tim Epic is a pedophile.
>>
>>525824045
I must be the only person on this website that thinks that random retards using grok to make goon material of you online and have it plastered in your comments section to be kind of demeaning and it's like yeah no fucking shit a lot of people would be upset by it. The whole idea of sticking it into the comments was just retarded by inception.
>>
File: 1620998255311.png (453 KB, 830x460)
453 KB
453 KB PNG
>>525824049
>n-no u
Pathetic.
>>
>>525824052
Whatever, you transparent retard.
He who smelt it dealt it. You're going to lose your job to AI.
I'll just call you a pedophile while I'm at it. The future we chose.
>>
>>525823807
I think anyone who uploads their life to the internet gets what they deserve.
>>
>>525824009
If Timmy went to war on game journos he might actually redeem himself somewhat.
>>
>>525824055
why would he go against his biggest supporters
>>
>>525824054
The way normalfags perceive the internet is wild. If I posted a picture of myself to the entire internet, and one random third-worlder edits it to show me sucking a cock or something, that is the epitome of deaddove.jpg. What was I expecting by publishing my picture to the entirety of mankind? If that's a big deal then I shouldn't publish it, or at least just send it to people I actually know? Who would fucking care at all about it?
The absolute last thing I would care about it HOW that guy edited it, whether he used photoshop or typed a prompt or whatever. Who gives a shit. But it's weirder that people will share a public space with billions of people and believe there are social norms like they're in a park in a fucking small town
>>
>>525824051
I don't think that justifies banning the website, though.
There's plenty of reason to kill shitter, but that's not one of them
>>
>>525823799
All social media should be banned this site too, it is useless in the age of AI. Let's just welcome in the dead internet where everything sucks
>>
>>525824012
We should treat it like a form of cancer, it'll give you growth if that's what you want but it's going to be a disgusting tumor
>>
>>525823876
4chan is the useful idiot website now. full of the same people you find on reddit. the userbase is practically the same.
>>
>>525823857
>you're a retard because banning one social media platform will just be a precedent to ban others in the future
what's the downside here?
>>
>>525823799
It's impressive how much of a hole he's willing to dig without thinking just because his actual brainspace is all taken up by Gabe continued to exist somewhere.
>>
>>525824058
the website is providing the service
they could simply have the bot reject NSFW requests and none of this would be happening
>>
>>525824064
why would anyone care tho
>a picture is now nsfw
>so?
>Im mad
>why
>because
>reddit?
>reddit
>>
>>525824058
At this point it's just more shit to add to the shit pile really.
>>
>>525823799
why are poojeets and contrarians defending AI when the endpoint is obviously the jews using it to put 90% of humanity out of a job just so they can avoid paying wages?
>>
>>525823799
Gate keeping is based
>>
>>525824065
>why would anyone care tho
@grok edit this anon taking cock up the ass then send it to his mom
>>
>>525824061
No, 4chan is even dumber.
>>
you guys voted for this future, lay in your bed and shit it in
>>
>>525823807
Maybe women shouldn't be whoring it up on the internet with or without grok's assistance. You post pictures and details of your life to attentionwhore to all of humanity, humanity is going to do whatever they want with that.
>>
>>525823799
He's right, the world has seen enough american politics worming into every american owned social media. Still won't make me support buying out store exclusivity.
>>
>>525823917
>normalcattle
>low-iq normalfags
sorry to break it to you, but they are the majority of the users here nowadays.
>>
>>525823807
I really don't care, how is that different from people photoshopping you, it cutting a picture of your head and putting it on over a picture of someone else?
>>
>>525824075
I feel this is just another situation of elites wanting to control their goycattle
>oh no what if our slaves get uppity, we must ban things
>>
>>525824020
fell for fake news award
>>
>>730617495
Not everything is black & white. Tim Sweeney can be an asshole that constantly cries about Epic being a subpar store front that didn't even have categories and a cart for a long time, but he can also have a right opinion for once. People are trying to get X/Grok banned for political reasons now with "please think of the children", despite ChatGPT and other services being able to do the same.
>>
>>525824051
>it's okay to draw someone crawling up his own ass head first as a caricature of his character
>but it's not okay to use grok to do the same thing
You are like a child.
>>
>>525824051
What was stopping anyone from just replying to your post with a photoshopped picture of you sucking on a dick before?
>>
>>525823807
This is good. Its like a form of gatekeeping. might get normies the fuck off social media. The Internet should be for weirdos and spergs only.
>>
>>525823815
False equivalence. Shitbulls aren't blank slates, they're literally bred to murderrape anything smaller than a pony.
>>
>>525823807
I don't have twitter or social media so this will never happen
>>
Remember how people were frekaing out about Grok generating CP and it was just Indians asking Grok to put kids in bikinis and the bikinis weren't even erotic.
>>
>>525824051
Kill yourself my man
>>
>>525824042
Yes. Pedochads RULE over you snoys
>>
>>525823799
if Gabe said he HATES eating shit from a plate and thinks anyone that does it is a stupid retard this retatd would post a defense of poopoo feasting the next day doe
>>
>>525824087
That's effectively what happened after NFT games got banned on Steam and Epic welcomed them with open arms.
>>
I don't care if it's named twitter, x, bluesky, tiktok, reels, shorts or whatever else I want all infinite scroll algoslop and its users to disappear and the people running the shitholes publically executed for the profound brain damage they've inflicted on humanity actually.
>>
>>525824087
Yeah, just like If Gabe said he LIKES eating shit from a plate and thinks anyone that does not is a stupid retard all of the redditoids and 4chanoids come out from their momma's basement to defend eating poopoo from a plate.
>>
>>525824078
Ban them too.
>>
>>525823807
I wouldn't care. Everyone has an asshole.
>>
>>525824090
Just like when paid mods happened?
>>
>>525823807
>keep in mind a large portion of the population seemingly cannot tell that the image is edited
Then I would simply generate an image of them spreading their asshole to make them understand
>>
>>525823812
There's such a thing as a bad tool
You can't blame knives because most knives purpose isn't murdering
>>
>>525823799
>Timmy is a pedo
Is this the point where I act surprised?
>>
>>525823799
>publicity stunt, publicity stunt, publicity stunt, then another publicity stunt
How about making a good fucking product? FFS
>>
>>525824097
writing a tweet isnt that big a deal
>>
>>525824098
paying journos is
>>
>>525824099
you mean some AI bot that writes a tweet about other tweets
>>
>>525824100
what's your point, south east asia friend
>>
>>525824097
The only thing Timmy can do is make casinos for children.
>>
>>525824098
It is when it's all he does
>>
>>525823799
Eeeeeeyup BASED
>>
>>525823861
>>525823866
>>525823867
>>525823903
>>525824047
>>525824062
why do Europeans like censorship?
>>
>>525824105
modern social medias are just centralized hiveminds, it's never been as censored as it is right now
>>
>>525824080
Nothing, but at least it would take them more than a few seconds.
>>
File: 1715537373276978.jpg (56 KB, 287x325)
56 KB
56 KB JPG
>>525823878
If they kept it as private as possible nobody would care outside of the person who made it. If some guy sent me (or posted in public) nudes of my family I'd be deeply uncomfortable as well
>They shouldn't have posted their pictures online then
They're fucking normies
>>
>>525824108
Normalfags deserve to suffer.
>>
>>525823807
I wouldn't give a shit. Can sue if they start spamming it, otherwise they can fap to whatever they want.
>>
File: img_1_1767605835804.jpg (173 KB, 1008x1350)
173 KB
173 KB JPG
>tfw not a single picture of me online
>>
>>525823801
Tim's not defending the images, but the fact that leftists are using it as an excuse to shut down a site populated by le heckin' literal nazirinos.
Grok needs to be fixed or shut down, but Twitter itself is a cesspool that should be protected.
>>
>>525823799
As always Epic is cringe & Steam does smart things basedly.
>>
File: 1269609096212.jpg (35 KB, 640x360)
35 KB
35 KB JPG
baffles me how far the goyim will go to protect data-hoarding forced bullshit programs in their mental illness incubator platforms
>>
>>525824113
>but Twitter itself is a cesspool that should be protected.
Why? Let the Jeets spill over into the schools and churches. In the end, they'll be begging us to save them.
>>
>>525824052
Brotherman is posting on /v/?
>>
>>525824113
the only reason there's talks of a ban in the first place is that this has been going for weeks now and musk really hasn't been very reassuring that they have any intention to do anything substantial about it

any other app would've been nuked from every storefront for much less by now and you know it
>>
I don't even care about aishit but the raging faggots advocating for banning and censoring makes me want to support dog-face Sweeney on this one. At the end of the day the only real solution is to nuke india.
>>
>>525824119
Censoring and banning a tool that's used to make pornographic material of people that's instantly published online. You don't think that's at least a little bit degenerate and disruptive for the people who are victimized by it? I know you're going to recoil at the mere sight of the word 'victim,' but it's highly disturbing to have a program generate nudes of a person and then openly distribute them for all to see and access. People need to learn how to live with dignity, discipline, and self-control.
>>
>>525824120
No, I don't give a fuck. If you're so concerned about not having porn of yourself out there then don't post pictures of yourself on the internet. It's that simple.
>>
Stop uploading pictures of yourself online you retarded normalfags
>>
>>525824121
Bitch I cannot avoid having pictures of myself posted somewhere. All that needs to happen is for someone to post a selfie in a restaurant with me on a table somewhere.
>>
>>525824121
What if it was from your school yearbook?
What if it was a picture from before it was implicitly understood that online indians were going to take your vacation photos and use it for goon fuel?
What if you didn't post the picture publicly and someone took it from your private devices?
What if you didn't even take the photo, and someone else took it while you were in public?
>>
>>525824121
That's a meaningless argument because the pictures are already out there, you can't go back in time. Does that mean you think they deserve to be humiliated with derivative pornographic mock-ups? You have to live in the real world, this is the society you exist in, people post their photos online and that can't be a means for fucking with them. If you really think that's totally fine, I truly hope you never have children.
>>
>>525824125
It's the price of being a whore.
>>
>>525824094
>social media devolves into people posting AI spread assholes of each other
>people stop using social media
Hmm maybe this is actually a good thing
>>
>>525824126
Most of the people getting grok-gooned aren't even posting explicit images, you moron. The entire purpose of calling on grok is to MAKE them explicit, not because they were explicit in the first place. Jesus, you're stupid.
>>
>>525823874
the boomers and gen x went from saying shit like this and never trusting technology to thinking an AI video of trump flying on a toilet shitting on democrats is actually real, what the fuck happened
>>
>>525824129
The iPad came out giving them a piece of technology they could actually use and Facebook made it easy for them to upload photos from it.
>>525824120
When's photoshop getting banned?
Feminists actually tried this in the 2010s.
>>
>>525824124
>what if [extremely unlikely scenario]
what if someone commisions an artist to draw highly realistic porn of you huh??? bet you didnt think of that! the chance someone picks out (you) from millions of year book photos or stock crowd images and makes porn of you and spreads it to a siginificant number of people is microscopic.

If you use insecure spyware garbage or shared your personal information at a time when it was common sense not to on the internet that's on you. This is a nothingburger. Libel laws still exist if you want to take someone to court and Indians shitting up the internet is just more reason to rangeban those niggers from the western internet.
>>
>>525824128
If you post pictures of yourself online, you are a whore. It's really that simple, why do you need the validation of strangers that badly?
>>
>>525823807
why are the grok images even public? keep that shit and the prompts private and that would have cut many of the complaints
>>
>>525824130
Photoshopping someone's head on porn can be treated as fraud, blackmail, harassment, or creating non-consensual sexual content and is thus a crime. Grok prompts being treated as the same is just a matter of time.
>>
>>525823846
You think the people generating CP want people to think it's real? You think it's a ploy to get themselves arrested? Dumbest thing I've ever read.
>>
>>525824131
>what if someone commisions an artist to draw highly realistic porn of you huh
If they post it online i can call the cops on them for sexual harrassment. All people are asking is for prompted art to be treated as any other photoshop deepfake or regular art.
>>
>>525824134
>just a matter of time
It already is. The FBI has put out multiple statements that realistic and pornographic AI generations are a crime. They just don't bother to enforce it. An unenforced law might as well not exist.
>>
I'm already naked in all the pictures of me on the internet. Checkmate jeets.
>>
>>525824131
It's not that uncommon as far as antisocial behavior goes these days, and it's not always people getting picked out randomly. in fact, one of the most common scenarios is disgruntled workers making deepfakes of their coworkers or bosses. I also see stories every so often of people in school doing it to their classmates. Are people supposed to not work or go to school?
>>
>>525824136
Do the same for AI and sue them for libel. Either way it doesn't solve the problem of retards uploading their photos on the internet or poojeets being out of jurisdiction.
>>
>>525823958
What exactly is the argument here? That bad things are ok if they require effort? All fakes should be illegal or no fakes should be illegal regardless of how they're made.
>>
>>525823942
hes right doe do some reading of the US history, kid. Look up sexual liberation act.
>>
>>525824139
But then it comes back to same person could have just photoshopped to do the same thing. It's not THAT hard to shoop someone's head on a porn model especially nowadays with the tools available in photoshop.
>>
>>525823799
He really wants to win over /v/.
>>
>>525824121
NOOOOOOO YOU HAVE TO CARE ABOUT WHAT I WANT YOU TO CARE ABOUT!!! YOUR VOTE SHOULD GO TOWARDS WHAT I WANTTT
>>
File: 1631646876345.jpg (79 KB, 670x838)
79 KB
79 KB JPG
>when you tell normalfags they shouldn't share all their personal information online
>>
didn't Australia ban kids under 16 from using social media? I don't think they took it far enough. I think everyone under 16 and over 50 should be banned from social media, hell maybe even the whole internet. getting the kids and old shitters off the web would probably make things better
>>
>>525824143
That happened to one of my classmates in highschool, and that was around 13 years ago. These retards just want to ban shit for the sake of it.
>>
>>525823859
You can't and you won't. The internet is real life now, has been since 2015. There is no dual existence of IRL and online.
>>
>>525823878
Delusional and autistic.
>>
>>525824121
All it takes is some coworker or family member with a grudge to take a picture of you without you knowing to ruin your life.
>>
>>525824098
throwing your whole company's lot in behind the people making sloppa of cheese pizza is absolutely a big deal. now his whole brand will be associated with AI child porn and the poojeets genning it with grok.
>>
>>525824152
you seem to be a bit mentally ill
>>
>>525824153
yes, but that has nothing to do with tim siding with twitter (which everyone here should be glad to see die, but /pol/ brained retards think the opposite.) and especially in defence of allowing jeets to use AI to turn images of children into porn.
>>
File: you retard.jpg (37 KB, 682x548)
37 KB
37 KB JPG
>>525823799
>b-but if they censor this they can censor that too!
Why did this redditoid cope get so popular? They don't need a fucking precedent you lolberts, your made-up consistency rules don't stop them from wielding power
>>
>>525824154
>wanting the last bastion of free speech on the internet to die
I'm not jewish.
>>
>>525824154
nothing polfags and the retarded right love more then defending pedos, it's their whole purpose in life
>>
>>525824067
holy shit are you stupid are you going to claim Jews were behind the industrial revolution too, it doesn't matter anyway because AI is no where near capable enough to be taking everybody's job despite the delusions of some of the tech CEO's
>>
>>525823978
>people could already do this with photoshop
not everyone, now even the laziest most low-life spiteful gooner nigger can use AI gen to do it
>>
>>525824156
oh you're actually insane enough to think you have free speech on twitter. no wonder you seem to be confused.
>>
If you have a degree, your face is in a yearbook that is publicly accessible and in the walls of an university somewhere. If you have literally any relevance in any academic field, published anything of note, wrote anything of note, have any position in any corporation outside of the gruntiest of grunt work, participated in any program or initiative that mattered, your face is in a website somewhere. If you walked into a subway, any subway, chances are someone caught your face in a photo. /v/ doesn't understand this because they don't leave their houses, but there is simply no way to escape this. It's not a matter of selfies or social media anymore; people's faces inevitably find their way to the internet, and there is no scrubbing them out.
>>
>>525824161
https://vocaroo.com/1aTqq7oVvesj
>>
>every youngster can get a photo of their hot teachers and make them do anything
>using just a phone they all already have
Every future generation is just going to get more and more fucked arent they?
>>
>>525824163
All their classmates too. The social media based bullying was already getting really bad even before kids could generate humiliating videos of one another. And that's one context were it doesn't matter if anyone believes it.
>>
>>525824163
They can get expelled or something.
>>
>>525824009
I'll actually play one of those free games I claimed on Tim's store if he sues pcgamer into the dirt.
>>
>>525824163
>fucked
How? I would have loved to have that technology when I was growing up
>>
>>525824009
If the Hulkster can take down Gawker, Uncle Tim can take down PC Gamer
>>
>>525824163
I mean, in high school some students used photoshop.
>>
>>525823947
We've had fakes since the 90s. I fondly recall jacking it in middle school to a fake Britney Spears.
>>
>>525824170
>This is if not fake taken out of context like always
Don't post something on the internet if you don't want it to be taken out of context.
>>
>>525823842
How is it dogshit?
>>
No one has made a convincing argument for why this is bad.

>But what if they generated an image of you, or your kids or wife?
Still wouldn't care? It doesn' affect me, its just an image.
>>
>>525824174
*generates an image of you caring*
what now chuddie?
>>
>>525823807
Originally, laws about minors were intended to protect the honor of the real minor-person. Then came a coallition of bible thumpers and emotionally immature rape victims that took the wording to refer to the abstract concept of minorhood and associated concepts.

You could argue grok doesn't use anyone's image or likeness to generate content, it uses statistical patterns and shapes, not unlike what ends up going in your brain, and outputs things that don't exist. Anything grok creates is mere pareidolia.

Of course the ones who fight this won't stop at this and will keep trying to erase any conception of sexuality in minors even though they fight against nature.
>>
File: 1740298488698482.jpg (50 KB, 700x847)
50 KB
50 KB JPG
>>525824175
gotem
>>
>>525823801
>Am I harmed by this?
Maybe not, but what would your mom think of it?
>>
>>525823808
Lmao that guys never been laid, let alone has a kid
>>
>>525823807
Don't need a enterprise tier AI to do this. Local models do it just fine. You can't escape this anymore, its unironically too late.
>>
>>525824174
Then post your picture so we can edit it with a.i. what do you care?
>>
>>525823809
DING DING DING

35 years of life and I've ZERO photos of me or my family on the internet.

You were taught about the dangers of the internet since you were 4.
>>
>>525823801
A picture of what?
>>
>>525823808
I remember that gif.
>>
People have been Photoshoping photos for years. It's really not different.
>>
>>525824182
What about your family though? What about strangers taking pictures of you? What about random privacy breaches? You're on the internet, everybody from the 1st world is.
>>
>>525824182
Imagine being on this forsaken rock for 35 years and never once going out with your friends or sum jej
>>
>>525824186
If I didn't take and upload the picture how will I be aware of others editing it?
>>
>>525824183
ts murks the pedophile gng
>>
>>525824186
>What about random privacy breaches?
I'm not black.
>>
>>525824187
If your friends don't think like you, then they are not your friends. None of my friends use social media. We've photos together, they are in our phone, not the internet.
>>
>>525823799
absolutely based
>>
>moved to /pol/
Cowardly. It's related to /g/ the most if semantics are regarded.
>>
rightoids defending pedos to own the libs
>>
>>525824341
>either do what i say or you're a nazi racist pedo incel bla bla
nice try libby
>>
This headline is a masterpiece of propaganda lmao. Too obvious for me but it worked
>"well other AI can generate these images, it's not specific to grok
TIM SWEENEY DEFENDS AI GENERATED CHILD PORN!
kek
>>
>>525823807
Someone could always photoshop it. It's just easier now. Get over it? Oh no, someone photoshopped me naked. who cares?
>>
Funny how the same people who didn't buy the retarded, transparent "THINK OF THE CHILDREN" messaging to push through Chat Control are now parroting "THINK OF THE FICTIONAL CHILDREN" to push AI regulation.

Fuck leftoids. Fuck rightoids. Total human death.
>>
>>525825421
>FICTIONAL CHILDREN
it's real children the pedos are having Grok put in "plastic wrap bikinis" and "dental floss bikinis" and other shit like that
and Elon's response was just to hide Grok's media tab
>>
>>525825684
Oh no. The real child was grabbed and dressed in dental floss. Better ban the internet.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.